服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6767|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ; _ [4 w" k4 e& Y/ @: ^& m: i' parchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider3 [6 p* T% O, e% A( }$ j Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" u! F& z9 ^- y+ t5 Tcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ' k6 m0 S8 v: P( N7 `$ V+ uAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, T- ]: B3 x [2 u3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of % U% V+ B; |1 y+ d( K% TManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within7 V4 | u5 g$ r# p( u- s! F hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among v+ e- `$ U9 D/ W P6 V, @ each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera ) m* X% u" M+ C# Jand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 4 ?' F e2 W5 N1 D W* s- Q% gharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are; k7 ~5 m/ E7 K descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and / R* O9 f7 A% \7 `; I" @forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ' h' b b! ?3 y3 i; b/ Ewas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great* b$ J( P9 k2 L; J, Q2 \ impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 0 I) ^4 ?+ P8 t y" [/ sand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong % ^2 l- t7 {: G& I1 t" uhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment7 R( w! u$ \4 e of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that # J2 T2 u- W- `- W3 [& z8 Ono hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are - s/ K4 }" E; {3 x' yonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a / j8 ~# A7 h; Z; \6 |; dsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government* m5 _# a& d4 m) ~8 g" d want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 7 f! B( D# E' P! r8 D. W- Kto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is % C% J: d% A2 E* D"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 6 k+ N% K$ C; E0 N/ S5 J$ c+ e/ m2 lthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are, Z% i. h, \2 Y6 J0 y, k still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to7 m( J- k( Y2 N "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make e" j5 r. J0 F money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was + Y( `1 f/ Z9 x4 Da beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a + v9 l( c( b6 ]9 oparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 9 G0 E2 o. C- }8 Othe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ( y, h" C. p: `) Pimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for% Z, w9 ?8 m$ }. P) q development.

Hutongs2 u4 D6 F( t+ q in the old days were residential area where people actually lived $ T0 {. i* ?- a" |7 Wthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions+ ]* x$ z. N, Q3 H4 W in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not1 B- O6 a3 I+ o7 T have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ! O$ Z& W1 s; g1 x1 N1 N% lwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 1 l4 w4 b1 ^5 K& ~4 f$ ]Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date - [. h& I8 I6 c' B4 z" j0 J( X8 Bto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used ; [( x8 |/ ` d8 Bto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ) @1 ~4 N7 D% M- T; asupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically4 H' e1 Z) G! P8 C# G' W$ i4 Y unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to( V( K1 M% K$ I; ^: P! m3 {% ? live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,3 E. M/ p, b0 _5 c: G hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the # X; i4 x! |/ b4 I I/ g* m5 z' M% cbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the' K3 S1 c% ?- V' e project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be$ ^ @7 V/ X8 T/ f renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong # O0 ]/ C6 v5 _/ t0 _5 q2 a* rMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how9 m1 A: U3 X v* X% R# s% Q0 F9 T people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be / C+ g1 M/ `; Z( Itorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished! s: t B# O% ]$ k) Z% @! D) \ memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".+ }9 L' d3 X/ V Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ( t$ F/ t& b, ]0 u! galigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 8 d; z' d9 f3 O0 m7 Snon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image. [6 v" M: |( H$ U4 g' A% | of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these b' Q1 ` f3 OHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those8 {7 e8 C+ P9 p/ Y people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they. _* k! c) z' f may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 5 V4 |& s- j5 W+ K- xof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 9 N7 q7 D+ T0 ]: m( l% j"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all2 ~) O0 N* C* [) c people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise - t" f/ X' D/ E: H2 H( z: @4 W+ wapartments are the way to go? No. . R( L* z; d9 }- M W $ \- X) |; V. \! r) }8 }$ O0 s e! R/ e/ M& ^" V* \! f/ K" e( p' d

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the C0 b6 l+ w9 v* J situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this0 G% c" ]+ N x3 j1 d 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make ) z, C5 u& Q" G: w6 {. {& D' |no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so * j: y+ \$ M3 b0 S5 A$ Ofast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 7 y! X# E" q# ^5 O( A6 z7 w$ z* Vresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless , a' s/ o( O/ f. ]0 z# O$ a6 NBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is - J# |3 t5 W3 r% B+ @, ]unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-18 04:06 , Processed in 0.123636 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部