UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
) q, y5 o. C3 E. g2 A1 {6 marchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider7 d9 \5 M1 y4 d
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian", s7 z& c% \* v3 a
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.8 W( e% E3 V" I
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
0 O* B5 B. Y) r2 \3 @- Z3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
1 R. W" p; b+ [+ C+ {; w( s) dManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within @( y, ^7 J5 m! C% S {7 X0 R* q2 u
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among% i. c, {* ]* l
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
& `/ Z/ A: B, N7 N! ^$ fand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
# `) d0 x8 X4 K0 }' t& kharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are% N/ t# y- |$ p P0 I7 b: E
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and! G9 m/ ?# u( S# {+ a2 `- n% E( l
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
, s: L6 h3 ]5 t) K2 g/ Rwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
2 e5 z0 u- X; l: i, Y4 Fimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,9 N- J B1 S) q' t
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
9 n" A7 [$ o- z: ]1 t$ zhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment! x. F1 i! M2 |; f8 m5 J
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that. P4 ~2 C; g3 U5 e* \/ N6 M8 q
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
3 o. K$ l6 V D# Z% c1 \ gonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a. G9 h3 @( w. r! m9 i8 X8 R1 i
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
, E$ y5 Z) P' A( Zwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move5 C+ z% P( R* Q
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is7 y. ^0 w1 y2 g0 j$ s% I. I
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,( H- s7 P4 a; T) O. j
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
. D$ k( S3 Q7 o4 X- x. R8 mstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
) ~7 U, X- U( ["progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
0 ^. [+ W* ~5 C, Gmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
# n3 z: S0 p! d7 }9 va beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a' X9 f( ], r6 R9 ^
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
% m4 d( {, H0 t7 c' fthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural. U' s, q9 S" j" `1 u9 \
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for& F' W( y3 y8 f0 {. c
development.
Hutongs
4 Z# X1 H1 Y4 f# Z; m+ @7 ein the old days were residential area where people actually lived
( l$ g0 _: I4 Z8 Z1 ~9 O0 {2 Qthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions& C4 ?. b8 j) R, L/ ~
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not7 G' ^0 t$ E9 b7 V
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you1 a' L3 y& e3 K9 H/ Z
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.- x) S: a# l$ b ]* Y
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date" Y; [! e; g+ u1 T- ?
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
) r2 O z6 j3 | ^% ] f1 @; @to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses1 I" e* w! X) q& Y6 e6 j
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
4 E: R' x: p. N5 N( F" g$ w+ c4 dunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
. U5 Q6 R: G1 [, clive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,$ Q2 R* v! ?( p! P- u( R0 K& l, A
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the K& ]4 r7 j4 ^! n7 j
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the$ ~- }" o$ f R/ z' t/ _
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be. E# k# G# ]; Z B/ J- q
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
: j1 b+ k) l1 |5 LMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
+ H7 G, M# z% h d7 Bpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
0 I+ m1 ?6 c) a. }torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
@9 N3 q4 t3 F! h. nmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
) V, U0 b; H5 m! E1 iNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
& a9 j1 e/ |7 b, Saligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially' z3 r4 F7 v$ _( O. O; |
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image* O# f1 V3 Z. F* i8 L7 t
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these) o* ?" W' V- n. _% b
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
6 Z9 S H; H" qpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they+ C* l; e7 c, I
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
: E) ~3 I! r% Eof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
E$ B5 G; i0 }$ T- r( l"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all; u# j1 C0 Z' w% @: r# f7 X' X0 G
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise2 }- F' j/ }+ C2 s! ^% V
apartments are the way to go? No.: d, _* L2 `0 q! u) O6 H2 u
! k- p* j: i. r9 r+ f/ q 9 |, k2 `% l6 M1 U! \
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
' X3 a, r/ T$ |0 v+ Ksituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
6 K- G& V+ _6 }( l$ o7 d* J'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
. J' U9 |. _9 d$ Sno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
' \9 @% G9 Z2 j: t: n8 \: ~+ g. W" Vfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant, m% j: M) S! q8 }' e
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
/ d- J' [" O& j4 Y2 ~. o* x) oBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is% `& S, |9 U d( E7 d1 }
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|