服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6476|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its / m0 K9 R9 I3 p" S- |2 W" Barchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider9 z) k$ l" Y' F0 w$ M Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"3 B' d. |2 E$ v: U city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.' j: V& l+ x8 b+ @- ] According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,1 K' h* F7 N0 H$ U 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 5 p. w+ _" @- [" E, l6 J# VManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within $ J7 A i4 Q# `8 c( M! Chutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among+ H7 A$ e4 P4 s* u' ` o3 [ each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera6 G' }' w* }4 |, w G! f3 I" P and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is' T+ j! W1 {# _ harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 9 o- D; d1 N- Cdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and M' P5 ?6 Z! o% h' D1 s forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 1 H2 ^6 R f/ z K7 S. g$ rwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 2 a+ [) x# J/ Y; `4 timpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,. L- I+ k* x. J$ n and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong4 u& x& z8 w. p) s2 I. k has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ' b* Y1 I- B6 ?( Iof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that! E4 v5 w: f% v no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are + D1 D- B$ \- g1 q* J$ L2 nonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a( s5 O# E7 j, b7 X! K sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government: P$ J$ L _0 b9 h9 P$ O6 f want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move5 O' w4 x; B/ J. V0 }: @ to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is # W S4 q) |- U* J4 Y3 l"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ! F. q0 x9 H5 ]7 gthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 5 X5 t8 _; L" }% H( ystill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to: E- r* F, X2 u; u "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make z ?. }7 {2 P5 J( a- Mmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was; p; `* u+ M2 k7 K" v* w- f a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a* o' L# p" u0 N5 K0 z7 B parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across . N7 u9 [7 H! ]% V0 I; m5 t& P: q* Nthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural W; W& }8 m2 X! P9 fimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 1 c; `9 S9 H, w. {9 Kdevelopment.

Hutongs9 L% H' I8 R ?2 b in the old days were residential area where people actually lived2 {2 M+ W$ }) q3 Y: l) V" L there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions ' ]( H& R8 t. R2 o% Bin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not v' q4 J0 r$ Q+ c+ I7 F: H have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you- P4 \% k, K7 o will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. + k5 `4 Q+ s# j. {& sFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date # U9 c0 ~8 z+ e: H4 `to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used . _: X! y+ q5 J! ]6 B ito hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses$ e' B! M1 d" M, `6 O support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically) B' @0 }3 C) g4 B unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to/ e$ ]8 T" o- e3 D% `4 E- ~! a live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 4 ^: w" U2 K4 C* {: r$ Ehutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the* E( x8 m4 V* n5 S$ b balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 8 J0 ]( k" h& Mproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be o3 p! B# A! y; T" Q! _renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong" [5 i- K% E5 F& R% b9 @) u. ^. _ Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how : r- K! F: b6 M& ppeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be9 z: F" e h8 |) k$ W torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished8 _; {; n. L/ ~6 R2 F) M, P! w memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". $ B; Z; u* d! Z8 kNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 2 m$ A o. a3 X. {aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 6 p: W; ]! A8 \- f/ ]6 J1 Knon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image " s: j" b5 {' O% d' y3 C: Aof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these6 Q! ?& j/ `$ R Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 8 h ` V4 x6 d8 B+ O' ^people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they' m+ R* I2 @3 X9 Z% E7 s# v may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 5 M! }# ?* C8 t$ D; Pof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before" t4 t2 Y2 c. P0 K) ]) V) X+ I "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all1 a+ ~4 |. z) Q8 b4 Y; h& K people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise4 ]6 P4 Z/ \5 r/ w0 i* D/ d8 z apartments are the way to go? No. 2 f7 c8 Q$ v* a . _8 G1 T( y7 g8 s% |, @# Z8 k " ]; z" i1 q" q% J; W% u& A( k

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the% h: H) ^$ P4 V& ~4 X' A situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this & J4 p5 U* V9 D# m4 k" T% u, L'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make) W& F% L7 z+ }' g% D" @, H3 [ no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so $ [' J, F$ f% B4 I. s. hfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ! z( P7 {( X2 W5 i% R9 ]6 Iresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless& |1 m- w/ Z8 g) q" k+ e [6 b Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ) W& T S( [6 j1 N$ k: V2 `unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-16 21:04 , Processed in 0.118723 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部