服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6381|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its9 z" |2 O- d( |8 L architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider $ h/ T( l2 j. lBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"' d0 Z# V2 h, B+ _ city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.: B* J. @, ~; }! n According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,0 M: v: c. x0 k9 J: E; a% Z: c( k 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of + }: k" M0 I# Y# q1 {& q' y6 xManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within / |" S: x9 Q5 o5 |! N1 \4 S' ihutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among4 b T! |8 {( @3 H- M each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera0 R. G- \4 z8 C/ a- P8 ] and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 5 @: l, P& K7 \7 ~harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are. }, E r- H0 r! k4 j( ]# P# Y descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and % d' [- G6 A; r/ n. \; aforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I* O' Q6 |1 R; L |4 P: i% \ was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great ; }' W5 e# a$ ]4 w$ Limpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,/ i F# t6 Y$ X) T" ] and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong- D* R+ ?( `8 g# \ has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment , }$ w; g) W! \" r/ V7 g- ]3 eof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that8 z8 Z8 ~6 N1 g" t. V Y0 P8 Q% L z" L no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 7 }5 ] c; P9 |, E/ Z2 a5 j9 m4 F6 uonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 6 m, I- N* `5 C/ C1 p% l5 {& |sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government. K! h2 X2 d0 a( t want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move % R+ u/ ?4 R" i: Y) b( ito the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ' y0 d, V4 L1 Y/ Y& A7 r$ n# c0 f"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, " W$ _8 Q/ m+ [3 X1 q$ }/ Wthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are Z7 X+ V% {1 ]' B' M% x0 Dstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to( N' i8 I8 e& D, S5 r# f! w: l: @5 v "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make5 y3 W3 ?/ _8 ?1 g" b% Q, ^' U money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was2 V/ W6 h I+ y6 x2 { @2 j. H, A a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a+ I' p$ T7 H7 U, H- }0 L- Q& ^ parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across( H( m# {( [& r5 v the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural* Q1 J5 ` V6 ]. T- s. C8 \7 n importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for! |/ e7 c# E. G& K. p development.

Hutongs 7 F0 F+ b m( P8 p" tin the old days were residential area where people actually lived 5 a6 `" \! s+ @- T$ j4 o& Qthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions : T0 |6 }# S. D' h7 Zin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ) J# G. S. M5 ^1 Q9 |have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you" f2 V" `" L; Q9 B# b+ Z( _ will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.) ~& s; h6 n. m' j/ O0 U Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date% z3 }' q3 ?8 Y$ u* l7 i3 p' [ to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used) R: B0 z' s; r, Y$ T to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 9 c8 }. s0 m2 Wsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically) a/ A7 s" w2 l1 e unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 5 W" R& C; V/ B9 R- p& elive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 1 g8 m0 I7 g' g0 R$ b) f6 Uhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the$ n' g4 @, F. {0 y1 Q2 E$ \ balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the) w0 M! o5 l) h4 Z. t project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 5 G1 ?/ L6 y9 ?" S) H9 I1 Wrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 5 U5 K2 D9 V. Z0 G2 kMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how& D) t# ?) d; s' \4 o people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be: ^: j2 l0 U K: d0 j; g* L* F& I torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished * V, [& J; E- _8 Ememories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". ! m3 ?* ]' ~+ PNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are( L) J, R* k, E$ V aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially! C" R8 u8 F u% z non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image% i5 ^& m0 P: U+ A1 _! R# Z of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these' P: l5 O/ @2 \ P* O# h7 j Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those * D, v O: g+ Fpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they: X9 J; r2 `, g! W may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 2 m5 E9 J/ p7 m7 x3 C. ~4 h4 W/ Mof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before " q* h6 S L( D8 y"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 0 `+ V6 B' J* r9 t( l$ Xpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise- u2 d! ]2 T: A0 I1 s- i apartments are the way to go? No." i' y$ k8 l7 C; I8 d' | 9 G! G7 b9 O0 a0 @1 g ; _" r3 D+ ?, l

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the) \0 p& n* \& c* [: Z8 h situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this! U( T; u" T$ D8 s+ G' S, v 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make2 R) d0 }# J- m2 q0 h no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so/ [9 X2 q/ S& H, g# r fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ( G- n% i" k/ j+ }resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless- @ E; }9 T* p# I' r8 z Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is $ D1 Q( @& _# dunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-8 04:38 , Processed in 0.124896 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部