服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6552|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its0 H; o0 T0 { x4 l, O architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider, u$ {2 K* w- @, C Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 2 s5 Z. o) q' t8 C9 j% b! ncity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ! G' w$ A Z0 U( c( v/ XAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,; r" p( v- B7 B5 p/ `, M! |& m 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of* c5 Y+ b3 N0 @; c Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 3 }/ @+ ]" {3 H. bhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among : w0 X3 O% a- l; Yeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera + g+ k0 [- I, l4 g6 gand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is+ ?7 \3 |5 u8 B- q+ d harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are3 R4 i2 C$ d% ? r descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and ! ]2 U8 H7 ^% y Aforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 4 v; w* y+ T1 ^ ^was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great . T( f& `: }3 {% u, bimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, & H7 X+ [! w8 d) p" p$ K0 Oand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong. m3 G' K. R* ]; M has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment # d+ Q- B- K8 @) Vof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that& p1 M; Y4 C5 n3 c, Q+ a; q no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 1 M, A) w n% F3 q+ [( f: ponly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a # `9 A/ _! W% g Z; \$ v8 gsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government, [$ C0 }2 g1 H want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move# N1 G! Q# y+ s+ C+ i to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ( v8 b4 R6 }/ v5 M' O" i"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, # Q+ W( D8 v7 C; a$ x, s! Tthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are + G: I% U, R, h& F- J6 S4 Rstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to& H4 j/ P% {5 v$ k. T# a "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make4 |$ u# G& t! I, ~ money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was ( a( I/ I( n. s$ ]* Qa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a ( F& M c% P. [1 Nparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 3 w' k/ o I% A- T A" K) s' bthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural7 W) S t: V7 O) A' a1 W" B- C importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 3 Z2 K" a/ Z& S1 u8 Xdevelopment.

Hutongs1 O) D0 @1 t% }0 N in the old days were residential area where people actually lived' h9 d d& v' Z- H: V6 F, G6 L there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 4 z9 A! u3 f# l) [3 ^5 Win hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not & D7 b3 \* x6 p9 C* D5 }& fhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you0 e; T% c: Q- P0 u! |2 _! p will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.5 B/ V; R% z9 H" v; k# G Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date; G) w# W5 }9 N: ?4 ?. S) I ~, }3 P% | to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used: Q4 ^9 J) y( D# l2 J, H- J to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses( u3 i& V: N, p support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically ' N: U& A6 @! d9 s" {& |! ]7 Yunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to( I* A ]0 l' @& j, v9 ^2 o" { live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose," N: _0 }7 e+ V2 u hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the ) X! g3 j# m1 Ubalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the % X& i4 r+ `% ?# V: y7 G) v$ lproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be $ h T: H5 `, Zrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong% l9 h3 g3 g! X) B3 `* ]: S' M# [ Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how8 D$ H9 X: D& J0 J# {5 Z people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be , n- T8 Q0 Y" i5 O l Otorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished* ^& d" W$ w0 R6 Q0 z memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".; `$ P( n+ G; i+ Z: l Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are3 b' B& e5 o. t6 p, D aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially; r& g2 q) l& h+ p4 W! ` non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image / N8 \4 E5 W. @of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these + n% q' A4 z1 d: r. I) A3 `6 _Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 1 L1 ~/ M( ]3 I2 F5 E1 qpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they . a1 c' U' p( G: ~may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 4 Z' n3 s: W0 m( G- {+ Jof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 1 @" u+ J- m/ e' Y( u' J5 N"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all" ?0 r, Q& C/ w0 Z" _ people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 0 w3 d! h, d; tapartments are the way to go? No. : U) q; p# [& \3 F5 K 2 m! _ d; W. V6 ]8 y& x , ~8 @% J# y; @/ V0 E) \$ b

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the0 e3 x5 A: i3 [" O' x# G* p situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this " O# h2 H! _" A+ z6 m! F9 z0 y5 u'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make u' `$ b0 x& Gno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ! V: n% ]5 k& e1 G- ffast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 8 P% v7 a5 e/ N; l$ dresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless. D* g0 K0 a6 K6 O5 G9 X& [ Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ) L; x0 E ?" e9 v. G4 J& hunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-24 11:51 , Processed in 0.497182 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部