服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6790|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its % C$ v+ |; U7 P. V+ Uarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider' C- _) j" O: x Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 7 C6 O$ J: @& H# \9 ocity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.6 E, ?( U7 ]7 @" U3 B According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, : P! c6 j; m$ I/ D+ d5 n3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of6 @ `3 B& N5 g6 k2 B { Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within " O# O4 n+ w, a0 n+ Hhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among * j H5 i* d6 ~each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 8 c/ k( b8 c- |6 Iand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is * Z) {/ e1 o( l* k; \' W$ \. Vharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are' H6 b% S: x- d- ?2 s/ d/ w descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and0 q) x% F( s, {+ y+ I. _5 j forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 3 |. s- }* ?0 m, P4 h: f m2 F, o1 ewas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great4 {8 b0 C; b( z# j impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,/ o3 F @1 Z) c# ^6 U and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong . @/ _/ ^# R- D0 z6 U6 shas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment " [+ g5 P" s* |: d; W( ]of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that0 [. v8 Z5 M/ x. U* a! ? no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ; N5 B2 W" o5 U# t2 K8 F3 Fonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a G# l& L7 F) E" t% f3 I$ L8 i7 usort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government* o! {& N2 Y& Y want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move M$ R* L4 V V* `7 i3 Q* a9 j0 ~ to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is5 J( x) V) G1 D# z& I. u "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,- H: w- ]' G8 G. P this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are1 c5 @4 ]2 _; E' e+ j' M$ p; } still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to4 o1 C" s. A* Q& M. } "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make * t5 M& z: v. lmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was, D% U' G* S! k4 ]1 e5 \ a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 8 ~- O. n# h# `$ R/ Q! bparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 2 u9 h+ F# }2 F6 I) z6 Fthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural2 B& Y) x( b. _ importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for , H$ R: X8 \/ w# x6 Gdevelopment.

Hutongs- N# d3 X" x7 C in the old days were residential area where people actually lived7 M! ]0 L9 N/ c9 e( N* p there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions. U' }0 n: Z3 p0 d/ | in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 2 C- F5 s/ A4 ]9 k) v* A4 R/ uhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you% A& V' R+ G9 a' o q2 Q# A will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 1 h* N C- M% h2 fFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 8 O6 q; ^" d7 Xto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 9 f* o {* L( z9 P, }9 z* m) F& nto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ; ]) Z. C4 Y+ Y" y' m) d3 N1 osupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically: k9 y% h" V7 x$ N unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to' E; |) n0 i4 d2 [ live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,8 ]7 k4 J# D8 Q% J; }2 s/ N hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the+ M/ j! y/ Z0 P. _7 ]' [ balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the; E! S! ?, a4 ~3 U4 D& A project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be W Y7 _6 d0 y _) |; { renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong / E8 {! N9 H( X; N5 h, Z9 }5 [Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how " H4 x' h# B1 {% D% A5 l9 ^people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be. o" \! w- A9 V1 e torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished * C; [5 ^ A5 _4 c7 hmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". $ }# O3 t5 ?/ f) v& d5 V9 `Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are4 R) t+ i' \( ?7 |; K" Z3 ~( k aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially $ g) Z9 k* S% G& `( D* Gnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image : q- k/ d4 @- Fof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these $ J; g9 `, U; K* {: sHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 9 y& \5 R7 ]$ C5 T" G: Fpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 0 N& ~& r! s1 ~! M( W2 m5 Y* `$ ymay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some$ d0 r0 x2 ]# u6 r8 E7 f of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before % o' g+ r, {; Y6 S5 H. P"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all % C+ k6 V3 ~2 Y* @1 G6 m8 vpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise $ Z- Z- K+ K b' H) Dapartments are the way to go? No.8 c# O5 D/ g3 X9 y! O7 G3 C5 I 4 e G& K5 z$ `9 l) L ) Z- w2 }( t3 o; t" O* r

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the1 k: ^+ y) V; }8 }. s8 k situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 2 n# n- j- q# q9 G, j/ h) N'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 7 n$ x& ~' C) C, X5 N# Rno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so. |9 i0 F, m- B. ?- d8 c- x1 I* m6 X fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant/ C0 b9 J f* [1 v5 Z" d0 Q1 B resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless3 U7 C- a! `, a6 w% i Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is" e0 n1 z$ y: f unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-21 04:04 , Processed in 1.424750 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部