服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6740|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its6 s/ Z: q s- z' J+ Q architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 9 p+ P7 N2 J# n6 i ABeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"- T2 F: F& J/ n- K city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. # C ?# x; G' r9 C9 W9 x. ]3 I& B8 }According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, + B' X8 q9 Z7 I6 M3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ) H/ m$ u+ s3 [ \ ]: M* D# zManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within& j* S* P3 }& r1 V hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ) R& E/ U9 I6 Xeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera ) ]; k0 q( [7 ?and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is ( C0 P+ T# K; W" M( `9 L" u; Charmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are + ]' @" s/ P" N# \3 Rdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and* o; K4 q$ M5 O4 J forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 5 @( C8 C U& n+ p/ k7 y: kwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great# j L3 D' f( L4 \ impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 7 K) W5 u$ y. t& C f+ sand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong! t d* w) X. g+ }3 \; U has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment$ P' v, G( v8 Z: p7 M5 h of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that ) ]) x {# Z0 k* K4 R1 K: y( Z: z; Eno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are / c- A+ q- Z% l. l3 lonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a8 @( I: Y, K; m sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government' a. b" E9 n6 B# {2 i want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move ' D* T$ N, u4 W* \to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 6 g. n6 R; ]' y& _9 B"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 6 w( t; M% \0 qthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are % W, @4 N: q+ T+ _! R& tstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to; R: J( J! ` u/ b "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ; n0 |% p/ \) w; X1 ?( \- {/ B1 ` r5 wmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was' J- R$ c/ i8 p a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a8 P- r( x* \2 G& u3 H parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across4 a- z+ S+ q I& q% o9 N- U, O0 d the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural& o5 I% T3 C7 ~9 F4 g- v) s' u4 } importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for- h0 h( |& m. G( Y* U development.

Hutongs , s0 N: r% L* z* Win the old days were residential area where people actually lived ! ?3 Z( `) o$ D5 a5 F1 B4 Vthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 2 r9 B* W! M/ S5 X; ^, |' Iin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not( T% ~( J0 F- \, k/ c8 _ have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you0 q* n0 j. M7 b3 n will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.6 |6 _3 ~8 X7 }2 J% L/ ` v G8 ` Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 9 C/ j# a& l, ?( T: O4 H1 ~to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used) P' {, O! I7 w$ Y/ z; V to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses- N6 u! ^7 U* }7 Q' e& {! B support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically8 N% P# P! y1 }1 L) E% l unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to! L$ E, a9 Z8 A live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,: K3 m! B$ v) g" F6 Z/ T3 n' F hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the : V" y7 n( {6 p( V& @4 t5 dbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 3 W6 T2 N7 C+ y9 m- Gproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be , N# t: V4 E* N; U0 W0 ^+ Hrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong$ X/ g o! U7 a1 h0 k) f Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how m; p* B( {0 Ypeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be - S( C1 {' v) q& Xtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished: A- u9 S. R, t+ b* J memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". $ s; z& Q) x* H a7 |1 TNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ( U4 [0 A# Y2 X- taligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially % n& ?7 n/ T; x- a5 n# N E; S/ x+ Snon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image* x+ ~9 R3 }# u( c of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these4 t: l8 k8 U$ U; ?8 H Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those4 I( D1 K. i$ c; B% U people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they- T0 ^9 f, O' ^. w1 C may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 2 z$ I" y, g6 K& _' L$ k* qof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before) t4 O t* |0 @% Y* A, u "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 0 ?# F, x9 [, @6 E& @6 g8 Kpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise + z& t/ u/ K% T; Xapartments are the way to go? No. 5 \: e, X1 u5 @8 f+ v$ z4 G' ^" \ ) j! @3 d/ \ }- Y ( W- f$ m9 h% p

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the# \4 D5 x/ J" M2 T1 L situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this7 _% ]! s3 ~' J 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make) i9 S7 |! }5 m% n( M- p no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 2 N7 }+ P$ t, w) pfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ' y8 @/ q+ f B2 P Gresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless' f2 B! n, Q6 y* n; u" W ?/ i2 P Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is + E/ U8 o1 k! n: X8 Runlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-15 15:06 , Processed in 0.130216 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部