UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its0 U) U. r0 V9 p& z+ P
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
4 |; d0 i% c& `3 |Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
( V# h7 y( R P! D- |* R& ccity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
! [7 @' F w3 n' L% k5 pAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
7 \) c Q3 x4 _, U0 M3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of }6 i7 S& Q; s3 c4 @. C
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
/ \0 S2 E" z, x d7 Ghutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among( g- @* C- `: e- q. a2 {/ G
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera7 v3 f4 X' P! Y, S
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is0 b0 r" u, v' F! n) c( o
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
- v6 T2 Y @7 N; h9 x( ?descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
" p: o2 m; g4 {6 k: D' cforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
, e9 m. R7 b* N7 Y8 u# z8 ?was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
& B/ h6 Y( ]; d) X9 \2 eimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
, X+ Z8 ]* O7 C" }and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong5 Q( A8 _8 A5 h
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
, P; V8 i8 q4 m2 m( T Z- p" qof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
: | o; O0 G" w2 G3 G7 A+ J! Ono hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
5 j) J/ Y, l6 K7 o+ conly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a7 V x% G! a5 b* X; v) J& y
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
# J4 q5 p8 r9 Pwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move9 x& s4 D0 d0 K! s3 F) c. {8 S
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
1 N! E T2 m a/ L/ s) e& G"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
* ^! Z# W$ l8 Tthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
- `+ _6 U) O9 ]% M+ P, J% |$ ustill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to! L" A" j0 h) Y
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make) S8 }' d9 o: u3 v/ _
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was' H, x: S8 x3 a. W% _. X/ T
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a0 L6 D% ^2 L, i5 P8 Z
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
) \2 {) P- {0 L. T1 }5 ^' w2 y2 Qthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
" {1 F, e l) y$ Dimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for9 c. _2 D3 [. q9 r2 A: Z
development.
Hutongs. i9 J7 r# [9 X' M2 |
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
9 C" Y* |+ ~; w" |' O& h, N: Ethere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
5 G% ?- \: G3 n( E& nin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
5 G9 U7 ^, z6 d+ O0 R6 N2 }have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
7 I3 I+ D5 V& M% ~' s& xwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
+ ~9 e$ U9 v7 Z0 T. c( K. eFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date( f* X7 B( \$ K4 p ^7 t
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used+ e' m; q# z' B" b7 y; ~- @
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
. A% o0 P2 N3 m; i- Fsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically( ~/ V0 M3 K0 A5 h! k0 f: K& A
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
/ {* x6 Q2 D9 R. Y9 slive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
) z4 v. o. y( j7 x: i# Z; K3 Thutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the0 N, L3 x; a8 |- _# N
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
) @0 e' i0 T) |( M- x" mproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be" s6 `6 z8 c: F4 r
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
8 b/ |2 G6 }0 ]/ Z. {! C/ yMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
+ o! I1 m! Y5 F2 B5 Z R) O% s0 \8 Epeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
( _. @- U% ?; a; c4 b% utorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished$ V4 j& V* i; J; r5 Z; d' o7 V
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
1 F: D: n) U0 h6 F2 X1 r+ S1 g' BNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
9 v% i: P* \4 h$ h- Q2 g& @$ _" Daligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
]* Z+ c H) F7 q2 M @8 ]non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
+ }, d0 M3 r7 ~1 h, ?/ C6 Xof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these G. n6 k9 ?3 z$ V5 [9 O. r* i
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those" S# ?7 o$ A+ t7 j
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they& b8 t4 T5 ~2 N5 e: Q& ]7 d9 Q0 Q2 U
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some; a% {6 o- e# O5 y
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before5 L7 V" ]" H; {$ J i
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all* k/ ]' ]7 @ S; A+ K
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise4 x! V* R' v& b9 R y
apartments are the way to go? No.
" k; D2 G3 @7 ?2 S
4 S0 ^. n& h& H2 {# v % r) p; q! }7 ?5 M4 h- H% o4 c
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
1 V, J. i2 W( U4 M( [+ Gsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this5 ]. x( b8 i7 C3 g0 k9 ?8 K
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
1 _1 m! `% [! ~ h* ]2 f* yno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so9 S6 c0 {! e5 Y
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
; A) P& e. i" dresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless- ?1 a% w6 w* W3 U! r! `
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is2 c" x1 m/ T/ l# L. x
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|