UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
+ [9 o4 I: Z* {# v1 O0 Oarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider' E9 c% B" h ~5 w- r
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
7 E* B; b( }; X# a, L* ^: P2 ecity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.' _, w& l3 _2 l: g9 k7 j1 k: b( f* i
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
- M- W' h# w& [3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
& N; u5 d" k. d9 vManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within) F6 M6 C( P( Y( ?+ m }
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among5 H$ @1 X1 e. v7 b
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
0 Q8 L) a* T3 Pand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
! a- i+ z/ i- Oharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are) R5 I+ E3 j7 Y1 M3 D- X: u
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
0 x) h6 G% S/ _forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I' L. Y9 m) n5 p G8 \) |
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great+ E: A3 y* _( K9 w
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,4 W y, O& H6 i0 ~5 h# O7 \
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
' m2 L. }( j5 J qhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
6 I' \' K8 Q+ J' i4 u& }of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
$ j4 V' Y5 q$ @no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
( ?# x ~) {0 z1 E* Z4 N/ [, T k8 @only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a" R4 N; w; A6 W4 e. O
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government# l& z$ M+ i T" q- f5 i
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
% s# H* T3 J8 B0 V* ~8 Tto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is3 P0 s6 |7 c# ~5 Z% T1 T8 n
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,+ s6 v, ]" q- I: Z
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
, r! ^/ L0 o! q( N, pstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to" m, Z/ g5 o0 k7 C) p7 p7 m
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make% s0 b$ B* N" x3 ?! @" L0 R" W! Z
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
4 q2 u$ R! f$ K" ha beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
- o" ?3 o1 l% oparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
* ^& k( B- t3 d# U# N" d. mthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural% X" T1 }- f3 G; V9 @- p
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for+ K0 n( r$ u; u
development.
Hutongs
' s: p* Y+ |0 s9 C" Rin the old days were residential area where people actually lived) {# e% U( K3 f6 z7 l. i
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions' P& b2 l1 Q8 _" C7 z
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not0 K( G" ^+ Y9 P! d2 g
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you( Z9 L6 Z! N* J- I
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.: K6 @0 P+ }" k
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
; a% R0 F2 b% v! nto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
0 Z1 |* [' E/ _0 T E2 U- [to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses1 ?, {7 ~' Y a Z# l) i
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically, Q7 r3 T% t0 n0 R8 _9 T6 A
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to# B5 h8 M0 e( w0 @! P
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
& `5 O5 `' W/ ^- Q/ thutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the2 r5 O# _- l0 \ ^) X& u
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the/ `6 w q! z' z: f
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be- m: V6 C# l4 \4 U) D9 Z8 Q) n* c
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong6 N! w. k- N% ?/ G# z5 O
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
j/ M) [1 Z3 ?! [3 E1 wpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
" h/ c# p: z! \, u( \( o; itorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished; M/ N- P8 H% u: A+ K) ]
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
* Z8 M! }" y' K5 `: l$ L) _& RNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are4 S4 V) b# b8 m: @; I
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially9 ], S! }2 X3 Z
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image, G6 v: ^6 Y$ \% ?7 K) S
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
4 ~. E3 \1 d! |/ A: |. |7 iHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
4 c% m C5 }- K- _$ i3 L9 `8 ?people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they( R7 P7 {, J0 c& x
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some. i# ^3 v' [7 E
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
+ U1 D6 N- R9 u( H1 H) E"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all0 O/ R: L9 G8 P/ {) B
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise1 z8 T. f) A2 S& V! i0 V
apartments are the way to go? No.7 G" E! v: F# K f) [. a
A+ A0 N* b# H
, v* |; L7 V* J- d1 c; e
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
# E/ M. {, ? V$ X, }6 R7 W% bsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
( I/ i# _* G7 i; |'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
& M; k- Z- V7 L eno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
9 @% Q/ n; W* T/ k, Hfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
9 k, U$ Q; O1 s0 ^9 [6 {3 Zresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless7 G# h2 f' I# ^5 T& Y* `4 O' ~5 Z4 Z
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is1 D ?; @9 M" @, H
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|