UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its2 _" W3 F" p1 t; l$ T% A
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
0 ^. _% B2 `( \- C0 R9 J" bBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
6 C8 f% o( ~& u. M" s q O5 Xcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
/ v2 D: `: E$ P7 SAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
/ V9 E9 \4 Y3 {, t3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
+ H1 b& `4 A I6 QManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within$ ]" n ]# c$ G5 P8 O- d* S
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
" c: ]3 j% P, i4 G6 t; z# E3 @& Xeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera7 f5 Y: W( T4 Q
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is2 ?2 L) `3 A* B, N
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are" e: O2 ?) `" ?( a
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
" z; \& M+ g/ B2 G) c. W6 p5 Fforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
8 _' b$ w5 Y# ~, {5 zwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
0 X$ a8 j6 Q( fimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,8 x: {! i) a2 p$ g) E/ j* e
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
* J. ^" ], | U5 A/ q- rhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
' A1 n% y5 x( C3 \2 hof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that l0 T& F- g7 P4 f$ r
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
6 r7 v1 i {( Q9 J8 Konly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
8 b9 ^1 {" J) I% I- S* W1 x! N6 K% z3 rsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
9 v; ^, T- ~. s/ b/ E0 K. B7 Hwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
$ K) c9 M# Z" [2 Eto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is& V# g2 C H1 b; I- ?( \
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
6 @8 [6 h U1 s: o+ Ithis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
" V+ g6 ^4 x% j- T7 Kstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to m0 o9 e4 S. e; J* l% E8 ?
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
! o# ^# D2 i- y% A# D0 vmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was/ v# X9 Y/ }2 z! Q, L8 o
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
; J: S' ~5 V8 p3 Gparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
( r" i9 d' e! l W$ z+ y, Z$ ythe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural$ G/ M7 r1 ?, n3 I( o2 Z5 a. B
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for- \1 A3 `+ `: C% o+ g4 i9 |1 B% T
development.
Hutongs( G* n9 Q5 ]% y( r6 g# Z
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived% r& l0 f/ L: R) P4 Z
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions& D+ L) \+ I) q$ W- T
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
+ u* M/ {( p8 d; M8 y+ z% xhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you0 r8 ^2 R! o5 C; K9 W: P' y
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.- t- _1 I, F9 w( [* I
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
. V3 f; [5 I I- S9 ito support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
2 R! X8 `$ Z5 i) C( [to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
' m+ ^7 e; R$ y; Xsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically+ u! h8 Q" t8 |
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to$ {! I$ ~/ _3 {# S% p
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,. Y. D* E) l% r _/ g! q- c
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
/ O7 R3 z" S; @% l3 L7 z' l5 N. xbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
% h! J% x9 z' S# ~0 V' bproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be+ M9 f/ f+ e+ |
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
$ h0 a: k+ y# a/ v* \2 y' TMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how$ D# |5 ~8 S( u
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
7 x: G7 D4 y# e* W8 Y) gtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished* y% k$ T! v& M3 B5 y
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".9 q+ S, a! R, j% p2 F8 \
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are& i% N& H! O* X/ Q) ^6 G+ f
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
) z7 d2 G# B4 H' hnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image1 T% [# z% W j3 _
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these( ~$ w4 {3 F! i3 t* y. y
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those l9 |% Z: z: H5 E$ w, `
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
$ s3 A( {' x0 E: Y6 M8 _! Omay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
: m" Q6 g; }5 C. u5 gof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
0 s; q! o4 @ `2 u% _' P"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
+ o9 Q& ^$ c { Epeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise, g) O& W+ u8 }4 e
apartments are the way to go? No.
3 m5 k( Q3 V7 o" e3 t
7 D$ K2 e; b5 y7 r / t2 K/ f9 i H7 b( h- v; H$ ~# _. n
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
; Q' E2 A* O& p- h) [* Tsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
8 m/ ~- M) s" m) \2 q'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
- _' }- J6 |& q. O P2 g6 L, _no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
* {! ]5 g; e+ H K' ?fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant& r+ j" L" w# ^7 k% d! F( E# M
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless& Y7 d: o% M, [& G2 j) E
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
/ r& X, C' h9 V% iunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|