服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6836|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ) q, y5 o. C3 E. g2 A1 {6 marchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider7 d9 \5 M1 y4 d Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian", s7 z& c% \* v3 a city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.8 W( e% E3 V" I According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 0 O* B5 B. Y) r2 \3 @- Z3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 1 R. W" p; b+ [+ C+ {; w( s) dManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within @( y, ^7 J5 m! C% S {7 X0 R* q2 u hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among% i. c, {* ]* l each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera & `/ Z/ A: B, N7 N! ^$ fand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is # `) d0 x8 X4 K0 }' t& kharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are% N/ t# y- |$ p P0 I7 b: E descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and! G9 m/ ?# u( S# {+ a2 `- n% E( l forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I , s: L6 h3 ]5 t) K2 g/ Rwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 2 e5 z0 u- X; l: i, Y4 Fimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,9 N- J B1 S) q' t and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 9 n" A7 [$ o- z: ]1 t$ zhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment! x. F1 i! M2 |; f8 m5 J of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that. P4 ~2 C; g3 U5 e* \/ N6 M8 q no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 3 o. K$ l6 V D# Z% c1 \ gonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a. G9 h3 @( w. r! m9 i8 X8 R1 i sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government , E$ y5 Z) P' A( Zwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move5 C+ z% P( R* Q to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is7 y. ^0 w1 y2 g0 j$ s% I. I "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,( H- s7 P4 a; T) O. j this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are . D$ k( S3 Q7 o4 X- x. R8 mstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ) ~7 U, X- U( ["progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 0 ^. [+ W* ~5 C, Gmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was # n3 z: S0 p! d7 }9 va beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a' X9 f( ], r6 R9 ^ parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across % m4 d( {, H0 t7 c' fthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural. U' s, q9 S" j" `1 u9 \ importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for& F' W( y3 y8 f0 {. c development.

Hutongs 4 Z# X1 H1 Y4 f# Z; m+ @7 ein the old days were residential area where people actually lived ( l$ g0 _: I4 Z8 Z1 ~9 O0 {2 Qthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions& C4 ?. b8 j) R, L/ ~ in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not7 G' ^0 t$ E9 b7 V have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you1 a' L3 y& e3 K9 H/ Z will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.- x) S: a# l$ b ]* Y Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date" Y; [! e; g+ u1 T- ? to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used ) r2 O z6 j3 | ^% ] f1 @; @to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses1 I" e* w! X) q& Y6 e6 j support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 4 E: R' x: p. N5 N( F" g$ w+ c4 dunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to . U5 Q6 R: G1 [, clive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,$ Q2 R* v! ?( p! P- u( R0 K& l, A hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the K& ]4 r7 j4 ^! n7 j balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the$ ~- }" o$ f R/ z' t/ _ project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be. E# k# G# ]; Z B/ J- q renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong : j1 b+ k) l1 |5 LMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how + H7 G, M# z% h d7 Bpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 0 I+ m1 ?6 c) a. }torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished @9 N3 q4 t3 F! h. nmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". ) V, U0 b; H5 m! E1 iNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are & a9 j1 e/ |7 b, Saligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially' z3 r4 F7 v$ _( O. O; | non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image* O# f1 V3 Z. F* i8 L7 t of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these) o* ?" W' V- n. _% b Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 6 Z9 S H; H" qpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they+ C* l; e7 c, I may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some : E) ~3 I! r% Eof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before E$ B5 G; i0 }$ T- r( l"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all; u# j1 C0 Z' w% @: r# f7 X' X0 G people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise2 }- F' j/ }+ C2 s! ^% V apartments are the way to go? No.: d, _* L2 `0 q! u) O6 H2 u ! k- p* j: i. r9 r+ f/ q 9 |, k2 `% l6 M1 U! \

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the ' X3 a, r/ T$ |0 v+ Ksituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 6 K- G& V+ _6 }( l$ o7 d* J'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make . J' U9 |. _9 d$ Sno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ' \9 @% G9 Z2 j: t: n8 \: ~+ g. W" Vfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant, m% j: M) S! q8 }' e resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless / d- J' [" O& j4 Y2 ~. o* x) oBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is% `& S, |9 U d( E7 d1 } unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-25 10:48 , Processed in 0.115712 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部