UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
2 a1 W# d! K, d. i9 Varchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
8 r& `2 ?0 A) V" }Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"' g/ z0 V: k P: ^2 ~9 q
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.+ h3 N) M8 u9 J: N# B8 |* q, q B. P
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
, P8 ?, L5 C8 m; |9 I3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
6 i% l% {9 N8 [' LManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
; ?+ M/ k; r$ n/ D. o0 Yhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among! S1 J3 j8 a! f% M- |
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
) O5 r1 J2 G+ k4 Z, c8 m. g. K8 [and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
( I. D4 B* C2 j) v+ e( v- U( U2 Wharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are( r9 S- r4 y( Z' K' r
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and, p, g6 ^! e, J2 `! j6 y- I
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I, R4 `! t/ B+ m$ [# }/ ~
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
+ l8 r4 u3 G. z" C2 O* qimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,+ A2 q7 t7 `4 J' ~8 J
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong1 |/ ], J6 J q6 @9 g" Q
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
8 }2 N' r. E0 zof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that) j6 {6 o5 A. T' g+ c
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
! l( F1 P+ C* H) U& ?) [2 Y0 ponly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a. N" ]. J0 ~- U5 v9 K
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government( h1 J! w6 j8 B5 v: ]3 u9 i2 p
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
9 E( a8 j/ a; Q2 Yto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
0 |) b! w5 G, ~% {4 K I) l1 q2 z. T"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
8 k8 C7 c" b! a! Q8 U) Xthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
% R( I: B- r2 Y3 R% U# Ystill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to3 b- e/ {6 b+ A+ b! X5 P( \2 S7 V
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make. o! K8 o/ T3 c$ V& z
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
$ I( I. x; {+ T- u$ ia beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a8 I1 c- T k. b- ]2 X8 a
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
3 j3 g6 l5 S7 \& f" l( y+ F2 `* B% _the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural- d1 ^$ {$ j/ b( U9 m
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
% j5 w8 m9 i4 T4 Ddevelopment.
Hutongs! [& [9 F8 q4 W+ ], r6 T
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
) C/ |8 u) W# w6 Z5 s) X! w. T. vthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
" R$ T3 a- p# f; M& A; L9 ]0 q! Z- x( [. o0 kin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not) M$ a* k0 k) u. R
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you, {8 P8 k7 o8 M% a
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
7 `3 t5 {9 f. A) x8 TFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
$ L* w6 p2 o% L' Y* C# P# K" xto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
0 e& {$ y) \( F: p. z2 T6 T9 [to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
1 F3 q* Q% l- s+ |% w/ ksupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
' P( \3 y! O0 E. Z" g, h0 \. Ounfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to) I" P3 d& w' \* L' S
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
4 I0 q* D% P7 p+ H" ^" Uhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
6 T4 P9 z( k' T. k6 Z* ^3 ybalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
) T$ W6 o# P& @, L# vproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be! F. `, x7 z9 y$ K D
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong0 a$ L) D2 _/ o: i- r7 i8 g
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how( O5 p9 g; j. i3 O' ?: I: T
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be7 k# K& C7 B+ z6 Y& P
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
# P3 i! Y$ o0 K/ smemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
' C( ? G! d5 y1 t) W3 g( y2 xNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are) g3 y; B" f1 }. |6 s9 i3 j; v/ C l3 P
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially6 `; Y) M6 v+ B) Q" e6 ~) S
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
/ w3 N6 V5 z- n [1 s0 Qof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
7 r$ I, s" b8 w/ l% `$ FHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those5 M+ q' w' `6 t9 T
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
@4 L# H u, d1 l( X; @may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some0 }. l; X: Q$ k0 A% e
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before/ ^+ j) R4 k' c4 k& p! S
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all( M1 c4 s, {* A+ Z/ X
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
6 p. {% O7 D& U) U8 f& tapartments are the way to go? No.
* e9 [, S( m# t" Z5 w
, Q- b+ D4 Z" Y2 x4 Z
2 ^* G! s/ Z9 C) I6 [
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
4 p9 L1 T4 y" K4 d% u0 qsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
4 n. j! N& D$ x) n: c'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make4 \6 T3 m, o3 @4 T* c# w7 q
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so! T6 S- W- }- ~4 q) y" m. N
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
; w0 U! t3 g D- b- D- Y5 hresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
5 ^7 W- A9 K" B( `: ?2 F( fBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
" K! s a a* d+ ^! ]( f. aunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|