UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
5 {" o, Z" \; X0 E1 Earchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
: i0 ~/ a' L2 i3 N6 l. TBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"; V( M1 O: E+ v6 R$ p$ Y
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
2 p) e* n" B; G$ e4 iAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
, R2 ^: a8 x# l; R3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of; t& ?: U9 S0 u
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within2 h* F5 T+ E0 z$ b& `% J' f) `) T: \
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
) Y2 I% [6 y, B0 `( } J' d: m- Veach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera: b I l! I8 w: R; y8 l0 s
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is x! L: N6 V& b, i: |
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are2 W9 i" j0 i# t* H2 H7 D
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
( g6 l% ~) k4 F7 `/ Q _forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
7 O& P3 y% w6 i$ j7 h; A7 {was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
7 ?; i. a% k$ x% I" K; ?* cimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
7 F& ~* }3 ~5 q$ M* `and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
+ q+ v2 x; N, N. y) bhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment2 h1 I% L$ R; L- \4 K8 B9 `
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
/ A I8 W8 c5 }! a8 U- Cno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
- b4 O# x$ t2 x1 J' Z. Oonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a6 n4 H' p8 T) p9 ?" A7 ^$ ]+ T; ?3 Z
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government: z0 I4 ]$ _4 v! q8 Z) i: Q( n
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
: C; E- x+ _: n0 _8 @, D$ H( c' tto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
) m2 h* K" ]8 R" W1 x7 a"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,) G% N& O9 J( f9 ]( V% z6 d
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
3 T7 H" r% Q9 tstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
6 F- R) f% C: t6 p"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make) Y5 l# D' c1 m f
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
( D- @: [; w4 B8 y9 I! Sa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
* `4 x3 G1 m8 J+ f! S) uparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
# ]5 H9 G; f, Z! Ithe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
; h+ F1 G# z9 u5 s4 Eimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for5 S [+ u0 _' Z! N
development.
Hutongs
. ?+ M# o6 H1 H ~0 ?' lin the old days were residential area where people actually lived
1 w+ h: I0 t6 _there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
3 Z: ]9 y' \% I4 c$ ]& Q# Yin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
/ R3 U! P% _( @have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
' T5 b7 _/ t) S8 Vwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.7 {9 V: K" y, I- t
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
5 ~) o& i; @* q eto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used8 f( J; x( I: C3 X% A, G
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses- u4 m9 l$ c B/ t- g
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically( ^0 b+ m0 n: v! B
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
8 m4 Z) A, g4 @, v L* a$ klive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
0 X6 l W( p9 l# o- F k3 ehutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
: `9 J. v d* F- i5 nbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the; e w' X- q' U) j& W' P; z) ?
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
+ H0 M" [2 v% L. lrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong) P7 e' E8 B* d# F
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how, K0 J" Q) \7 p: f" d
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
, s3 Z8 U& E* X/ b/ Q# z+ Htorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished/ K8 X2 j8 b% I. v- h
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".. P; A0 Z4 h& _- \; q- l
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are2 K0 w1 X8 ^5 R+ q; A2 O d
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
: D& Y) N. {8 q# enon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image1 Q: _" d3 }4 N J
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these5 b; r9 P: _0 N/ q1 N& n
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
W @; e/ x8 G* q% Cpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
# H4 L- h. f7 y# Omay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
; ?, I8 r0 ?; J3 _$ f7 rof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before4 \: V) R# | s! ?' Z5 Q
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all1 @: k: [, _$ [. [
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
" `0 h$ B0 I6 S8 L: bapartments are the way to go? No.: S9 N( w1 D+ v7 n
( ^& {/ V s( t2 X9 n4 s
* _& b% V! {$ S% t2 c# K
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
+ o; N+ B- M+ e8 n8 m( Wsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
, X8 H& [! E' }" c1 a% W' f'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
$ c' ]1 E- X1 D; n0 r- Xno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so0 Q; ~6 z9 X) L4 e
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
) q7 D" O# A& z T; d( mresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
( d! Q6 f$ m! Y2 z: |! vBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
9 b/ r1 Q% E% V5 d( I! g) dunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|