|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 6172|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its - @8 a7 `' G2 V* w- d' Z3 }architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 3 M* h9 E( f# O, G6 H* ]Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" + H& k6 U. G0 F! j% Ecity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.$ `! }. {6 R7 U* @% q/ q; X According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, & v' e" n" M! Q1 p2 {3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ( C( u; k" G% ~$ N' r6 EManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within. W5 f ]* ^) g4 A2 N hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among) G8 P$ g1 ~ t4 |3 C* { each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera; V9 i+ n6 |4 W9 v% c5 C# x P and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is( } z+ B7 {* H3 v( _& e harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are! U* \8 R; ~ f; H0 @ descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 0 `, T& n/ ~' w* t( Bforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I$ Z1 G, ~% L0 W1 h# | was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great ' `9 {9 J. l* O4 s+ |; Y) T. v4 |impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 7 ^* H. [" A' T7 U Zand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong " w& `: ~; w5 S3 l0 Uhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment% ?+ T, N" @7 g8 y4 x1 M6 d of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that ' A" V) X5 W' P$ f/ t, z3 fno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are; q4 {) f' T# F" a& F only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 7 U$ z' w; }5 X) o9 Zsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government! C5 V3 O! g; h, b% k( k want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move2 O4 X" J7 k% l5 K' k to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is + t& a4 v/ I6 W! U, i0 P5 ] A4 N"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,' ^- K1 c3 o" I, F0 R$ D this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are) y; p1 ~) }; t& L( Y& P% J still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to( K6 U1 P3 w; W" x, d, `# P/ F* \) T "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make; P8 o; J8 C/ Y2 Q! Y money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was D$ f9 E' Y# Y( ]0 |4 Ha beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 4 J: G6 H& ]4 f3 O$ F4 v( sparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across. m+ _8 P" Q' {- {$ C, ~$ W. p the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural / x; x1 ?5 j0 |, |1 V' C% jimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for9 J% G {# u& {+ b4 o' y9 c development.

Hutongs- R1 W/ X/ g5 M in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 1 e8 \) l4 H; e2 kthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions: _) g l, Y }) f in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not , g' s' P# O n9 [2 uhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you& P" h" ~7 U# u# b! p. q will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. " ?% r& L$ K% X9 H, a6 n0 T: G( @! aFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date , E( `, G$ t5 |8 x2 E9 o, Ito support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used / W4 r3 ^4 m7 u' mto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ( ^! A. x; _ d9 ~" Jsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically* R. s }. l* @/ } unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to/ h" J/ L; Y: T! m8 O% [! d- j' L live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 0 l( y1 y( a" {; Yhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 7 S$ ]4 t: I/ C* Q1 m3 D [) S4 Ubalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 4 R1 G: V; C8 p ^project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ( L9 }* P' A ]0 p, Qrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong / S0 X2 K( O. N0 }& jMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how5 b% J% F$ S- H# C* c people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be/ ]- ^- ]6 p" b7 r& t$ I, g torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 6 P" r8 z2 g* `& Bmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".+ Y2 L3 y3 ~( N) P2 m& ], q Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are& E# q. e/ E, `- I# n aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially % z; z4 D) |1 C- v# ~. M ~non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image" c- l4 J, ]+ L, I2 ~ of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 0 Z& ^4 j {0 e& [Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those) f) x# A" Q7 H/ v& g7 R8 I6 _- B people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they: X2 } V( ]8 H may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some & A$ `6 n# M: f( w Z# F3 tof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before6 m: l- c$ P6 |( k, ^ "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all g- G1 f* d# B4 p4 Ypeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 8 n8 S* ~- o7 ?& _* T$ w- w# capartments are the way to go? No.9 L v& @. \# q. z" l ( o' c* Q$ o( R2 K o# Q1 s2 R) B

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the2 p. v3 y8 i$ S# [4 r3 ] situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this . U0 G( O' q% k1 j- q'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make) q5 w8 m' w3 U. e. A. H; C4 M) h no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so : t, I2 k4 d- {% yfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant4 b3 M" F: Q( G7 F; k8 ? resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless5 L. n/ ]5 p s3 s7 E- [ Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is % N* s. k# r( x$ h, v4 ounlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-10-26 20:06 , Processed in 1.188210 second(s), 7 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部