服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6827|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its . B0 L6 C2 v2 A: R/ s, sarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider: [& B( `3 ~; T' p$ x2 V# n" D Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 8 i8 Q9 C# P/ K( Z3 q4 L) d( `9 qcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 4 d6 B0 R! b" z" c/ fAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 3 x' d* T, S8 R- ]" ?' j; {3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of1 k8 l2 [+ L3 b, g) n Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within% b5 O1 K) f$ [8 R hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among+ V6 B. r$ K& C* {& N1 H' N8 ~7 l each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera # y7 Y9 {7 H# O" ~5 Q. ?7 f# D4 mand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is ) I! P& J/ R/ Q1 Oharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are2 K1 |2 q- y: n% I( k descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and2 g9 {! P$ B3 p forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I # i# o3 n# C5 nwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great! u( S& N1 ^3 e2 p% { G G( A impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,* ?& S' e3 Y) K$ m and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong' `) \# l6 {$ }: e) Y9 H' t! \ has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment % Y0 _+ G+ F5 k7 B2 iof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 3 j! h* U, U( P+ ]0 @7 Q, ?no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 7 E( V$ v& E& B6 J) a* n- Honly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a % H, K3 {2 N |$ o: K5 }: csort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government: [+ O: U! b, y0 N3 |0 ] want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 7 f! k; m! B% H! Eto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is) e) {3 T3 r* S# p$ \ "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 5 r5 N, Y3 T% Y6 d2 w. b) Sthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are- ]% w4 P7 ]. B7 ?/ P6 B still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ( V+ q3 _" l( b1 Q& K! `"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make) a9 E0 T/ h5 w* o& [ money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was% V+ N' [5 x6 m9 V- t# V& [6 U8 V a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 9 ]$ Y' ?* d! u7 s( m3 pparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across& B/ h% m- l' m2 L the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 7 z# y; ~' T2 X) i! i% eimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 1 H& E+ J3 C& o$ V! \5 Odevelopment.

Hutongs1 r/ z, W6 w. v in the old days were residential area where people actually lived * P1 e; d% k6 a7 d( g. lthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions ( D- I* S4 C! R5 R, ain hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not3 R3 _$ ^8 d9 _# }6 H' Z have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you6 [" c# A$ w! ] will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.- {3 ~. \0 O2 E! e4 c. P1 N! b Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date5 N& L2 j4 j. n1 [" T to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used ! [: F- A# C, _; R x) L: wto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses2 w4 l& e7 g$ u: n7 p* F- n support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically $ I& Y/ l+ L1 C' M9 punfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 8 `3 O. { G- }, V9 ulive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 9 r! f# g: e. L s: Zhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the `. N* r/ V O. L: k/ ~3 {balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the( E: a( w. ?0 }+ n1 o- z w3 q: Q$ o project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be # r$ Z! A0 D: ~6 f" c& xrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong1 P3 f5 `3 `8 x7 i' f Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how# e2 d) l2 s4 R" ^ people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be # R- n# ^- w: t! _% c; Qtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 3 k8 |- p: a5 N" f; o" f$ mmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 5 r0 @( V% {0 D; bNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are) U7 m+ H: E* f: U) d3 l aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially3 m3 x, v5 e3 j* o non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image $ u6 r( w0 U, G) P R, Iof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these( _& y$ n. h2 ^1 k Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those $ |/ U7 j `' Q- l! B/ Zpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they; m! \0 g9 l. v+ @+ C O may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some$ K+ u" o _" m( f of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before8 `- g5 w2 C4 A' k# A$ C- B7 ^/ |1 x "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all8 c, ~0 _( Q4 X5 e9 P0 V people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise ; ]2 Q; t, I* S0 ~* y" hapartments are the way to go? No. 9 J7 h7 P! a" @. f+ z . U& W& N) z: e 9 J6 V: _3 U2 i4 i% c

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 4 `; t2 I! u2 c8 }- b9 msituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this& a+ b' f) B' K& W) @# I6 G 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 2 d2 Y, ?& R1 zno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so % j1 y2 S3 O1 O! Pfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 1 I3 `# G6 d. |1 O* tresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless : b# ?3 F/ F- @$ gBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ' V4 j3 L9 L; F' A- wunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-24 15:48 , Processed in 0.126624 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部