服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6404|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 5 d3 q1 p5 w, v9 `3 W* z: {- {" Narchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider0 X6 S: Y+ ]- K* {& y5 @( [ Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"& {8 ~ n5 z$ f" l9 @ city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.- H: D: B+ r' W# l) L4 j4 } According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,1 H6 c- h1 V3 [2 k$ I( Z 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 9 b) K+ x3 l U- L' K, vManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within # W9 D! W3 t0 S* z8 ?. uhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 9 i9 q8 T# M, ?, I; Ieach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera - h% T7 _8 F: b3 B, v/ \0 X, Wand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is5 _6 X+ Z& f8 l, S5 }: Q! _6 R+ J harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are# {& J4 I! J2 J4 W. w# A: H descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and3 Z0 O& f: V H0 o3 R* P) G: j forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 6 |# c! K8 e! l% ^0 _! P/ ywas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great ; m* n/ ~. ~9 o1 Eimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,& n8 D3 k6 y# P' Z F# g$ ` and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong7 m: ~% t5 n' ~: m, n2 I has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment $ E. k. b5 T6 {* c8 O, u- E* t, ]of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that: i+ f& b# U% L6 O! A8 ]" @ no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 5 a6 h" H+ }2 r# _& z% Qonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 0 Y: J; X& I/ G( B6 ]! ~$ ? U9 ~. G! Xsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government4 u% A; ~" |: ~' B/ t want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move . H% |7 r0 I/ lto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ( U& l% w& h. ^' \2 p"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,8 w7 M2 Y% z! [/ I0 k- R this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are4 d; }; F' T. ` x1 K$ Z5 S still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to X/ F" ]( j: G- ` "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make " g( W# |* v7 \$ R- R( C1 gmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was+ h" M9 [, `+ b a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 9 w/ F1 j1 k' o0 Bparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across( w L- G; i% D) Q: T$ E: P0 x the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural, \# Y% b+ S0 }) I importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for( v* {% J+ z1 {! E h development.

Hutongs# V3 v5 Y. K; l9 Y9 f, [" e in the old days were residential area where people actually lived # g. S) ~ E7 c$ othere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions7 |, [# V3 w. d' b% k$ F, x in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ! S9 h8 |6 h7 {have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 7 e+ y% T% t5 `9 t6 A4 g8 s( cwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.; d- u+ m+ _" s; t2 \2 A: e6 s Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date" |9 S7 u/ H2 ~2 W2 Y3 Y to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used* A/ q0 n" I' s! Y to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses4 R ]0 K0 @0 X support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically9 k0 R9 h# c7 z& l$ c unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to& q9 D2 o; T! r( d- P3 s live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,( t4 m/ f! D' q1 N, c, [ hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the$ o4 O, A" {/ v8 L! ]% o' i: L2 } balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the ) L+ F2 W2 K' M! v8 x$ P% aproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ! }4 ^) q* d7 l% N$ c3 M" C+ Qrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 4 j6 \4 W! t7 p/ j; V2 I% E( gMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how. f) X$ `1 i2 m3 p1 | people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be & ^( Y9 |4 i0 Ltorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 1 P4 M! K; v$ T/ Z; M( `memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". : s; v* m- o5 A5 ~% jNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are " G. s/ k- h) x) `% `+ p9 E, m# c; [aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially ( H2 R6 R: P Q6 a2 b; U7 y8 _5 Jnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image3 Z; D7 Q& I- d- M4 @ of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these2 s" H0 z' y2 U& [$ d9 y0 A+ Y3 Z% u. e' E Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those ; M( q6 g) q j3 X/ X2 D2 l8 o( u/ jpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they " k9 _* V- v" ~1 Y3 b6 I8 v1 l* Ymay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some4 g; f7 ]' b* R of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before- [; E) s3 w5 @; F# O! R "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all $ p' Z# V, z' w# k2 b6 }6 Bpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise2 V3 g% v6 m' E: l. [ apartments are the way to go? No.; v% b# R P1 x1 X& u3 I7 s* M2 X : f8 J# Q% ~% j( j/ y ) _+ ]% }0 [7 J. S! q

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the) A. E D( `6 z2 `$ i: b4 d situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this t; `* s6 o% p5 `5 ['progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 2 G) F( D7 v, Z9 A) _no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so & Q I* [7 y4 ?- d& \# _fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 0 j! \7 F9 \8 {& u: H$ fresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless/ F# u. ?! O8 }5 I/ A" Y% y' V Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is6 i+ d( r3 x5 S) _ unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-12 09:31 , Processed in 0.118324 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部