UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its8 L. D; x% t0 G
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider2 h- c2 y3 H2 d% h/ `( c
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
- J& G- f4 F7 dcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. I7 y+ K: @2 ^- b- W
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
}9 J* j, f# A. B3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of0 X( H9 ~: K2 _' C+ X4 h3 \6 I
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
1 s$ h( d1 ^% ]2 b$ `7 thutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among- z+ s2 a, B- L1 g$ Y
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera! T/ G. C* W' H) @: I, E
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
C( z4 H4 n; |, L8 |/ y& Tharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
; [* m& [& ^. K( H2 Z4 kdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and6 _+ M2 T4 ^, X' X
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I, N1 q, K8 ? ~2 N+ W
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
* l7 [) [+ q' Y+ Y: L ?impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,1 M" i$ z! W) E+ a2 N1 H* m
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
9 w/ i/ E' k. shas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment; p6 O! L- _4 B Z# o+ t
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
7 K1 B# {" W" B( u) q4 Fno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are" t* ~+ O6 n& }8 K" N* t0 p; ]
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
g9 R% L o6 [0 \/ w# |sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government% H; z& ?1 q t+ C$ }
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move. Q( c! T) W6 S0 k$ Q
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is U5 N! s2 p- A' F
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,' u. }) N: s% N0 E$ {) S+ q3 |+ i/ v
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
! h2 z" }/ J8 {0 k0 [+ _4 Nstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
3 R" e# o5 ~0 v, J"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
2 K% p1 ~# W& v: B: h' \money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
3 ]' l$ ~; ?# e5 q9 H9 Fa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a: Y( W$ G# B. Q* v) J7 u. }
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
$ e# X9 h" g: B; W3 [) | g. q1 Q8 ^the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural$ I. ]. \$ o$ I9 _% _
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
1 T$ c1 @% |. kdevelopment.
Hutongs
0 M) }0 y& j- k) L4 [in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
# ^* a) N1 T" l, qthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions4 C3 s {- I0 S- H% F6 \
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
+ Y! e' A% t# k4 _! u; u, P+ p' Vhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you! g ^/ D3 H& o b9 ]# A
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
! ], ^. C/ o, A8 R3 l+ V* oFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date" e/ @2 [6 M1 N
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used) f! j% B3 w: A
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
) T L& A# x; T) r/ _ P/ xsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
) m4 L4 v _- Z% C, {( V& e nunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
; m q. p: ~, j5 L/ ?) Y- mlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,5 C) H3 w: C: l0 o& t
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
$ n& z% }; P& c9 l Mbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
" p% `) K. k& h4 {! Y/ Vproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
8 p5 d. `2 ^; E3 arenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
+ H9 K4 f) W: W6 k {Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
* v8 ]: d" _, k: H h _people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
) {" Z# Y1 y' q% o) P0 rtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished# ?! H# v" L% a3 @% E6 N5 n! j) ]
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
, e) {5 I# p* C4 j5 f+ ?/ NNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
4 k3 z3 E9 X+ @6 M! D7 K3 l( M/ paligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
: |: a+ N }9 a: `8 Nnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
% @- Q4 E- P" K/ d( jof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these( R S0 b5 }7 l9 D9 j
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those: o1 `* g5 y: { d/ m2 y
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they f- l) C- q* a/ U( ~ A B
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some/ N( |: n% D7 T2 g2 L8 f
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before) u. y T; T2 K6 W3 J+ ?" L( M& ^+ y
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all5 _, a" e! q( F& p9 k# t8 K
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise4 h7 H# j1 d; z2 g$ F
apartments are the way to go? No.
' I g/ q& n4 E# P- C, P
. G3 J, e5 \( ] 6 @; n- }/ R4 l% R, J9 e, A
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
, R7 I0 ?, B/ _' i/ lsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
' {+ X1 m6 c2 W* @; b'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
3 P% i' z- a- u" I- t4 T/ V! Tno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
g& G, @, g( s, Lfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
# q+ J f4 z' v3 Y5 \1 \resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
+ x9 o8 }7 g7 V$ YBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
) R* ~( u; P; r! h5 u3 U# ~unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|