UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
5 T- K6 w' v+ v) f" Aarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider4 Q( L% E9 g2 n4 v; O/ u( d
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"' j; T# J: h0 Y, ^, X M
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
6 l3 Z: P$ D( ~According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
) l6 u) |6 c# O( d! i- U' F9 i: D3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
2 A+ \( I& A" w& a' Y) K$ QManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
( M& m/ X7 o9 c7 ?hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
* l; U! A- D( c# ~' eeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
' C1 a% O# c$ G: @ A: {% i! k- sand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
/ E% S4 e4 }$ E2 ^3 j6 R0 X; o& Aharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are" H" {$ `+ o' M/ w' e& U
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
3 s9 e1 R+ }4 n5 oforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I3 v+ d; s- U, x8 z; D
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great; z0 b! ?) J4 u6 }3 Q( ?/ ]) K
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,1 j# G6 p; K/ e1 {) m; M% d
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong: g( O( e( I. g; a, b" f
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment5 g: O5 g1 [, C* ]
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that" f1 P9 Z' w- ~0 P" b: m
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are$ l& M4 q& A! u5 d: W
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a& b+ _6 o6 G( r! m7 r1 z( B' Q$ _
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
8 S. K& }6 x3 I% I" Cwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
- b! b3 g9 D( F) K1 kto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
0 h2 H5 U0 p, [+ O1 s"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
l9 Z' }3 r0 h6 _7 _; S( E5 Dthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are* u J( ^8 U0 A9 Z. w- f( y9 A
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to3 d# M0 Q& p7 R
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
7 C& f. ?+ X9 d3 Q$ d; ]% V# e Mmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
, q% E( {+ W& `) @+ l6 ?8 Fa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
" K1 V! s5 N+ u% L- Sparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
8 ?8 L5 I9 ?, ?! }5 W* |/ Wthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural8 U$ P( `, ?$ _5 N# k. V- ~
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
$ z8 ~% H5 l9 R# @9 m' D1 m! N& Udevelopment.
Hutongs
6 j" f: q2 T% ]7 t; Q! T% O jin the old days were residential area where people actually lived
/ m, P. X+ v. I! y1 dthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
4 [3 X5 e2 J1 Nin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not4 r/ B7 M4 C2 g5 K! p
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
# z0 g/ g8 Q& J/ twill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.+ E6 b2 ^9 `. f8 x1 w
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
1 `2 @, R2 F2 _; q d* ]9 xto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used; N( q% s! D5 s1 o4 `) l% |
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
0 @! V; @2 X; xsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically( p4 i6 S' o4 z0 o
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to/ _- V8 @& i; k: |7 P9 ]9 g
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
% E+ H, t9 H, `' ~, R* _; u; ohutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
_% x" }4 S" {/ @balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
1 o: X7 |% V, i/ @5 G/ x5 Mproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
6 y p8 N% K* c( t( C" Rrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong [- ?2 S2 ~& U, f
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
; u& w- ~0 _5 e9 q) kpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be+ B2 `2 u7 c' J5 U* E* Y& G8 r
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
% B+ B5 |& u" e. O9 cmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".- u! O# m3 I0 L9 `8 B
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are* {4 U9 H2 D$ N4 w
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
2 c: l9 ]3 Y" D( j jnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
: c& P5 W# r- R' v8 |% y% {of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
+ }0 n$ s9 d) P" [$ n- x3 J" ^Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
& X/ v6 c! y7 w; q& Npeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they- C; l9 e) {" F5 P$ k( C. g
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some# e0 R0 U$ ?6 |2 ]' K8 ]
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before- ^7 w& ?) K/ l4 P# l
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
. W' m$ u, ]+ P/ Z/ @) g7 c7 Cpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise* m0 R/ n5 K# M% V- w
apartments are the way to go? No." |! K' f2 k6 k+ S
2 w3 X( J" h: J1 [# p! X# p
3 j9 V$ a* N* b( j5 d- c9 m8 T# f# B
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the7 f2 ?8 w4 o8 o
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
! k1 i x2 u$ M; D5 R X2 z6 A'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make1 k( p! p l3 d8 E8 B
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
5 D, _% v1 D2 J* P1 `3 P2 lfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant4 X0 y$ a& \5 W3 l
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless: a; h3 M2 V5 I4 m6 O
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is! p. M- G. n( f
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|