服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6541|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 5 k) U( Z! ^7 L$ B9 u- T; F, {/ karchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider % u" @& f: p+ B/ R& B( W7 YBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" , M2 V% K, m) F, K9 gcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.6 a, z- b d! Z' ^+ A4 v4 v According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, : c$ l' U2 }) C/ |3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 8 z5 t' ?5 {+ J$ [) b2 h+ O: ~0 R) LManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within5 S" ^+ \0 u& k* K hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among" |: v0 H, |: w ]' x M. b each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera + s: p& m$ j$ w! kand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is& T. F4 j+ D% w' r1 t0 P% ~5 U5 E harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are. ]2 h1 @! B- { descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 6 f g: z% D+ F2 w5 x9 Sforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ( @4 F8 I$ O8 h! o+ \! o5 _( Ywas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great ^5 j; u2 x+ Z% S impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 5 m+ N5 k/ u7 E0 ?! x! P* wand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong3 n ]- ]. u% ~; O# V3 M has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ; a- j9 P7 s; w4 v+ Vof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that * L9 L. r/ @ f; Q2 z( ?2 ^* ^no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are' K; @; Q& I$ ?: d1 [! } only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 0 o2 z. S: P( ~. K* J9 asort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government' X* a$ y: P5 l5 p, Z# {, K8 O( B# R want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move ( Z9 }) T4 ]. p5 h9 ^ Qto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is: s$ b- [3 V0 `1 B "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,: q; M" S4 q/ H0 y# w( T this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are% d* q* ~% \& D, u still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 6 W6 q/ e3 `# H5 c' ~; c! D"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make2 `6 q6 t) i) o% A8 G# T money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 2 \$ n% Z% l! O. e; s* `8 sa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a' {) i1 t2 ]& _+ b parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across . @+ {' W$ B9 i5 [1 p4 Gthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 1 @% m) K& i5 Y4 wimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for0 m& k" V+ G1 d9 M5 H development.

Hutongs , S/ A0 b. Z4 m& sin the old days were residential area where people actually lived 0 \2 m2 _& ]1 \ w1 Ithere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 3 h* N+ z; f Rin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ! q/ g+ c9 A9 N' ]' @7 J. vhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you( l$ m6 G* T, J+ }/ x will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. k+ ^# t" W- q- n. L% Q0 o5 }+ ^ Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date : G2 V3 s6 @/ ~$ Uto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used9 s& v- T/ x: N" P \8 W& L to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses# s4 b6 |4 {- Y; I# W# f$ h support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 8 v" j- X* d) `" \6 A+ j* k6 [unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ; Q* U4 g8 r: A; o6 \0 Ulive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,. B' ` t2 a) m0 I4 S hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the3 R! T: ~7 o3 t balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the6 e# Q$ v1 J: A; ]- B project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ' \7 x, p4 V8 |6 R2 g9 irenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong % X* s* z5 e$ {& eMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how( l- n+ O! A: a people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 0 o+ z' |2 Y5 h# h2 {$ Ctorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished/ c0 G8 G; }7 ?9 ~/ L7 | memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".0 O$ w0 O" k+ h Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are& h% B7 Q B3 s aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 7 f) k" \ P6 b: R6 ~non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image - V8 _/ C# G8 T2 dof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these* M6 H }0 g! m Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those * ]( X+ U) Q1 e: Lpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they8 u" x4 `/ W5 G% s may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some & m0 P$ U/ @! ?. k7 q4 pof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before/ `: z- l6 p# Q/ l; f "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 7 h$ v6 w# p8 M+ hpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 2 o8 L$ L; i) X2 a9 q' \apartments are the way to go? No. 4 o, P8 b* ]& l% E # }. Q1 \/ X+ [% C; L6 o . j* Y) y, C5 J2 P

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the + F6 T; s0 D% `situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this " O7 f0 q. K% J$ h'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make # O# L4 \8 w" q0 W( X: s7 B8 _ h4 uno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ! d% V6 J* t) v; Y' @" {* h" J* ]fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ; I: |, }5 g* P# sresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless( B; I' j4 D: |- T- O Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 3 a- I' B( E3 o: g, Y$ runlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-23 01:57 , Processed in 0.123681 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部