UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its: S4 G0 V6 o9 I8 v) c& P# O, K' D
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
. m7 E; p* s7 U; |Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
; a3 n" G9 {0 z2 ^: w9 r9 \city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.8 H1 D% `; e I0 W6 N- a3 {
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
; g. X+ x, I, f: k- _- b3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of" b5 j) h p9 `1 }& |; P8 X9 L! {
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
; s2 e' O7 t1 F9 U* P- O) \8 {hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
6 J' J- \- n8 n% N: n! l% |( A( S/ eeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera( X0 p2 O/ _5 \! N, y
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
+ L" \. Q D. v0 o% n ^3 xharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
) k" \; B: u$ Z* o0 K; O4 Gdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
5 B0 y' n' S& G. X; N5 Z: Rforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
% n5 |% Z V7 T0 G- d+ s n, swas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
: O+ t5 \# G6 rimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
2 N' n3 ~, k+ Q! f! U5 v0 B. band we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong6 l% A( Z8 C$ x, j4 j& t r
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment+ N' w: G0 j# i m. P% n; P1 p; b
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
! [. z! ?3 W5 S6 k: `' qno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
) t7 S9 |( D: d0 `only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a- E* @% s# n5 m' u$ ~
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government$ h; ~/ J" b3 s U( z
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
5 x ^: ^+ ?5 ^4 Vto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is% W: b$ v6 O: X' W8 s U( A
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
! [7 ~$ I. H2 e: b3 a/ ythis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
; G; V0 p8 }) S6 Tstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to% T! \' y3 Z3 f% b- Y0 s
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
8 c5 D1 U* q8 q. h: q( Tmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was. i- [$ a- m. k$ _( b5 v6 N3 k
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
6 o! V& B, F& U' Uparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
, G7 P2 h/ Z5 C, W( x6 A' l' k" Sthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural- ?; x2 w+ W% Z6 G2 @; k, i
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
+ ]9 U* T- Z! L- Ydevelopment.
Hutongs5 M# n) h ~9 E1 e
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
. D# I9 B! k, M# I s. zthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions+ y ]' E$ K+ G" }6 g
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
' a( ^& ~$ p( p. Y R! shave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
9 M+ O& J0 v' E6 d0 i6 H9 I2 F& E' awill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.! O: N* @: C* q- Z
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date% M* L) v7 z) Z' V3 X
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
! }# L" f( z/ }. k% ~* Sto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
B) G! U2 I4 e' zsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
! c! P. ?2 t6 i3 u( p' [unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
. j- a2 U9 ?6 o/ l Flive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
/ F u* i; c7 f% m0 k" O& Ihutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
8 `8 K' j- J* E1 kbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the/ D' ?. d' F. Y1 w5 `* y) C1 x
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
; `& g2 b0 y) W1 \: w$ N' hrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong; P8 j& k+ ?- ]. ]1 z- y
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how, n0 x- K4 f+ S/ z; @
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
2 z2 i, Y1 R% Utorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished/ P( A( I+ `% U
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
, W( @0 R: ~ w9 a# m+ D5 fNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
! F# ` J. Z- v8 B8 Jaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
+ `8 S1 a5 H6 W2 J b; g. u( Q! rnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
4 u- L1 D3 j5 \) H+ _6 D, mof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
/ m) r- H+ q1 l9 b4 R8 EHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those. c6 S D% O g7 T# i/ I. j
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
; a7 _& ?! m! }3 u. M; \0 q0 p r9 S* Tmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
' C, G* O% Y5 q- _$ n, R1 o" Iof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
% l! [$ q4 @3 L# V+ r: ?"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
6 ^- |" ?4 Z v; kpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
2 d! B4 U7 g0 _7 Q; Napartments are the way to go? No.8 l' K% {- S# W6 }6 B
: Z1 o' k& ?2 {5 e8 r & f8 o9 ~, j! d; U
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
) c% U) s+ G! o* [situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
* j1 Z; Z: f6 w1 r% V* a'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make8 D6 n& H- P" ~9 o
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so6 J2 |- j, n6 e
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
- H" ^7 B/ G9 y- hresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
4 x& g9 U3 J- W2 d2 ~$ dBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is! ?! F8 X! C! g( k0 K+ N1 _$ K
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|