服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6600|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its( u% A) T1 [- a( e6 D architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider ' f1 h$ r; H; f! fBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"0 {- b/ w% L4 k' G! Y, k city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.. T. W) H; u6 u9 _9 ~+ a3 p According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,, e) n9 L, Z4 I) l+ S 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of * r7 ?5 ~' ?2 K$ @5 z/ {/ xManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 8 L+ @: D3 b% w& X/ K0 ~hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 4 q* q/ x" `! _; Y3 |0 Beach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera9 l8 I" Q: |) n q1 b and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is+ i" f- d) M9 v" w' t harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are; \6 R: E8 A4 z7 P* v! @ descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and) R5 j- E+ r: T) ]4 m# {) a* a. B" Y forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 0 L/ A' e7 _: N" i' i t( Q' owas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 7 U5 x: N1 C3 s9 ^impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,# z; k1 W0 a/ C+ S2 B, K2 _ and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong7 {1 {: C2 O1 [" b3 I has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment2 r6 n6 |- c" C* r3 v! o/ @1 L of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that * r; F& L- X: B2 o/ q3 ?8 Ino hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are q4 {" k% F, L4 X% Bonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a- A! x1 \/ y# \" R& F" h sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government+ R1 O' v7 p( \ want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move $ x/ s9 F8 m" R! n# P. \" F3 m8 {0 Lto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is% y C) y2 a- s+ o# f0 o( u) `1 g "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ! T- h: B9 { l8 e Ithis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are Y0 e! I4 R4 Nstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to % s8 L. r7 {$ q$ U) P: T. ~"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make4 ~7 D; u2 p" k3 m: E/ U money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was & u0 `! k5 G" G( x$ v* J va beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 6 v" Q; k( W1 E. L# M! w; Eparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 6 C) l$ V/ g% D# Z1 m) p" @the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural( R. N" z1 B! |, n, Z" J% u6 V importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for. u, q: \' q `) m! y( D- p7 g development.

Hutongs3 i: d+ }, p- j Q' r2 ~ in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 4 J! C% I8 S6 R( Z7 I' vthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions , N, q* C4 ^' W! ?3 S" ~. r) Cin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not" T d" a% H# y$ { have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ; ^& x+ d3 h: Q" M5 Z# ~will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 7 T7 g( U) l& e8 a/ T6 gFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date# Q9 A# J- G. C+ h' ^ to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used2 d( O% A" w% H to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 5 C$ Y z4 _. `& Ssupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically- U( b; h, S$ w1 @, q( l8 ]/ z' y unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to" a9 X5 N6 f- e2 E" g" u live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, , x6 \5 C4 B P; e: khutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the " r) H+ p: U# n) P# \0 J/ \+ e$ Fbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the ; a2 F6 |) h' c4 W* I6 p- n% iproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be2 z) T$ w9 D" k7 G+ _3 I renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong ; [0 } Q; n7 ?5 yMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how ! f! Z% V7 g. q' |& M: jpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be) P4 B# [) y. _& r torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 9 J9 q6 {% h" r' {memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". $ N: S K" e; D5 r1 {9 TNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are& d" _. l, ^* y% w9 a& P aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 4 R. `! D5 _! |( v/ dnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image. u( C4 U; _; X4 s" E. Z of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these' M5 i; O* X I, N0 q' g0 J6 u Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those& G; B2 p+ q9 p' N- ^9 p- B people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they . H; d2 t" E8 S" d/ X2 O2 ~may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some - W" u+ K J2 `4 @! s. U7 Lof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ! b1 X# i/ _/ {9 ]' F( J"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all+ [: u% c7 N( [5 b& J people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise * ?( m% F+ [+ j i1 G! yapartments are the way to go? No.0 O- M! ^/ L* |* y: e6 _ 8 O8 C6 u( t1 n0 k, E' I $ g' y; j5 R& b

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the9 m! R3 m# J/ r3 [ situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 7 ^6 P; h: O6 y9 }2 w' H8 b6 E'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make . m' \0 Q8 S. c. cno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so $ |5 r$ P. J, m2 I! u% F- q0 \! hfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant/ @9 Y4 v4 a w# R, n( A e; @ resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless % |/ B3 J9 A0 _6 c# f( w' T* QBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is $ j+ B2 {6 `* x( Q' I4 funlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-30 12:44 , Processed in 0.141294 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部