UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
6 x. K0 n1 ]! [9 `6 g" }architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
- F0 _3 ?$ D+ ~Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
$ [% G- ~* l: c. u- R. ?4 w7 Tcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.; E4 I! j" y: U9 g. R
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,' J+ a- e: G3 N
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of0 P9 x( u$ X$ [/ b! e& T2 w+ y
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
& x3 a, P/ k7 m$ A1 O! n# thutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among( s X3 ^( T8 [+ C F/ D( i, @% U
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera' X& m- Z& x H* y% I4 R* e
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is7 M, |" A# y4 a! R( {% b
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are& k+ ^$ O4 [- Q4 \% z1 |, U
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and1 F4 ^3 K/ g% Z3 ?2 x. C5 [
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I( R3 n* j l( @) [, z7 e4 R
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
. M/ e2 l: n2 j. @# l& z5 qimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
' P9 Y9 Y( b, X; {4 R& Fand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
- ?, V1 Z/ c2 ]; f! I% G3 V- p6 Hhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment& w2 J! d7 L1 u6 h+ r4 g
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
1 P h5 }# B8 vno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are/ E. K- L7 m1 u& k. X: _; \2 C
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
$ i8 K8 l9 s, R& {6 {% _+ ~/ a- csort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
, t+ |8 S( v* Awant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move9 G0 R7 y, B. t. k5 ~$ B
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is8 o/ D& j b2 W; D
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,. H4 z& _# ?% H4 ~, T1 F. X0 _, l
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are+ A- K3 i3 ?0 a
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to& h" O3 r% w- s6 N+ @- f1 r8 B
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
4 r' N8 d% s j$ H; g+ Imoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was& H, `0 m- b, V9 E6 ^
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
# v2 f( }. d) \6 b8 N7 bparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
# ?% j+ k/ M* O/ D* wthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
0 F- T, u8 T( a+ x- _4 ]importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for' z. I/ b6 N4 ?& d4 p: y& t# n
development.
Hutongs! I! U; ?0 k0 U* V! v; a
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
+ g0 D7 m, |2 m D/ B* {/ h) |6 [9 ythere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
) K* a% Z. U# j* X) D9 ]in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not$ k+ a; g$ z- C7 E7 |$ m3 [: q
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
2 [4 @+ A$ K: v& [will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
! D2 x1 E$ N( n/ d- ZFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
5 \2 l* z8 L; Z ]; U4 ^# ]to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
5 Y% U/ E. G7 \to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses7 V% g2 R |5 p+ I- ^8 t. T
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically" L/ a) Y& z6 X8 M( w* I
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to( |; z. Z8 @/ j1 k; }& L+ ]
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,# R& [& K- o+ Q) n
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
" Q. Y. |0 O% H( |) J& Sbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
6 B3 z2 Y- z0 l! e# Q) Hproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be$ R/ g) i3 f0 j0 e/ ?
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong6 S- R, _/ O8 c8 E4 u
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
4 F" {% a2 W$ tpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
* o, y9 }1 c0 M6 X! g3 E1 ^; ?torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished i/ @5 }) d; V+ F4 o
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".1 C% _/ y0 p$ z- h% v9 Y: P( Y
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
! W6 Z8 t: k$ baligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially2 G6 {( b8 s6 ~+ R, e
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image0 e0 T' l2 b; |. X
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these$ O9 u0 l* Z6 K: C7 r
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those2 M# Q: c6 N) p/ ~2 r( [
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they8 ]# Z8 ^. K9 |. Z, N
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
% Z- e8 d6 d4 G, \/ A1 Vof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before C- h2 `) t* H; Z8 v9 F* |
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
7 t8 `- y' [% ~2 k Mpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise! \/ P5 u/ J, y7 g' P2 r( C4 P
apartments are the way to go? No.
2 o- b4 n$ |$ ]9 F3 I# V 1 ?. m# y! W$ H' A, u' u3 G) U
+ K/ J; ?4 I+ H2 A5 H
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
5 ]; [: d7 q7 z" R' G# G9 ssituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this7 c4 K' K8 N7 B% |& O2 R
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
" W' t% j/ o7 f' e6 ~5 z: I! Uno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so. c; B. e9 B+ F- l- R: O6 ~
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
N3 Z2 V2 A# n8 C' m5 [resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
' e$ n f3 X$ O( }0 ~4 XBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is r5 f+ m4 ]! \& |% _+ y
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|