服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6339|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 2 B& D8 h z7 I8 R( Warchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 1 o, W( U$ i/ ]Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"2 |+ l; @+ C3 i4 i city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 0 B+ I! E% Z+ M$ n$ ?, k' f2 |1 WAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,. x; r y0 N$ S$ c% a3 r 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of . N- Z9 W. u1 ?! t& xManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within1 @& F/ X" [: Y3 l' P3 n8 X% Z hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among* D; Z7 x! b7 G( _" h. n: { each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera2 q* E4 a+ i! C1 I; d/ i1 }6 _ and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is: ?& @# A8 x3 T8 ~: z harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ' Z R( E1 {+ w C3 a, N5 udescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 4 R" L1 N/ A/ l- Uforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ' ~! N+ o* g4 U& X- i# T2 ]2 dwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 6 d1 ~5 K* w1 e9 P1 kimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,6 I6 I7 M3 m3 u: m" a and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong2 O: U$ Z9 e. O, E [3 }( x. w3 c: t has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment" {: H# b/ E ^3 {9 c5 q) Z& O3 H of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that5 v, f- [" U% o: d( C no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ) w8 x8 u! p& F6 E0 m3 Tonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a+ t- F. S" h- q o' o: ]' _, R sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government - a. v- R: D s3 W9 j) ^! hwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 3 y7 \% f( @7 q- Z/ {8 l4 eto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is# T' m, o1 l2 ~2 N1 i% r+ u "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, : H D% k' c5 L" Ithis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ! Z+ o( J4 y; G5 `still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 1 E: t9 U% k; r5 u# J"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make7 d( O6 d+ X3 n0 m4 J% M- z. u. V money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was o- q: J( p" Z0 Y+ g" ba beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a * C2 k& H. ^& D& b8 B' Dparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across2 T. a- e( C0 D* R: X the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural5 [5 e/ t. l. E6 a importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for, D" X2 Z. `! f$ m5 H, M" `/ |6 l development.

Hutongs) u3 K I" c' ^ p5 i# @ in the old days were residential area where people actually lived ' @/ R8 n, v- I0 Z z# H2 x& Mthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions ! \7 ?3 d/ \" {1 ?$ U2 j- uin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not, ~* ]3 X2 L, `5 F6 L have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you5 W4 d; d* f, w$ ]5 l( |# T will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 1 [$ F" G& I0 l) c: h7 yFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 3 C* R# T2 w Z6 R6 wto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used! F$ c* M% h$ X5 G! J4 l to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses7 Q7 {1 {/ o' o3 P0 I" e6 @' w support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically$ {$ X9 ^' y: F8 z unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to( e; [% g/ X4 g$ o8 Z) d live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 9 W) y/ ] H' P7 d$ shutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the$ ?+ `' \& q" T+ @" A balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the ( g# R& Y+ q X+ G+ y+ p) mproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be( K1 I9 X0 ` I: b$ }& l. {) } renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong# G" z* U( ~! @3 B' s Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how0 ?# `7 p) b; {! Z people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be$ S7 m% y! @1 [9 v9 \ torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished # H* m5 W/ ^( s+ w% {memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".7 b( z, x3 Z- d- a$ M Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 8 @) C4 D) B. E k( e/ Ualigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 4 z; E7 Z/ u7 cnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image ; B3 N% q/ n2 [" Uof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 0 D2 A/ b1 M: R6 vHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those . p- }. @: r( ^9 m. D& C3 Tpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they4 r8 i- v0 N$ T6 E may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some" p) D; S# W6 q6 o3 V0 {- e, w of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before5 y8 P# J" w8 { \: @ "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 7 P E7 s" k% L' G& apeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise, c; I; E" _* w apartments are the way to go? No.. |; P$ Q) @6 P e + O) [* m4 l! Z " e; g' j3 {$ Y J

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 3 Z3 f9 b! u" N1 u: Ssituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ( `3 A& @: c, g$ Q'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make & G+ f" T3 B( V9 y% eno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so3 O$ P5 `/ k6 D6 Q: {$ V fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant / k" Z2 ~. Q. Iresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless% H5 n8 P' |+ n/ X Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is2 A! \+ B0 H2 c7 i+ O# { unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-30 07:38 , Processed in 0.124474 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部