服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6679|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 5 |9 C5 a; k2 J ~9 Aarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider1 C! _1 z' _* _; J8 _% F1 ~ Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 4 }" B5 f* T, I( J6 G, Rcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture., l1 ?; }8 X8 N According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, & E6 i3 J+ B; R% Z3 A0 W! f! N3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of n: W/ C/ k0 `+ I$ v& V& ]Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within ( o# y; M8 N. c# F+ p: p% Y2 ?hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 7 }1 e5 b( |9 M q( e+ o' ceach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera & J" Z. L, G' M. f; a; k! v( Jand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is& D! P% {0 j/ D, l harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ( `' R5 m4 u, P0 K' t. ]5 o* Vdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and ' }0 r1 M: _" g9 yforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I & I9 O! N3 d: Y( H8 b Iwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great- y: s9 x$ z5 D; C! p impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,2 d7 I' O9 L$ p1 Z) a! p3 ? and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong7 s0 k9 d' I1 v- r7 e3 e) N2 ^ has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment9 s/ k* Y M+ P! s of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that. d* ~* x5 y: x$ r7 r no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are % A" e+ n; x1 o' aonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a * L3 c2 @7 K% a2 s3 T% n/ @sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government , {3 X3 c2 Y+ mwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move7 C2 n; z6 Z2 u2 T- ? to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 2 p' W# K2 D! i7 e/ ?"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, % T; X$ G; h! ~* [ Fthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ' l) V$ m3 k, i1 r& I% tstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 9 A) D7 m2 g% c"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make* P0 G0 u3 z u% Y7 T5 ^1 X money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 3 p% _) e r( w# s; o \' o) wa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a # r0 q/ C+ i8 K* Nparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across. l% o% \9 A) p$ Y the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural( M. n7 Z( I" e, k# ^3 E! f importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for , _/ D I3 ]$ W# E- A0 edevelopment.

Hutongs0 M6 t1 Y3 S1 _. l+ F in the old days were residential area where people actually lived / a. `) C3 G5 mthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions1 i f; x. o5 u- _. I4 Z in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ( |* b8 c" H/ H( O/ b- Yhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you8 ^7 ` F9 w$ Z will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 5 v! g7 m5 ]! E* i5 \Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date# `# V) y! O- @ to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used/ R7 A: Y% K+ P1 e$ q' Z to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses1 Y+ p+ C- z% Z) c support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically , I# d5 m$ R! C4 t! Uunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to " ?) u+ Z1 f0 v plive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,, q% @! q, Y0 n, p- L. f7 c6 T hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the. ~$ I- l) Z# `! p& k# _9 c balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the, j+ l& f- u, ~7 r- B: e project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ; Y, ]' p- s4 K* `" @1 `8 g$ Prenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong ) A; ~/ \# k# z0 U' }Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 8 Y# S' a# l' r! G! _8 Speople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be , h- P1 {4 W, L Y0 ytorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished . ~. g% _/ f5 Vmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 2 F8 j% q& ^3 I3 uNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are( L( M- w! g0 R5 ? aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially0 d, C$ U L- w a non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image/ U1 T! X- U/ s, X of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these7 r w" ^ w) i; H/ ]% ~! t Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those a2 z# M6 T, L2 y4 A6 O people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they * X" G/ ]/ _% [4 Gmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some, E- l+ e4 Z! t- c0 M) W of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 3 }! e9 @3 J. m( H4 @"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all ( P# E. m2 c9 x, epeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise; @$ t% ]; M! D: o7 o m9 Z3 D0 R" e apartments are the way to go? No.+ v' _; f* ^ v# J/ {. ]2 y ) z6 z) ^) n/ w ~ " ^9 E+ u& G! E4 ^( ~8 p

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the# ?; x; ~* L4 Y' H* }+ Y" ] situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this " S& f; R) v+ r1 g4 f% Y1 J'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make3 [* e4 e) {& g no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 5 i$ s2 z4 g) X8 [fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant5 T/ ?0 N, L m& R6 m: V+ U: f" X: q Y resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless4 V* t: t; O+ X- H1 k- \ Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is( c4 A& r+ G9 f( j" } unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-9 09:21 , Processed in 0.122809 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部