服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6566|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its8 L. D; x% t0 G architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider2 h- c2 y3 H2 d% h/ `( c Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" - J& G- f4 F7 dcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. I7 y+ K: @2 ^- b- W According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, }9 J* j, f# A. B3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of0 X( H9 ~: K2 _' C+ X4 h3 \6 I Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 1 s$ h( d1 ^% ]2 b$ `7 thutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among- z+ s2 a, B- L1 g$ Y each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera! T/ G. C* W' H) @: I, E and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is C( z4 H4 n; |, L8 |/ y& Tharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ; [* m& [& ^. K( H2 Z4 kdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and6 _+ M2 T4 ^, X' X forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I, N1 q, K8 ? ~2 N+ W was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great * l7 [) [+ q' Y+ Y: L ?impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,1 M" i$ z! W) E+ a2 N1 H* m and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 9 w/ i/ E' k. shas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment; p6 O! L- _4 B Z# o+ t of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 7 K1 B# {" W" B( u) q4 Fno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are" t* ~+ O6 n& }8 K" N* t0 p; ] only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a g9 R% L o6 [0 \/ w# |sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government% H; z& ?1 q t+ C$ } want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move. Q( c! T) W6 S0 k$ Q to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is U5 N! s2 p- A' F "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,' u. }) N: s% N0 E$ {) S+ q3 |+ i/ v this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ! h2 z" }/ J8 {0 k0 [+ _4 Nstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 3 R" e# o5 ~0 v, J"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 2 K% p1 ~# W& v: B: h' \money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 3 ]' l$ ~; ?# e5 q9 H9 Fa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a: Y( W$ G# B. Q* v) J7 u. } parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across $ e# X9 h" g: B; W3 [) | g. q1 Q8 ^the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural$ I. ]. \$ o$ I9 _% _ importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 1 T$ c1 @% |. kdevelopment.

Hutongs 0 M) }0 y& j- k) L4 [in the old days were residential area where people actually lived # ^* a) N1 T" l, qthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions4 C3 s {- I0 S- H% F6 \ in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not + Y! e' A% t# k4 _! u; u, P+ p' Vhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you! g ^/ D3 H& o b9 ]# A will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ! ], ^. C/ o, A8 R3 l+ V* oFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date" e/ @2 [6 M1 N to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used) f! j% B3 w: A to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ) T L& A# x; T) r/ _ P/ xsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically ) m4 L4 v _- Z% C, {( V& e nunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ; m q. p: ~, j5 L/ ?) Y- mlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,5 C) H3 w: C: l0 o& t hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the $ n& z% }; P& c9 l Mbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the " p% `) K. k& h4 {! Y/ Vproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 8 p5 d. `2 ^; E3 arenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong + H9 K4 f) W: W6 k {Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how * v8 ]: d" _, k: H h _people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be ) {" Z# Y1 y' q% o) P0 rtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished# ?! H# v" L% a3 @% E6 N5 n! j) ] memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". , e) {5 I# p* C4 j5 f+ ?/ NNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 4 k3 z3 E9 X+ @6 M! D7 K3 l( M/ paligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially : |: a+ N }9 a: `8 Nnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image % @- Q4 E- P" K/ d( jof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these( R S0 b5 }7 l9 D9 j Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those: o1 `* g5 y: { d/ m2 y people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they f- l) C- q* a/ U( ~ A B may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some/ N( |: n% D7 T2 g2 L8 f of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before) u. y T; T2 K6 W3 J+ ?" L( M& ^+ y "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all5 _, a" e! q( F& p9 k# t8 K people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise4 h7 H# j1 d; z2 g$ F apartments are the way to go? No. ' I g/ q& n4 E# P- C, P . G3 J, e5 \( ] 6 @; n- }/ R4 l% R, J9 e, A

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the , R7 I0 ?, B/ _' i/ lsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ' {+ X1 m6 c2 W* @; b'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 3 P% i' z- a- u" I- t4 T/ V! Tno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so g& G, @, g( s, Lfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant # q+ J f4 z' v3 Y5 \1 \resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless + x9 o8 }7 g7 V$ YBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ) R* ~( u; P; r! h5 u3 U# ~unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-26 13:53 , Processed in 0.133800 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部