|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 5991|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 5 {" o, Z" \; X0 E1 Earchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider : i0 ~/ a' L2 i3 N6 l. TBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"; V( M1 O: E+ v6 R$ p$ Y city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 2 p) e* n" B; G$ e4 iAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, , R2 ^: a8 x# l; R3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of; t& ?: U9 S0 u Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within2 h* F5 T+ E0 z$ b& `% J' f) `) T: \ hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ) Y2 I% [6 y, B0 `( } J' d: m- Veach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera: b I l! I8 w: R; y8 l0 s and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is x! L: N6 V& b, i: | harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are2 W9 i" j0 i# t* H2 H7 D descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and ( g6 l% ~) k4 F7 `/ Q _forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 7 O& P3 y% w6 i$ j7 h; A7 {was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 7 ?; i. a% k$ x% I" K; ?* cimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 7 F& ~* }3 ~5 q$ M* `and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong + q+ v2 x; N, N. y) bhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment2 h1 I% L$ R; L- \4 K8 B9 ` of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that / A I8 W8 c5 }! a8 U- Cno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are - b4 O# x$ t2 x1 J' Z. Oonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a6 n4 H' p8 T) p9 ?" A7 ^$ ]+ T; ?3 Z sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government: z0 I4 ]$ _4 v! q8 Z) i: Q( n want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move : C; E- x+ _: n0 _8 @, D$ H( c' tto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ) m2 h* K" ]8 R" W1 x7 a"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,) G% N& O9 J( f9 ]( V% z6 d this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 3 T7 H" r% Q9 tstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 6 F- R) f% C: t6 p"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make) Y5 l# D' c1 m f money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was ( D- @: [; w4 B8 y9 I! Sa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a * `4 x3 G1 m8 J+ f! S) uparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across # ]5 H9 G; f, Z! Ithe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ; h+ F1 G# z9 u5 s4 Eimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for5 S [+ u0 _' Z! N development.

Hutongs . ?+ M# o6 H1 H ~0 ?' lin the old days were residential area where people actually lived 1 w+ h: I0 t6 _there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 3 Z: ]9 y' \% I4 c$ ]& Q# Yin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not / R3 U! P% _( @have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ' T5 b7 _/ t) S8 Vwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.7 {9 V: K" y, I- t Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 5 ~) o& i; @* q eto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used8 f( J; x( I: C3 X% A, G to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses- u4 m9 l$ c B/ t- g support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically( ^0 b+ m0 n: v! B unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 8 m4 Z) A, g4 @, v L* a$ klive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 0 X6 l W( p9 l# o- F k3 ehutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the : `9 J. v d* F- i5 nbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the; e w' X- q' U) j& W' P; z) ? project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be + H0 M" [2 v% L. lrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong) P7 e' E8 B* d# F Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how, K0 J" Q) \7 p: f" d people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be , s3 Z8 U& E* X/ b/ Q# z+ Htorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished/ K8 X2 j8 b% I. v- h memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".. P; A0 Z4 h& _- \; q- l Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are2 K0 w1 X8 ^5 R+ q; A2 O d aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially : D& Y) N. {8 q# enon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image1 Q: _" d3 }4 N J of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these5 b; r9 P: _0 N/ q1 N& n Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those W @; e/ x8 G* q% Cpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they # H4 L- h. f7 y# Omay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ; ?, I8 r0 ?; J3 _$ f7 rof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before4 \: V) R# | s! ?' Z5 Q "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all1 @: k: [, _$ [. [ people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise " `0 h$ B0 I6 S8 L: bapartments are the way to go? No.: S9 N( w1 D+ v7 n ( ^& {/ V s( t2 X9 n4 s * _& b% V! {$ S% t2 c# K

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the + o; N+ B- M+ e8 n8 m( Wsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this , X8 H& [! E' }" c1 a% W' f'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make $ c' ]1 E- X1 D; n0 r- Xno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so0 Q; ~6 z9 X) L4 e fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ) q7 D" O# A& z T; d( mresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ( d! Q6 f$ m! Y2 z: |! vBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 9 b/ r1 Q% E% V5 d( I! g) dunlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-7-5 19:59 , Processed in 1.157477 second(s), 6 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部