服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6384|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its: d/ s% S) `9 Y* Z: t1 b& l# H" c architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 1 \) A6 h* v1 m. ~Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"6 u! d, |5 t. s O0 h( m/ _6 {! r city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.3 v2 E$ k. s# E) b8 ~ According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 4 o. F/ p6 m. [, |- A4 y8 A& L3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of9 ?& W9 o; U/ N% P1 O$ b' L Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within2 K9 X' Y. C. x- x# F/ j4 K hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ! J- N. l% L$ L9 B, a& H6 d, `$ A0 oeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera5 y. @$ M* H' |1 z/ R7 G0 G, W and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 3 ^; L3 h6 I% M3 u2 G4 E- Aharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are! U$ y: H7 R9 e! g2 y q( q; ] descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and) j' C# `3 N2 V9 A forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 5 ?/ D- [: x: ewas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 4 m2 h3 O7 p) j5 V# `8 oimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, $ A+ P1 E5 \' r, j' land we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 6 x& Y% A5 P3 ~+ @! Q; \1 Vhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment : f/ u) F5 t% B; ]* d5 Q7 Nof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that , \; ^7 [+ z: L; ino hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are* e$ \; w1 E# T only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a1 p" f/ k! C9 l7 } R sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government x6 [& \: H, J5 j3 h5 Kwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 7 o8 h' ]) A$ Cto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is' H% T3 g. i# o7 A$ ^: G' R "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,1 ]( t Y2 n3 H* w this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are , b# k! G6 X& j" Kstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to R% Q- q+ c1 R5 K z! L"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ) {0 i, w. V$ s9 T: j9 omoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was" ]- g+ p) D p& Z, i a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a . a; s$ g! @2 _! h! L) Kparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across2 s; o5 L6 O7 C the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural3 v8 k) w/ v' W3 P importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for * ~/ V! c7 D: A* ?5 ndevelopment.

Hutongs0 u) w. u" p; k in the old days were residential area where people actually lived & n. _, t3 `( m# Dthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions8 s$ r% d3 B# \5 P: z& h5 @ in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not0 M: T; T- b- }4 G have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you U8 l2 K$ c7 t3 I6 @ y3 B will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.% I1 S: F3 c9 `" R4 }$ x Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 7 c. b. _* s* `/ q* O P+ `" R, `to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used# t+ O# D8 L. `+ d X) I to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses/ f: B9 v6 Q: y$ b2 t6 ? support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically . q1 E1 w! |7 L! T% Punfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to. n$ ]3 Z9 D$ y4 t1 r live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 5 e, Q: |6 a& X7 Q. G: lhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 2 p, ]# C0 o( u! b2 {1 } h% ?balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 7 s# ^, n- `9 yproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be/ x G7 Z# e8 k6 U6 Q7 z& I renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 0 B! l& e; G1 Z8 G" pMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how + E/ N( Y& v/ _3 I4 Speople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be7 ^! X H9 I; q q. T, x( a4 S) A torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished+ z3 S3 v+ L- | memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". : B% F8 \9 g! UNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 9 ^2 [& ], h8 m1 C3 B1 galigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 3 ?8 t2 P$ O8 d$ u# [non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image % b" R* T+ u& _: O4 g; v* d. t& uof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 8 v, }3 l5 `3 X# g4 w% XHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those w# I% H/ q( D; K% ]& u people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they* j: @ M" {; c- r3 s may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some % ^2 Q: {+ x6 f) @' iof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before7 A2 e- B, z2 X& ?. ~ "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 4 L! h9 Q6 m; n& E5 Q7 Jpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise ; c7 C8 ~0 V3 G8 Rapartments are the way to go? No. # i2 n, D: }% t" {. |3 b 1 D7 {$ ]9 T8 z+ W/ h. s" F - t* c, C) u* E. |: h

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the - @+ d7 U" B7 M$ y9 O1 M# `$ csituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this p, J; P) F8 r L8 S7 H) X/ v 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make " ]# ~9 a: K1 N3 z8 W9 kno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so * H* G$ T1 ` c" B' V- |8 k& yfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant $ T4 f+ e# H0 k' h8 w4 z6 Nresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless / h* H A- }2 r3 Q3 T0 r% HBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 4 p8 H& A9 n, `unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-9 12:19 , Processed in 0.126626 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部