UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its- I, h. H' \5 B+ k
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
) m+ r2 y0 U. LBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"0 E- _* Z& [2 ~5 j* y7 u5 n
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
# j' O. a' N8 t* sAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty," b" `6 X$ Q) u6 }
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of R7 t+ t; J" Y6 x6 ^4 P, z- |
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
7 o0 p: }2 I* k9 hhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
4 e" u2 }+ \, q1 u! z$ teach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera: O7 v. a! H) T P
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
# r8 X0 g# s+ h" }. F4 sharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are3 W3 K* f0 g/ k
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
" x7 h8 F5 H1 A& D1 Z/ pforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I( N9 H# L5 F0 _6 i* F ~9 t$ }
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great. }, h& }4 ?. e5 Z" v4 |* t
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,) M$ J; H9 Y- m$ \+ u
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong6 s) T$ _( ^2 g
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment/ D' H: e) ^2 |+ q9 Q: E+ G
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
: H! m& X! R+ w# f7 r% n& {no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
8 ~ d8 ]# p3 `6 ]/ q# u; S, O' }2 wonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
# ~$ Y2 ]7 E5 L$ K( ~: Dsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
) w# _; K# P: {# n4 pwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move- L% U7 k$ G8 y5 [7 g
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is) [+ C& k' }. X3 u
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,) U. s+ G g. e1 r9 T7 v1 s2 n
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
: g! t0 h) S- m% _. p O. @8 \" l' Pstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
, `/ G2 X5 _( T, \/ i( o: g"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make" Q9 H# @+ O9 E* K* j
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was+ q/ ]2 x2 ?% c5 w
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a n3 k+ [8 A% ^1 H
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across: W, j$ Q+ `! v. G
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
! ^6 E+ ]& D1 `# \ uimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for: K: ? T& p5 H/ o& c/ c7 l& e* `5 f
development.
Hutongs
; Q' A' C$ F; Z' D' |! Jin the old days were residential area where people actually lived3 v" w' N( g; o. L
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
6 i2 P3 b+ [2 Tin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not. j* _# ^$ D, W8 q8 t% J
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you Q$ n2 c- G7 A0 Z
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
2 ~7 @& S( g# t( p' [0 d& |, v! DFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
9 H2 N4 }$ x1 Q* s& _to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used9 [+ ?0 R. \: a# l5 i7 k( ^8 c
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
; {6 n7 v) C! q$ N- Gsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
+ s# @: @% h+ e- `unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to5 Q. z1 D O9 x3 T7 Q
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
- E) V; l( O5 m( Z8 ]7 ~hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the2 v; @" v2 ^/ L l4 F5 G
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the/ H% }" z8 b$ @4 u- o: s2 ~
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be" j) E* |/ @/ z5 `& o# @
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
/ [4 s+ u* P2 t" IMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
7 ?/ L6 ]! c# s2 h- x! o$ F4 Ppeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be1 r& q, ?3 k* _! ^8 C
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished4 U r) |7 B+ g Q, L8 Y' Q! X
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".) x4 Z; Z/ q- b
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are) Z6 @+ `4 g$ i3 ]; R6 k! `
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially* ]1 P* O9 E. k/ `9 s9 X
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
8 h; O& f$ P) Z+ _of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
) c% Q6 J4 r: l( |" GHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
% g9 J9 [$ Q1 T$ I& b h' opeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they2 t0 g7 D7 @7 W, B
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
* x" o0 o* Q4 t$ W$ M; wof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before$ t5 o Y9 E0 P# J) Z' v. O
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all, w( H4 Q" _; h
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
( M6 T3 |- O, F/ ?5 wapartments are the way to go? No.
- @$ O& u; C7 Z6 x' f 9 }$ y9 ?5 N2 A& n
" I. J, ]$ D7 x: S3 B
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the! N% i2 s$ j/ k& ^ ~* ]3 Z
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
* a# E2 J2 u% x, k, Z. O'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make" p; [% _- _( B
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
( F$ g: p# t9 q6 ]9 s5 lfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant* X! y" o* ~' Y1 Q& h
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
2 d3 T9 }5 y5 E! H0 f+ [Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is6 s$ K, ]2 x* Q$ I2 i( I/ {
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|