服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6671|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its % N1 w; B; j, K' J* g) N# z0 h1 parchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider & y3 m9 d9 H( J% w& MBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" U) N! V8 R" T" O7 gcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. / J. H% C _" _( a: UAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,6 _, o4 Q3 b. n$ V 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of0 C3 D$ M$ E3 n5 }& V Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within3 C2 f# [* x5 e! W/ R4 m( \ hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among3 W( G$ N8 v) [$ }* ~5 p% l each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera. W) o8 g2 R, ^, e+ q" l6 b and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is) x# ~5 ^- q$ H4 W harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are; ~7 r+ ^0 y$ h* @' P' w- W2 c descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and p0 n. h" W3 a7 G$ R$ }forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 8 C: ~' p4 C. k. wwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great " ^9 N" r7 @* L3 c( Mimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ' r6 a U5 ^% ?2 fand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong. d' }1 U% w, u8 e has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ! r3 W, C2 i7 ^! e( fof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 2 \. ^6 {3 _. [; b+ P. m) Q: Ino hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are( n4 {* S& H/ V* S* u' O8 m! y6 x only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a) b$ o$ ?. r4 E- @$ K! ] sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 5 T( D9 Q5 V* Xwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move8 @" I& Z! L6 i5 q- d to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is , p, O6 |5 [/ t' V1 S"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, / \% t" L7 O M" p8 U# \! Z' ]this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are . @& B8 ~! f9 E# W2 n) _still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 8 L0 {5 I- t" _, o4 n5 H% E0 ]"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make, M+ f$ }8 k2 Z0 Y$ P5 v Y( A money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was, ]* x. a8 p/ M# k a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a / F8 V" m" }$ J+ H9 F* I9 Pparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across$ l( T" ]4 r* O& X the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural/ d% B! l, D4 V' i; h importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for : E) I9 M2 n$ R! g! T2 K# cdevelopment.

Hutongs. N& \9 _5 s: d/ p$ J in the old days were residential area where people actually lived \; s+ B# {& v( dthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions4 d- v+ q* U$ b$ V- K: s in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not + I1 f" k( [2 {2 xhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 6 _9 l5 n4 A+ r0 rwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.2 U* m2 z9 p- ^$ I Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date4 P% ?, T( b7 g( q6 ~ to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used& C5 B- }; f7 I7 \( s to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses & X* Z! A3 O( Z4 F( p8 tsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically, ]' u& R$ [1 D) a: [" ^: ^ unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 9 f/ I8 ]3 [; o0 q' e q! Vlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, % w* K F, u% i% w& ~% y' Mhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 5 [, o5 }' l: `0 Q. |balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the * K3 Z$ C% u0 p3 Lproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be / |+ S8 f) c% G5 [renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong& \9 {; a( N9 u; k Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how; y- i: ^' H9 e2 x% z ? people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 7 J% A5 m, F' X/ Q: { h5 E1 C7 Ktorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished # x4 w( R5 E/ K2 |: e imemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".. Y1 o0 e) o. P( j! r+ w Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ) V' S6 W; Y G+ j7 ]aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 2 X" B+ y6 y5 w5 p7 P8 X8 j; ]" T( s+ [' Anon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image8 ?% s1 ]9 |8 I5 f4 w of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these & H `* n) k" K) F- r0 vHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those6 e- `1 M# t2 }. g people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they. ^& D8 J+ C' U may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some n5 [; N6 w8 e/ L+ e. Lof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before * i5 o& }. C6 @: B$ U1 }- B5 E"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all % p9 F* l+ {' Z# v5 t) A5 epeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise: J ?0 G+ _9 F0 Q, ?8 l: M3 X apartments are the way to go? No. ! X$ M/ }" v! D 1 Q* }; j9 l7 d# o & T( n% j$ F' ]

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the + b$ a/ f4 z6 R: y/ A* [3 osituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ' M% E: Q* C! E8 W" }'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 6 G5 \7 u+ N/ A& G8 h9 R0 K0 H2 |) Ano money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so7 A8 d9 N5 ]' y- ?' ?9 Y1 z fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant! k$ | |% D k1 l+ M( v resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless % R2 B" D, e) ^- d4 \Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is5 S- Y3 h6 a1 P. c1 R& Y, @, J9 w unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-8 08:56 , Processed in 0.115637 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部