UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
6 O( I& d( t7 Q5 c8 Oarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider u7 D$ a: u5 N& z$ U) [
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"# I: | A& n7 k& j" ~2 h! R
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
/ {' H$ R/ _ ^: g; DAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
- L+ Z, {# g& B3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of) M. |8 y+ L- }% k
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within4 J, I( R0 I+ }1 P ~
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among1 z n. O7 A- a$ W
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
8 D0 p( d! @# a1 m; g; hand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is" T$ O& X) k- C, o
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
" ]. m3 K" g2 X8 `$ `0 kdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and( d* K; F& _% a& m# M2 h: A
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I" v& G( R1 ~- G% d- T, F
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great, p' ]+ X" G! D4 Y) t: Z
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, I* } D5 \' |; a$ K! c
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
/ F& ]8 U1 F/ L" Dhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment5 R& ?9 P2 ~2 L" Y, \
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
4 p2 _8 g5 D' Jno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are: ]. y' W' g7 e0 A) k- ]
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
$ [# S" o. U( q9 A, g% {sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
7 q5 l) _. G, b; v& m1 o9 @" `# _want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move, n: l0 f7 [9 w# B B" p$ J Z
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
. m+ y/ F Q' _"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,( C3 R* x0 l9 W8 T
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
! p: _0 B! R( H" }5 w4 @7 Hstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
! P. O4 M' a" x5 \* R$ }) G"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
) q+ D7 @3 x# d! jmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was! H- r* w7 H- c7 l
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
+ @& |. r: C4 Q1 ^parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
* e, V' h# n8 y% d4 q1 ~the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural$ C/ k/ W) S' d" U
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for8 \% Q/ {- Z) l4 u0 y5 P- U
development.
Hutongs( g* M9 Z$ [4 x0 l/ f/ \
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived+ a$ T7 X3 y! q J3 i( `
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions6 C) Y$ X' k* F8 i; i4 t& H/ n
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
3 e) O X0 }& zhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
" j1 M/ V! T! `' ywill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.8 |9 S2 w, t$ j) W2 \
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date. _6 n0 T; \0 d, H3 q
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used/ i# E4 Q6 }4 r
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses7 J; O6 @ h$ V- V+ Q5 B& w
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically2 E2 y$ w4 b: ~, u' R
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to0 W/ L( M+ ~# X( q- D* D
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,. r' D! f8 w" s% F D& W, `
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
9 r% h, y) H( W. p; l ibalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the; y( G; g) X& D# T3 u2 D, X, d
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be7 X( R5 D4 R9 k% L3 s
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
( h2 p1 t+ ~) gMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how% \: E- f, L U% g8 [" ?9 I; v
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
: d9 i! ^7 u5 R* vtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished# b5 L* c1 @! p
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
6 O* ?( _* Q7 r/ x. @( dNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are$ T* P8 Y& O" c1 \$ H2 E+ a' Z
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
* x" B. L' v- h- b9 Fnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image2 W4 r7 z3 h% Z9 s( x
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these* d& |! o/ m( ^
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
' C" n. {- M- W4 y: |4 G# [) Q4 speople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
8 o' s' U) @7 w' h8 V6 s% Wmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
7 \ Z" e" J8 E- }of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
7 B9 V7 B$ U; a! F) ["modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all6 F& G7 Z) _( R7 G; r: a" {
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
7 C1 o' Q5 W: w) p) iapartments are the way to go? No.; j7 u9 s3 |/ z$ `
* R, p3 t( W2 r$ X
( x# L% b7 s& Z
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
% R! E9 d4 e' a- Y% N5 [5 Isituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
( @- w" B) a* N8 w5 \'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make7 N" v0 L: x0 X( i
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so* u' k% h9 G+ B* L) K
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant; ?& i# o( G( {" a" a
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless5 D! W& y( R) w
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
2 H( K- l% `2 \$ Yunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|