服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6312|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its9 b+ h; }6 S' T# X2 b7 o8 k architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 4 K2 T3 E- w% f, @8 l: nBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"( M& n( f+ j- O0 b! b, B city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.- m4 v' L: j- D According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, " |/ x+ A% V" V3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of / E# ~+ h' B0 A8 {1 m( R: ^Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within/ N2 w; Q9 l$ z5 k) h e hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among R; L1 E7 v6 { each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera U- S1 E/ e v# U& P O. A' J and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is - ` H. d1 Z0 f& c/ G" |" |1 t* Mharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are+ O' o) |3 _3 B0 b descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and! _- ^( l: g$ P& T( Y forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ( B' K* `- ]2 R: W% g, `was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great9 \* V0 W5 W) n0 x6 H( H1 k+ s impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, " K& U& p3 y4 L7 q1 P; S' G' N xand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong h0 q) k: L3 l! Y has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment k; k8 X% J9 S$ i. @! h) r of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that . g' C! O3 k' q: j# Y* `no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 3 m9 Y$ {, W' O7 I1 L1 Oonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a " K6 e# p( p# I6 _+ osort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government & s" d) F! K$ `; E: C6 Cwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move' [) x& `1 |# F2 X to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is $ U9 {+ W$ }2 B0 Y"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, / k- u0 s2 q& r B! D6 d2 o( j) G5 athis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are2 ~# H& E/ ^4 q still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ' J d" ~: {- y& g6 D"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make2 u" }5 q9 T1 T7 K1 m& b+ t! { money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was ! V# Y5 ^6 n; N% S! ia beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a3 ]0 k9 M2 o% k) p3 _* I parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across* }4 b# f6 }( r the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural: E6 v- a+ a6 J7 N0 V0 U. {/ O importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for& L$ Y# r; D/ O6 ]; G development.

Hutongs , A) l0 G, F/ W, j; r' s" I. Pin the old days were residential area where people actually lived 9 C( T' U+ C( E0 O5 Rthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions/ n% x. c; k5 V( @ in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not" Y B- I2 x8 W5 a# d b have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you" ^' [6 y) V% t* j' k will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 6 w; `/ N, T; [5 L+ SFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date' h& `) t0 K+ M9 R) t4 D to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used; h! C3 B- P8 {8 P! k! n to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses % |) l8 s1 O# f* Y* \2 Usupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically* l5 u+ G, ]8 U# m1 h unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to / S/ W) ?. X2 a ylive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, & H3 z9 o) A* @3 d6 h6 n! shutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the# ?. Z# w+ I% p+ v3 n: U# K- W7 w balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the% U( u" B3 R% S9 L F7 R project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be; D. |& v/ X; N& \; m" X renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong& m- w# |& h1 A' W Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how7 P( r: e$ G, g people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be ; Y& d- }2 `6 i0 ztorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished# \( N& o$ F: a( |" p& ~ memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".$ I2 |" E& i$ h9 B K2 Y6 w Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are" P# z& o1 Z2 P# h* x- x aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially; @5 y# Q [! e( h3 I! ?* x non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image $ l# P! g) d# Oof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these$ C3 f, \6 W e( T9 g Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those9 M4 I' u `1 L9 L" s people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they [" Z; h9 w3 ~! B may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ! s7 _ E* }: Sof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before4 r7 @7 K7 E5 }; w "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all! c. p! r5 t9 s8 G2 h people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise6 r% }; J1 t& [& z% V. P apartments are the way to go? No. $ [1 }+ z; Y* b ( o# Q7 C& `- Z( T3 c 3 [8 L7 t. i8 ~. j

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 0 d1 x+ J' e( Y, P' Wsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this & a1 `6 m: h; ]0 |2 _! n3 Y'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make2 s# r& y% I2 J no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ) O/ r+ R6 a2 H4 q) C. o) xfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 0 o8 ?7 L o' _* w4 K2 \& d+ Wresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless8 f1 {: g( I6 T' Y' j8 } Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is , b4 P0 E6 @4 K8 \unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-23 21:57 , Processed in 0.165120 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部