服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6301|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 6 x. K0 n1 ]! [9 `6 g" }architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider - F0 _3 ?$ D+ ~Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" $ [% G- ~* l: c. u- R. ?4 w7 Tcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.; E4 I! j" y: U9 g. R According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,' J+ a- e: G3 N 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of0 P9 x( u$ X$ [/ b! e& T2 w+ y Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within & x3 a, P/ k7 m$ A1 O! n# thutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among( s X3 ^( T8 [+ C F/ D( i, @% U each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera' X& m- Z& x H* y% I4 R* e and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is7 M, |" A# y4 a! R( {% b harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are& k+ ^$ O4 [- Q4 \% z1 |, U descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and1 F4 ^3 K/ g% Z3 ?2 x. C5 [ forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I( R3 n* j l( @) [, z7 e4 R was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great . M/ e2 l: n2 j. @# l& z5 qimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ' P9 Y9 Y( b, X; {4 R& Fand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong - ?, V1 Z/ c2 ]; f! I% G3 V- p6 Hhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment& w2 J! d7 L1 u6 h+ r4 g of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 1 P h5 }# B8 vno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are/ E. K- L7 m1 u& k. X: _; \2 C only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a $ i8 K8 l9 s, R& {6 {% _+ ~/ a- csort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government , t+ |8 S( v* Awant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move9 G0 R7 y, B. t. k5 ~$ B to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is8 o/ D& j b2 W; D "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,. H4 z& _# ?% H4 ~, T1 F. X0 _, l this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are+ A- K3 i3 ?0 a still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to& h" O3 r% w- s6 N+ @- f1 r8 B "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 4 r' N8 d% s j$ H; g+ Imoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was& H, `0 m- b, V9 E6 ^ a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a # v2 f( }. d) \6 b8 N7 bparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across # ?% j+ k/ M* O/ D* wthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 0 F- T, u8 T( a+ x- _4 ]importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for' z. I/ b6 N4 ?& d4 p: y& t# n development.

Hutongs! I! U; ?0 k0 U* V! v; a in the old days were residential area where people actually lived + g0 D7 m, |2 m D/ B* {/ h) |6 [9 ythere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions ) K* a% Z. U# j* X) D9 ]in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not$ k+ a; g$ z- C7 E7 |$ m3 [: q have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 2 [4 @+ A$ K: v& [will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ! D2 x1 E$ N( n/ d- ZFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 5 \2 l* z8 L; Z ]; U4 ^# ]to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 5 Y% U/ E. G7 \to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses7 V% g2 R |5 p+ I- ^8 t. T support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically" L/ a) Y& z6 X8 M( w* I unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to( |; z. Z8 @/ j1 k; }& L+ ] live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,# R& [& K- o+ Q) n hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the " Q. Y. |0 O% H( |) J& Sbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 6 B3 z2 Y- z0 l! e# Q) Hproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be$ R/ g) i3 f0 j0 e/ ? renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong6 S- R, _/ O8 c8 E4 u Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 4 F" {% a2 W$ tpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be * o, y9 }1 c0 M6 X! g3 E1 ^; ?torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished i/ @5 }) d; V+ F4 o memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".1 C% _/ y0 p$ z- h% v9 Y: P( Y Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ! W6 Z8 t: k$ baligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially2 G6 {( b8 s6 ~+ R, e non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image0 e0 T' l2 b; |. X of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these$ O9 u0 l* Z6 K: C7 r Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those2 M# Q: c6 N) p/ ~2 r( [ people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they8 ]# Z8 ^. K9 |. Z, N may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some % Z- e8 d6 d4 G, \/ A1 Vof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before C- h2 `) t* H; Z8 v9 F* | "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 7 t8 `- y' [% ~2 k Mpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise! \/ P5 u/ J, y7 g' P2 r( C4 P apartments are the way to go? No. 2 o- b4 n$ |$ ]9 F3 I# V 1 ?. m# y! W$ H' A, u' u3 G) U + K/ J; ?4 I+ H2 A5 H

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 5 ]; [: d7 q7 z" R' G# G9 ssituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this7 c4 K' K8 N7 B% |& O2 R 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make " W' t% j/ o7 f' e6 ~5 z: I! Uno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so. c; B. e9 B+ F- l- R: O6 ~ fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant N3 Z2 V2 A# n8 C' m5 [resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ' e$ n f3 X$ O( }0 ~4 XBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is r5 f+ m4 ]! \& |% _+ y unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-17 17:10 , Processed in 0.123827 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部