服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6420|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its : F! n* r% @6 n ]. p+ tarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider( f/ T3 n n" W7 {' @* v Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 7 X, O7 a7 y0 T9 N% `& _# p9 q: ~. w: Vcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.0 H: q) b- }) L8 B/ r9 x( ~ According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 3 p; E$ b! u+ U6 W2 U4 W3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of # Z% G$ q/ \2 m! O1 P- ?# x0 cManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within, r( N9 n1 A! u4 C hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among* C# D- o0 ?* U# Q O4 b each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera5 w: S, w; c% [8 { and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is& F* R, }8 Q4 Z# ?1 ?4 | v harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 3 R$ R" d, l) R S: ]; Ddescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and, K1 j! `, d4 [6 [" ~/ k forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I2 d: Y! h/ E, L0 Z4 I+ {% b0 d v. X was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great : e. ~' Y4 w$ Z! w; s- e2 cimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, % E# K" \0 l1 b$ b, Xand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 4 Y5 v1 A( v# Ihas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment $ ]2 z8 H6 A9 X) k3 Jof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 3 D& L( B" X! f9 ^" Kno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are + c& o/ |/ l Y% R; [6 _5 donly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 2 t0 |" d0 t; t) g2 v4 Jsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government& f1 P* j4 x! @$ E4 z- @4 c want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move' r# ~' X5 k3 o% k to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ) o; _2 q& ^( I5 d' Q2 q"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,4 n( R S0 n" D& D& ?. n! ` this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are & u8 @0 D n& i; h \: Istill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 1 s% J& q T9 }, \"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 5 _0 v9 _5 P u p! z6 [money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was, k/ a( S. V+ h$ d a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a! @2 B; H% g0 n: o! J parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across* W5 [% q/ c+ x* {: s the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 9 l N8 [7 i# h0 T1 B* C( k( Mimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for # p) x/ s6 {- C% D) C5 ?; e7 @development.

Hutongs 2 H' e% [& d) Jin the old days were residential area where people actually lived9 J# K1 z9 \0 z& ]+ j- a4 N there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions# S# ~5 B0 N' C# s+ y3 m in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not % Q) X3 F5 B; D6 o2 b. nhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you& u0 h, t; P# \- ]) n will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 5 _. h# x, c* A4 U6 G5 E4 _5 vFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date/ d% ^/ k3 D; }3 p0 m. }& U to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used , c8 l9 r1 J* J- X Yto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses- |8 \$ H# |$ y' F8 a2 E$ q# D support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically; n2 O! t/ `# }: c/ V unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ; S _3 f/ s0 {* V; \( H+ \- blive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 1 ?1 w9 Y# X" ?) u+ }, W, Zhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the . A* W( X0 m. x; Ubalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the $ b/ l+ e7 p c7 d8 Kproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be& c- e8 @1 `) N4 W3 m renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 5 [- r/ G' l0 v& i2 _3 u) bMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how8 Q( }. u6 K. r B8 d people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 2 n3 n! q* n4 ]torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished - s, O0 b, F0 Z; @: }( kmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".. `& \: [/ t1 i. z; a Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 5 i6 Z- ?* d) K8 }aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 0 R- D1 }% f. N* @8 mnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image3 M" g3 p$ K# s+ c of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these5 }. J4 \$ x$ w) k Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 9 T/ M5 @2 G, Jpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 9 M, C4 m7 x( v+ I. Vmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some4 @. d5 j7 u8 T& F of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before; |% { s6 }# M/ g "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all / b! ^! n& d4 Npeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise & F; c% R$ H zapartments are the way to go? No.' Y2 N' _1 t( A5 B + s* N, w) n {! d " V t! z% _! O* p

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the $ {2 [8 E( _1 A Ksituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this9 X+ l( J2 ~* E, S( K* { 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make& e8 A1 j4 T* p8 B5 J" t no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so1 ^& F8 _+ }: I+ P% _8 a fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ' ]& y. Y" c" o2 R8 F/ Oresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless$ R% Q' n. x% ~4 i' [9 K+ V: | Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 2 W' Z5 d5 H; j( @, yunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-13 08:27 , Processed in 0.123162 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部