服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6315|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its5 u( D( v' [+ ^, R: u7 g$ m+ h architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 4 g* u! A: ~1 q9 hBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" . i3 A% k" |5 I: B+ a" Zcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ; J+ f' Y: [/ _( Q) d i7 MAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,4 v' Z' U4 I# U2 s, N 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 7 ?% s5 I/ F" _5 j: c. \1 jManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within/ i. o) Y6 E X( R H2 m hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among- P! O3 j5 e: K* r: J. V each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 9 o! H( ?5 z' c& f w& y$ |/ P/ yand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is9 k! M! R+ ~# N$ R harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 5 R8 T, \# k8 x4 {- ~+ P! G* z' ddescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 0 N( R* |; g6 i# M+ p( a+ Kforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ]& m2 W' ~- o& W$ X) ? was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great - b% L& O5 N1 p7 y' D( b% gimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, " ^+ O$ @5 B8 qand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong6 X8 q N/ h7 V% P8 {$ w has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 3 p3 ^1 L6 ]: Tof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 6 u, P. d3 ?# `! q# P" Pno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are, v7 v- h4 s b1 V only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a" W/ a2 D8 o% u* v% ~' Y3 d& [ sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government5 p+ X" M# ]# Q! ~8 _ want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move & c8 U ?3 J3 ?2 n1 pto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is + B6 N% @5 n) H+ k5 I( r: |6 h"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,5 V) w0 S- ^5 V4 z7 K; o this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are/ j. H1 r8 o' R6 c7 W ]6 G still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to0 S. C5 o6 I. ]" o' P; w "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make2 |5 l8 a, |( V! B money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 1 T8 C' N: p& t9 S) x, P( P" M5 q3 |+ Sa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a . P9 ]9 d; a6 D7 o( a7 d3 _2 {parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across' P# z7 z3 @ v the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural! F! {0 I& w9 n$ X+ W4 G importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for# H9 u* q6 S% N development.

Hutongs3 q# g3 V' Y( |- `) d5 P! J in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 4 H+ ?5 t9 {* ^* u* d4 vthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions0 c& G2 v0 a- C in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 1 H7 {% ]$ i2 C! ohave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you J: L# y. ]- J7 t% M will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. c5 C$ w+ I E+ RFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date" E: {) Y/ @7 Q% {# ?; k to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used$ ^1 J+ o6 m# @: Y( A5 m8 q to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 2 |% G( q w7 R# g9 G6 Jsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically2 c$ a6 o$ A" \6 O7 w/ R6 h unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to * {4 ^2 V8 e! P, a& j6 O: X- Jlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, . v' j; ]. O) y6 d4 vhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the0 I/ K# B+ H& w6 h balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the" r! G! z g1 w$ L; g; F project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be9 D- a, d6 [. @9 y renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 7 Z# b3 K' n+ L* PMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how + K4 o6 F4 p. S6 tpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be% ]9 d/ R; L* ]) H$ l torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished0 W- Y& X; r( h4 [ memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". . H2 L3 e% B- P/ W% a' R- KNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are; U8 e3 F. ?' J( F: c aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 0 }/ X8 f% v% fnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image* [3 d! A* }" D& E7 `0 R of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these# L6 M. H5 L; V2 L8 @ Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those; W: D, v4 d8 l% R6 F0 a! j$ j people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they0 |2 Q) G2 Q/ X- w3 v may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some4 e# A& m+ n3 Y* _8 \ of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before O! h! A* @7 g+ l "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all" ]' t- [3 c7 Q0 C people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise! p+ L% J8 B p6 V' I$ q apartments are the way to go? No. 9 ]7 c* e, E. \5 U, T8 g% \. [, i ! P5 I2 c$ a' \: N: g2 D0 E2 L : A' F: F* Q8 Y. R

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the# x9 {# I2 Y3 t" I+ p$ C& ` situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this % F& d, f, W, ]1 B6 K+ R2 T'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 2 }: w$ x3 o- w7 Q* Eno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so. s }$ q9 \* ?5 T4 h' `; ?: T" l fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant4 s5 L, E" a% T resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 6 x5 B0 W' _* b* QBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is8 P- \' a% w$ j4 W5 H unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-25 11:03 , Processed in 0.262883 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部