UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its# O3 U6 o- X( S0 v$ V9 u
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider* \- e2 R |( T, o. v; J
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
: {9 R: K: Q8 ?6 m6 b% s( ycity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.. F9 o: T9 D6 {* }3 B! i5 b5 \
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
. c, ?1 G) |- N \4 ]3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of1 O) R$ r: z$ w m; s
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within E2 @* ^' H A+ y5 F
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
* t; A1 o" `& B% ~; L/ Qeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
/ {5 o; ^9 ]- Hand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
L7 M% u- ^* X) `! t' g) Uharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
3 \- I, K0 E0 f" ?descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
6 y9 w: N d4 S, T, h0 L1 c" g2 c2 tforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
% L2 S" t6 a% l L5 Dwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
9 c* C8 c0 C$ F, Limpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,2 Z- A* E9 F( Y3 x, A8 M
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong# m/ d( R3 N) F0 |+ _
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment3 J/ R& x: X, R+ K
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
9 \/ {) O }$ E2 }; o5 Uno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
7 A: _, H+ ^& Q1 r! e, ~( eonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
/ @" `) ] R9 y, ~6 Y" osort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
# K. v# l$ A0 a; Mwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
. m/ B1 F' _- M+ Zto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is- H3 J+ U# ], p, A, s" ~5 g
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,) ~; w6 V* v+ U( w( f% L$ F
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are5 Z2 M' T6 [: {% X9 h2 b3 r
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
/ I$ @6 T( b; W: y3 Q$ b"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
% F; Q& C, w* `% q, G2 y+ imoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was* s {1 \& }1 g) }
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a/ b" r. F- x7 f' I+ ^9 K' j
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
+ Q& V* e3 i3 Vthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
9 U$ o! ^, _8 \9 Yimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
& M" U: u) }2 p$ Rdevelopment.
Hutongs
4 Y! i4 J, u7 S/ Z5 M+ l: q% Nin the old days were residential area where people actually lived( ?6 U1 w* \. U7 b& E
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions0 P- r* w2 D" {- P$ c
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not4 n; h2 G- Z2 ?8 _$ p3 g
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you# S' I) E. E0 a2 A
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
: W, F/ J. S6 z* s; a+ w. \/ h/ |Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
- [# x: G- x0 C7 z: x1 H1 gto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
& `2 t; N# u; \; n- s0 n" B! Vto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses/ H1 c G% i' C( k9 j$ W- _! K
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
6 b& ^% l$ _ f: p8 munfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
1 X) N( k4 @( S5 @9 N4 ?& _live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,) g( {6 ~, Y+ _3 c3 J9 }
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
# [ x5 c# m( T3 y2 H8 nbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
3 F8 D. Q7 @: {9 Y( e, t/ Kproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
. i; \6 u" x- J$ r; Frenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
8 B* D9 H% u" D6 lMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
* B% j4 [& _ Y% Z; }6 hpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be+ E- z& O4 Y( J
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
( O3 k y9 Y! Z/ v9 s: Smemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
( P5 {$ \0 [, [* KNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
3 Z1 j" ` ~5 i7 W; f6 k8 o8 Haligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially. d0 N2 S4 I q
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image, Q/ l, a4 ^% O0 X
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
/ N! f' A- k3 A EHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
' S6 Q! }, u8 }( k- c+ Q& Jpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they; i' Y, `. ` A5 J+ R k4 ?' i
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some# \+ s* d7 r# a. i
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before- Z! X* q1 ~5 S. q3 Z
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
( e* P# b2 f8 ~' W' L$ speople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise( b0 B5 }8 j" `0 [! ]2 J& o+ X) i
apartments are the way to go? No.
. T: x8 W# G, ? v7 v7 O Z
* o! n. m: @: @ Q7 |( F: ^ 5 |9 ^+ `6 y& i7 M
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
6 f& [! n4 N. Nsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this- w1 b4 M7 I6 k3 a$ l. T. f- O( Z
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
% G# A K0 E2 i0 yno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
) [0 u% Y2 P9 f$ kfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant5 Z, `2 F% N/ r: a& \2 i
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless5 f, S/ w+ j1 r) f3 @* R
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
2 ]) e: T' o3 V6 Y* h, Nunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|