服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6305|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its3 h; |+ ^$ N# b) T$ z architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider0 q7 p9 \0 _ O; Q" o. l Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"! ^( A" u7 h: w6 L, `- g2 [ city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. . x6 a& c1 d: u zAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ! h) K7 l, S* b( L; c3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 7 A0 c4 r E% E% @9 y% V) MManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within: i! \$ N$ ^" k7 A, r( l( D hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 5 \$ r( z4 G1 L0 S v+ }- K% Keach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera1 u# e* [5 A6 `0 K8 {( [ and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is ! n, p+ X/ W" i5 g& D$ d3 sharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are2 M4 o3 q# ~& [- u- f descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and + `0 E% O( u9 e" }/ Z) kforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ! @. v% [) @4 ~7 @was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great * z' V( k$ j0 l1 j% ^, h# ?impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 4 U: e# d2 { A, g/ E- O% C+ \4 Zand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong2 Y8 t3 \. X3 w# e# q* w N/ ? has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment * @8 K/ J' w) v1 Lof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that3 Q9 A' N4 J0 _, k& d) E. ^. u no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are . G( w8 [6 `& j5 g3 Honly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a + C; d4 L# O8 Y% ^: Fsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 2 Y2 ^2 z c0 d5 ]& B. twant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move, ~! J+ D- A* L% q4 I* I* p) o to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is : G/ E7 s1 a5 y# {9 j"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,/ A1 P0 U6 w! C& c) m$ C this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are" t. o ~6 {' J& u still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to# F/ C# j9 k) G0 W% `" _ "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ; f) l5 i& u2 y* u7 Ymoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was4 _# L$ Z5 A/ |- F a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a5 t% M; D& a. ]" Z6 l3 G parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across $ H9 y2 y% q8 U5 g ~the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural; c6 d# k9 ~) z$ E2 h* v importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 1 A: Y8 i3 S! X* N7 p% Udevelopment.

Hutongs 4 |6 Y+ f! W+ Y; S! fin the old days were residential area where people actually lived # d& d- @3 l/ {7 ^6 n% L2 n+ athere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions1 B p3 I4 A$ p+ M* J. J6 c& J C in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not $ U+ S) Y. K& P- Shave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you# I- y' b* \& x1 I1 J0 P will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. % R4 D8 ?6 P) o8 D7 hFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date7 A: p" l2 Z; L( N9 i6 e to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used* f- m% F7 Y" u to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses , Y9 i5 U% X3 s& |- Y6 Gsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically : E6 {* r+ ` U. I+ wunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ) S) K M7 K% F1 ilive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,9 q+ G! K" X- Y% L5 r8 f$ Z9 z hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the % t* t: z& ?- t' l' nbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the " s6 ?$ U! t2 U+ I _' \project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 4 e- g! R6 s0 P6 ~" j1 c2 erenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong5 O4 I( p# `3 n/ N Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how# S! G' K; S( P& \7 a/ g* @5 ^ people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be + [3 m* r$ f L: _3 t4 Ctorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished - Q# `, K% O6 Y& }# U) S" \5 _memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 1 i+ l( `! d, R" p7 }/ P6 H$ |Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 0 d$ |8 Z- Q0 }# F) P1 p# caligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially4 s( b- D4 S5 F/ u* b non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image. ^4 X8 i# O; e7 K0 o of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these7 G+ L- b2 j% Y; t+ N6 ^+ ?8 m( i Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those , c! _. T: q2 ` Y2 V9 A" p- E* dpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they , x/ J1 V+ _1 E: E( e' g; E lmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ; ] j" X! s8 [4 C kof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 1 M- n/ @9 N3 q3 M"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 5 R; `/ C/ N9 a: [1 x" `people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise- s8 J" d; w# ?9 @& z( P# ` apartments are the way to go? No.% @' @8 h& ?, q- ~2 p& l5 O : j" @1 E3 n- L$ V% t4 Z! _8 g . U5 o" A9 p3 g$ m& F2 T9 N6 d

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the4 s. O* [1 O3 V4 K2 p0 l& N8 m, k$ O situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 4 C% y5 Z9 r6 q* Q- o'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make( s# X0 h- y9 i7 U no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so % V! v- s$ D5 B7 ]+ A. Ufast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant+ s$ } H( K) f% O6 e# T/ R5 e resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless+ W5 @( t; f9 Z" } Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is, G& w) `; d( F" u+ o1 w unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-20 09:34 , Processed in 0.139286 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部