UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its3 @3 ` c' U+ J. h
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider) a1 `' V1 z2 C+ x9 w
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"8 z8 d- g/ H1 O
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
* h# o/ U" U, ^According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty," F8 q% e; k- s4 R; o1 l4 I
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of+ X" S" y5 X+ G1 ]) Y- m
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
/ v( L0 J* N0 i' F1 u8 h2 Mhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
9 k% B% z _+ h+ g5 g8 H+ ?8 @each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera8 V9 y5 ]; q& |6 q4 \6 R
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
, S7 x" A g' J2 lharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
. [. ^ a5 v& Z1 R1 X- T+ ?descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
4 J( `: C( ~+ ]3 j% F+ Zforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I4 H: ?( U2 |1 y& g% X
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
; x$ F! W- }, g- }% uimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
L M0 b5 W \) S$ b, Vand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
! ~' `) ?* w" q) mhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
3 A d8 V+ x! S& @0 Iof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
1 b8 @ n% q0 M: k' @no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
0 S' t, B7 Q9 U4 D7 ?8 y. qonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
1 w( D% B4 [ Y6 Z# a* u- N" msort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government- ?- z% {$ g- D* c3 W
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
" o8 z' c2 E& ~/ ]6 Wto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is- Q6 z: U$ h- D
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
5 W" a8 B$ \% O1 O6 D% C% Zthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are; e" G- N2 X+ [3 v4 {
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to' w: y% j. x |5 z0 y1 A6 |( V
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
* J( D5 ]; ^: Y& I$ }money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was' M& s, ], h3 C! x6 E
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a4 s2 Q- o# ~) M; v
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across2 q* g& c" y- G {. o: J+ U4 }5 r
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural$ w, p, d& B* _9 L+ K
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for2 ?# V" m; f1 Y& k# ?, W/ S
development.
Hutongs
1 d$ |8 H3 ^1 l3 u3 ^in the old days were residential area where people actually lived \1 z4 L5 F. X" B Y
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions/ C) j9 j1 M" P1 Y
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
$ L# B4 k! v. r2 y, l( r. Hhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
2 I- \& f! |* s$ x/ O! wwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
: f [' q# w$ l! \; ^8 J1 q% pFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date8 s; b/ s) m) s: i' O; V4 X
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used. n4 o, T: o( S( f( Y8 c! D
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses. t4 {/ n) q5 ]" M
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically& O- c0 \8 e7 h% S8 b" k
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to' q+ j- `$ D! p/ @; k% O. Y6 H0 y
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,/ T! J% }5 T2 |" E2 U" d9 |
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
! x' }$ f7 a6 r( g* Jbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the0 Z8 ^# D8 }8 ^( E! i: c
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
: l7 x/ q! x9 N! Yrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
0 z$ }1 Z" v7 n8 P6 ?Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how: i) ?9 I; u9 F1 i1 c Z$ o
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
5 g' s0 e; a; C6 g/ g( Ltorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
) o- s3 F0 a7 wmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
7 @9 d2 O' D: yNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are6 |# D' U$ P, P2 |1 Z
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
6 U2 b! c; j. S0 ?non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
! U* `9 f0 C1 t: ~ L3 Z- {of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
L9 a0 J( d* h; a1 w3 l0 |: u$ GHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those8 V6 e6 g+ l6 j# A: ~2 U# e/ t
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
7 {2 A4 h7 Q: c# Q0 k; C& H- y+ Qmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
. {% Q- F" ^3 i& O* R3 qof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
5 }: q% ~% g p# Z% X$ Y" q"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
5 T( N w7 P0 V7 ^ n; ?people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise: f: d. c% e7 i9 j4 t5 _
apartments are the way to go? No.1 c; }- I/ a" |
w" E7 C/ d1 v0 ^6 B7 n6 g
. X) V! m+ z; Z7 b, G# _
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
+ _- S1 E2 n% c) w: t2 E6 Dsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
/ O) D0 @1 A2 G4 V, ]4 c. G'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
" p# J, p5 u6 F4 L8 f/ L! n: n! M, c; ^no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so- i4 y- J# f3 U4 R4 T& j3 L
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
2 I0 g+ p9 ?3 n" g& J# x7 _resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless' m+ i8 m& d7 v: `8 N: j* ~
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is+ i2 k$ k! d' i2 V- E. r6 j
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|