服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6737|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its6 k% M' s# O: d" X5 [% [ architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider9 k9 v0 Q4 ^* p Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" . _1 j4 R5 c% k. f! Ycity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.5 m/ H6 j' q, v" a According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 0 z" u q# E$ n9 C5 Z/ B' O3 T3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of8 P% r9 ^0 s& B E( y% Q Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 8 l7 @0 f0 \) z! d0 Z7 qhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 8 z( p" u% k$ Q4 h V" O% Neach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera + k2 m# L& d/ E. V7 ]1 rand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is - x2 x0 D& O9 A: _$ @harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ! M0 i: P; v# O. Tdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and , }3 w' k/ t$ s: k8 x4 ^; J7 Wforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 6 y; T6 S# K3 r! U* h! L' {$ Pwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great5 K/ c, g6 q% u7 T4 ^! O2 h; i, u; k impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,$ _) b$ ]6 J& ~ and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong7 j, h6 P( X# d3 Z: O has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment$ H9 w5 \1 e( g5 C/ `* }8 N of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that3 m+ G6 B& E3 ~ no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ( t$ `1 @/ }8 g2 eonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a/ V& H- b/ [0 l sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 4 ^ ^. Z0 ^3 N* O" V# T& _* swant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 4 ?2 v8 L j' Q* o# o* q2 zto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 4 W0 r" {4 R5 ^"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, - U% r' b- q+ @* J. w9 {! J( bthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are% w" e+ f" o8 f" f" K still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to( G, s0 ]* v" d: @' t "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make & _2 e4 p' V4 U1 A/ Imoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was # w: H3 b! a! T7 g8 Va beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a3 p1 U+ I6 k" S8 T. r2 { parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across - W4 N7 u! m; _the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural0 m8 J2 u! t0 R4 ~; A3 v: S+ e importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for! x0 }0 `/ i6 g& H; [& \9 d development.

Hutongs * U1 ]9 p+ {1 M0 b. W7 o8 z6 b! ^in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 5 `; v! e* Q. B4 @& ^there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 5 J3 p4 t& }4 x2 S) R( @in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not Z, t$ y" x# b/ w5 \8 E- p& xhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 1 Q V3 l& m8 f+ ~- J9 C% @will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. - r. _" J. i. _ h; rFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date + A3 O, g/ C; u; Yto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used : V, H: f# @- C" h1 q" E/ x3 Sto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses9 J9 q2 z _* t. I! G+ m& r- } support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically" I' G/ n( l1 A: ]9 O unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to; Y& p2 R/ c" v8 }2 n4 a7 Z# B live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,2 K* `$ J9 T" z' `, Y7 X hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the * j" [4 D. F5 m* [balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the. r0 w! E& O2 `2 L& {. s) p+ a project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be . k1 K) c1 W3 @- Xrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 0 j( y: c H+ w: ~" o/ X+ [+ b9 U. wMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how + h" g! e! _* Dpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be # [) O$ u2 u3 _, S* F* v/ Atorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 6 F9 u8 E8 Y5 i/ ?( @memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".5 T3 U4 M8 w. x- n+ m$ Y Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are $ {% M/ G/ B, q$ {, Yaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially + ~8 y/ Q8 r2 h: O% `1 hnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image9 X( e" @# ?: Z$ u5 v/ C of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these $ m( K- ]: U. R/ ~. }Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those C6 I3 `3 X' ~0 X, ~people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they! l& `1 J# I0 [& `5 e may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 5 }) Q* `. k3 L7 qof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before; u8 o( j0 X' Y7 r1 c; ]: I( J5 e) G "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 0 Y; Q0 \0 @8 T1 xpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise5 p1 o. H8 F( _" ?( \; A( m apartments are the way to go? No.# s4 c5 |8 o+ V4 f f/ t6 Q 3 h# c% _. X( v. o / ~# U0 W: k- o6 w4 ]! d) o" ^* d, s

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the. J9 S1 w# p) x- O situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this S. P5 C) {4 x6 f: S, F$ @3 `'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make / O7 V6 u* |# f7 D+ M& W! ?no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so+ n2 t% c2 h* ~8 J# `- ~. t) m fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant $ M" C8 A! y! s4 uresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless/ m4 z& m7 b( k& O: C9 u9 J Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is/ e5 ]% `- J- V* Z4 I unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-15 07:39 , Processed in 0.111669 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部