服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6544|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its / u7 D& {+ o' z) S" {0 Warchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider( e A: @+ V2 G: D4 ]" } Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" , D o# ~7 w# R5 ^city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.% z# p( t4 b0 G3 E- T4 V According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,' d3 m* t4 y4 |" D) ~ U 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 0 g" u( p0 c& G, b; I* i5 v" q7 eManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within ) y& I z5 m! b; L$ dhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among; F9 a- X/ C; L each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera3 G2 [( ~* H- D! y% {* ]. ~; a and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is % R3 G ^+ O6 |/ Bharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are! P. g. G* W# E! ^) g5 { descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and : g7 Y! P4 Z% b `' yforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I3 f$ L/ e. y/ n, u was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great4 a2 ] _2 f& G* X4 R5 H" A0 ` impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, " K$ [4 G- P; k2 h9 Hand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong7 T1 n$ d( M# g( L) `" J r has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment& t# b# W1 |+ I6 N* K of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that! Q V% K' D8 O9 h, p3 p" N no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 9 T) r" m9 ~1 a( |only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a7 V" n8 ?% t8 f5 P sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 9 [) j( o6 z: U3 S$ o' k2 b& ]want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move " u" T: C: F6 o2 I' W; Bto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is" p8 L d1 Z0 B; x& ?2 c "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ) s) b A6 M2 b' v) h& \- cthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 6 c) @: I4 H( o, |8 Q) r6 R& V. Ustill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ( k9 j8 a K% A( @+ V) {"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make # o7 [4 g j! e4 m& zmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was7 e! Z7 T- l; G' a5 H. }6 } a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a - S" ?# d5 \, t9 I; I- f* `parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across : x/ d, E$ z. c; sthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ! M8 d( Z/ Q+ g1 ~, Nimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for- D! o y1 h, |# G* f development.

Hutongs 0 n. g8 t5 _2 E1 e- l! S- I4 J% O8 ^in the old days were residential area where people actually lived9 a# D9 A$ X5 T% l there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions " D$ Y4 l7 r! j* H0 [0 I2 oin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not2 u4 q9 J: {5 j# v$ ] have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you$ q1 q. Z% n2 X% x' d; {6 z2 q- E# { will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. & E8 f9 F9 C) b* O* e! I0 C) JFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 5 i+ s& l- J! W. [+ ^( E+ ~to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used/ ^" b$ p) K/ Y( o$ i$ j6 \ to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses / p5 g, K% Y5 M, X! H4 Ssupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 1 g1 P, q' s* F% D4 |$ q. d$ sunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 7 a: ?$ M" W! K0 mlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,& g& z- ^4 U" w! e2 L% e8 J0 S hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the2 c* l) s) F' {" H% P balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 4 F5 i. G( \( _; [6 g1 t2 F" F1 Cproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be $ A4 T9 y0 k6 u" Mrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong" E$ R6 W" Z1 J Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how ) \( D9 }, @3 l$ S" \1 l8 zpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be: W& |( D, K' T2 C, U2 _8 L torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished9 @# u- D/ g9 A" v memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". ( `; J1 h) F8 LNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are, J0 U% ~3 q. W1 o" t+ _7 R/ G aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 3 B& ~: h2 _ F9 Y% p4 o5 W, Y0 n) nnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image, k5 b1 K2 J0 X of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these. I1 R3 W0 i$ e3 g% o o) K Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those " D- s3 g. X# @: a5 s3 |people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they) @. M! T8 c4 s' A/ c( S may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some6 I7 L9 c7 c- D f' D& O5 e+ ^ of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before) I! H% L \( z8 B: _$ ~* a+ G/ I "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all2 N# K& F# A* Y$ p5 V) z- W' Y people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise) [. |/ ^6 X/ a3 j# o apartments are the way to go? No.$ Z3 p7 x _( b6 c2 w t0 t $ n$ s4 x$ u- e3 U! c. ? " Q0 f; Z3 x" T& ?

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the* M+ o$ m3 p" j; g0 r- K9 V; [ situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 8 L. w7 \6 j+ f+ I$ O6 G'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make + u+ {& O/ Z$ m: K1 s) v3 Ano money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 0 W5 F9 d# j# J/ B# a7 Zfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant : ]7 _; X2 i( S* u' M9 ]7 Kresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless2 A1 m; u1 S. ` Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is! K$ W0 ~& {& M( ^' M1 g unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-23 08:37 , Processed in 0.121415 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部