服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6269|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ! {8 H8 ^( ~- S3 V2 varchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider8 L, I+ S* A, V c5 d$ K7 N! G Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"$ Y, W1 G: {6 W+ v' q city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.! q" S4 n! ?7 [8 \ According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,% [) v" ~( B3 w0 C4 R$ K 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of* I) y3 n- w) d( b, k Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within + N9 C( y- q, C2 ?* d3 G, Jhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among$ H9 S* O* a) @8 D! l% k each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera0 f2 [) o2 P2 ~* k/ B {# [ and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 8 e) J+ D5 V g! tharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are % k9 R9 R1 U1 Z" Wdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and! G% a" d9 @& h9 c6 `% ~ forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I - [* S1 [* ~# o/ p7 ~- o$ Ywas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great - c( F8 T3 ~9 a; _5 \' I. qimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 1 F; i/ o M0 wand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 4 d( Y3 h4 x. Z0 x- ?has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment* n( N0 @ N+ q6 u2 R; a of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that1 J4 m: d( X7 F {, w8 S5 \0 [ no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are `0 h& R, c# v+ nonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a; K A" N& S2 T: {& P4 _* R2 o sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government1 [+ Q3 Z! @( f6 x0 T0 B want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move1 [& p$ `( P. I1 U! A# {) \2 t to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is8 }7 A( o% e9 U- O "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, + B1 @6 t6 H+ {( N, O9 A2 qthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are $ X$ z' @* I+ c. a: [; Astill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to $ J# z# _( l5 U9 h+ q/ |( O$ H"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make' f0 z g, S* M" C) ] money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 5 ~: K4 a: \+ Fa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a ]4 C9 N, |6 o8 O: f7 Iparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across% h, Y! f4 |/ `9 R) w the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ' I+ l# q7 U5 A3 Y, m* ^) J1 _, Limportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for( t2 v {* A5 S# @. @# M+ _ V1 p development.

Hutongs * S: i3 w7 X8 c- {6 ?! z" Pin the old days were residential area where people actually lived 3 }+ d7 }: b, ^6 b1 y( Pthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 4 R/ _8 O; M" j5 @in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not& ?! g3 M5 C7 B* P have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you1 r4 E) d' J4 |6 D' T |7 M9 { will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.; i- H' T! i. E- J- @5 j B) o Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date, c( q4 |' v" C8 f5 d to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used; ?5 q( R9 M& R y$ s# b4 B' t9 E to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 7 D9 F% c! q4 |7 E9 e" Ksupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically) }* W k0 d6 a( ~3 o# V9 b; R unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to. ]$ A, r3 g; m live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 8 @2 O) @/ E/ n k% W- H+ Mhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the- Y0 ^6 X1 h- W balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the0 I$ V. x: h5 M1 g+ ^- Z project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be * Z+ V; \6 ^: ?* ^+ f: Krenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong. t' h* b6 L) f Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 5 X" V7 j, _/ r6 ~: X( G$ Dpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be* T2 T1 B- d! |) f2 h) P. J$ T2 a; ^9 q8 N torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 1 W: ?+ O N% {- e( ^, F$ Gmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". & h9 @5 U3 \ G4 R3 FNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 3 D# |: ^: K5 A) c& kaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially3 ?' l' Q& l: d' J/ K% c8 b non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image9 b% v; ]" C0 U, o0 _; @ of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 5 Y3 Z2 v! b a' `Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those, K* r6 r2 p. @" P2 z" \8 J' Z people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they) v3 @: D$ Z$ e0 e& B5 M may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some' A; R8 w( Z7 P d5 s, [8 N, R of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before$ z# l0 R. W0 \ "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all/ p. j8 [7 ?- w% q# m- {( L people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise * I. M& ^! [( u* p9 S6 lapartments are the way to go? No. # z* A+ F9 X9 R4 | " d; d' M5 |' d$ z. \ & F5 U8 R) A6 R

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the / b9 o/ P$ o/ \5 f+ k" {& Ksituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this1 B b: B0 v) w: t& p. S 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make# S$ W, e) n: a) y7 G no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so- n8 I! @( }7 s9 s5 `% o fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 7 F0 }% @9 q, a ^: p1 u$ ~8 Qresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless( G. ~5 H7 x* E4 Z. L Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 9 E9 o w _! n* J* h' G2 Q8 Cunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-9 18:55 , Processed in 0.119546 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部