服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6343|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its6 y* m8 X4 e3 L& `: K0 `0 p architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider8 F2 w3 U# ^. y9 T5 c: E Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" & Q3 K5 E& u `2 jcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.+ M* b$ v# w7 U. w+ V3 a According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,6 w; v8 q% V) }0 W( F+ x 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of: @ J, G' ? ~, ?0 p' M Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within7 _6 ^: Q- S/ V( s' g- e hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 8 ?. U/ d9 P- ?+ ^% _each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera ! }) A- N: K2 e; V7 oand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is , s* D& S; [ ?, g2 Yharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are. X2 {6 D% ?; {. [ descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and: M1 ]# u/ X2 E- X* d; [( \ forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I , o5 B5 F9 r% `3 F$ T: Bwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 2 X% L# D5 k0 d0 y& \8 S* Y. Y t& timpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ; d) J) |0 S) K9 k' w) qand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong' @8 |6 ]# e% A. ]" k" J3 a has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment # [ X* S" F, x; D" n# S4 u. eof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that7 e, ^* U# n$ ~+ I: u no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are* I6 A: ~( s6 ]/ C. I only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a : }+ D1 c$ N' L& v5 H3 Ysort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government( |: ]- D. V2 ` want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move. B% S8 C' s- a7 D( R/ E) Z' l to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is * c6 }/ [" F0 E7 c9 A! W"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,1 \# o. |2 ]! H( p this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are9 |# [: x, y1 k8 h still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 0 F- l5 @: F1 l5 U v! ^"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make & H* O, Q8 n. k/ Pmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was2 W% F: W' l" L$ w) o- t* m# B a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a* J/ K9 X; j3 S# | parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across y* ]/ i$ h1 }* f2 }; uthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural , v) z: d: l% {$ Simportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 2 b; D4 r; s1 S6 i$ a0 ]development.

Hutongs: _( b3 F* d. D& L& T1 X+ N in the old days were residential area where people actually lived- d- m+ }2 u4 ]9 r2 j there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 0 `! p6 M; n. K0 E' c( nin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not / G) {; m [9 x* v1 m- r6 H4 U2 N0 Thave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you0 ?4 h# H$ Q0 A& H will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.* e: L2 o7 V* w& R9 i5 \. C Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date6 G# g# U0 m' }; a0 ? to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 8 A5 m& S2 _, Z* Mto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses # Y/ j9 t* y* O* ]$ A6 dsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically % v3 S$ C- H! O& F( nunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ! |4 c1 w. R- Y3 y- @- @7 Ylive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 6 N$ y( k" Y# y& S% P; Q; |hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 3 a5 E$ y* {+ ^" I9 R! zbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the ; L0 n- }7 ~. t& U4 i' @3 c0 M7 d& Kproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 0 a% e6 L, q- R1 j+ ~; @% q5 S7 {* ~renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong- ^0 O8 I) m2 I. r! } Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how% ^( R( J1 x4 ~* L+ X' k7 v% p4 s people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 7 [; e/ \6 [' a* F# t% Btorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished a+ ^1 h$ b$ I; ?* I9 O# Ymemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". h' }" E T! [6 }& WNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are, R0 P2 L8 X& r aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially3 g9 l& N6 S, m; S6 Y1 q2 \ non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image * k; r; c' b0 dof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these5 @ |( i2 C+ y9 N2 B9 c: |3 U- t! w; v Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those# p, y# t# I$ I! s: \' P3 z7 P: V people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 7 W) v5 D, c8 r; v4 Y, G, dmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 6 D: q2 D1 s. S, M5 ?$ l. Z/ ^. | `of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before5 Q: m1 I4 f3 P$ \+ Z2 Z. b "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all, }$ W- k1 U" O/ d1 z people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise1 i# A. C$ X+ U$ r: l g$ H- `/ d3 M apartments are the way to go? No.7 E, g$ K \. Z* h$ M! J & R$ U8 e$ L+ j4 E- e . B, z+ U% M9 p& [4 ?) k1 n

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the * M" v7 S1 _+ u( Bsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 6 P- _/ C! Z9 Z# m'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make - j# S" |; @5 bno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so& S; M. I# R6 p fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 4 R: ~) d- E9 [2 J: H2 tresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ) o7 E5 F0 m) e4 a# \. BBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is $ M, r$ [: {# S9 Dunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-31 06:16 , Processed in 0.147027 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部