UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
- Y+ J6 ~, K$ p" b( q& sarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
+ m0 {5 ?' F8 iBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"% f& ^7 ~; P0 o( [
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
5 p0 p/ _- D8 eAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,6 X" v. d3 v: D% Y
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of$ j: p4 B1 e, K
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within! N3 }$ w! c' T+ X# y
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
- |4 r6 D: y7 E1 Neach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
- K* X" U9 E9 }* C# J& v4 Hand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is3 w* O3 z! f4 c
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are) z6 x: c* ]# O
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and: {' w; c& ~0 p$ O6 c) h' N
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I9 E5 U: F1 S' S/ `7 N. b
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great/ {! g' |/ n0 d% b
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,5 S* \ _/ l, N( ^: w
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
( y( i# D: r i( x; ihas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment4 X( Z% Z/ a1 a, i4 K! \) g
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
% U9 k, I4 p) K% v) rno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
) Y4 x7 Y: \% ^" T0 z7 `only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a W- o* Z/ o' Y4 e& x8 k* `$ I' Z; S
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government* ?: F" w& T6 C. C# T
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
$ u5 {; @4 J6 nto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
9 w$ L' H/ q2 v"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
$ X; {; X Y, Vthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
: a% t% N& u, X4 c0 Zstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to1 w7 B x1 u( L
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make; C9 g+ @, Y6 j- O. _% u& R
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was. |& x! K$ N/ f) [% U3 V! Y4 X
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
2 H" X& |4 q& e! J% aparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across" Z$ R; G" u3 }& b2 w6 q; l
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
; k+ G+ m% P/ r* N, {, x* Wimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
" \" G& f. y' n8 H6 ` }development.
Hutongs
. Z' J# t( N% min the old days were residential area where people actually lived
; v0 G: ]% R7 s5 lthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions, b* |1 {- o3 R; N; j3 {2 s; @ X
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
% w7 Y3 U" ?6 X$ _have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
- _3 z1 X& S9 q* _0 Vwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
3 q0 ~: `' t$ o$ TFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date/ d6 ]1 d1 Y$ Q- D9 W" U
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used2 R! U }, }, n1 C' i& l; D# r
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses$ Q2 X9 }" v/ s1 _
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
% Z# k8 d& B1 k5 g" u6 @- [, g' b( ?; f. Funfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to8 v6 E' Z! Q+ L& F, d/ E
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
+ t U. A% i0 f9 U$ z: Z2 `1 }hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the* }! s& o! _3 k" @
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the6 a* V; |* Y- W# |/ v
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be4 \3 h4 L/ ?- j, \4 ^2 E
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong/ u8 R. d0 ~" Q' W
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how7 w0 k% P+ ^; F, Z) w
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be& E3 ~! x$ S* H4 T# M
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished; U! H/ x8 j. e I
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".- K' o' w; W. Z, S5 |
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
6 R% b* z; ?; y8 C- j* B3 Valigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
; @1 x) c" r. X3 R* P7 unon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
" e" S- c2 c f( aof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
8 h$ u$ m# W: M8 t! ]# Q7 ^Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
2 d2 S! }) I2 ?- e- e0 Gpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they. |+ v0 O7 Y4 K5 I
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some& @3 B$ U2 q$ ~( G, Q! J( X
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before! [2 v* V8 Q8 V/ L( |* ~
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
0 K3 K; C4 ^; g' ?1 N# X: Rpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
7 B) P" ^! I8 l: l6 Y8 o" E- `0 qapartments are the way to go? No.
$ n1 p; p5 G0 o6 G" {6 C 2 P" K9 n3 s3 N2 A" R* h
) t' V: c6 s m
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the9 p$ B6 B- z0 ~+ E" s
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this1 o- K- U; j( b
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
: H6 V+ T# e3 G" v" l H9 ~no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
9 O2 V4 q3 n# I8 d- n- cfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
8 I: X2 O+ u9 t' {6 Fresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
4 L. r# V9 H9 Y9 X# F- w/ hBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is5 F! r g/ K, j( i5 ~* e
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|