服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6771|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its1 G4 E: S5 ~. p architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider N3 n3 X. p% G" X4 z% [Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"5 l# b5 ]6 W @8 J city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. , p9 ^7 K q1 S( s+ o- zAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty," D* h+ l8 B% J/ A; V: ~. y 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of" t& U2 z s( G" [( o Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within $ k. g9 `9 p4 A/ V: R+ ?hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 5 |) |6 ]2 J+ y9 H4 o8 a+ Seach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera$ ~# |) v Y4 A* f1 f" b) R and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is2 L8 s( m, K* h! {+ z+ l* w harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are* C+ c/ F) J# ^5 R2 A3 d descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 6 f, H/ G/ R9 y: s) v, nforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I " U. ^; t V! ?was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great $ C) A$ e: |& j" Q4 Kimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,+ j: g* E% n* n and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong; I7 r( A5 |: z has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment % Q, Q. B# ]9 @, Z3 Y/ h- q( Iof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that3 H) X% q8 a$ B no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ( @- {# I6 ~3 eonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a, i- Z2 q% U2 E: V a5 z! K sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 4 E: h& i+ F- d( h' ?1 j' ^want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move% J' x4 ?% ~0 F3 j O- H& k to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is) _5 _. N4 x7 P! W% ^ "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,. L, c. O6 i9 V. S+ p this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are7 j( C1 Z% M3 ~; W6 r5 G9 ^ still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to+ T2 K; R# M( z# k! S "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make. Y3 @, K$ l5 W$ @" H Y. S money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was % a% p+ _- V& F: G# Sa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a" L5 ?9 J- w5 _! b: s3 d0 E% z parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across' L. l4 _# N$ @8 m9 [8 e1 c the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 3 I- N4 s( I" Simportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 3 v8 u' B% f1 s) J+ Y8 Edevelopment.

Hutongs 2 F' D% U% s' n" R3 x1 bin the old days were residential area where people actually lived( o! C$ d* ]3 p2 j there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions) q/ |' m: ]4 h" r5 [. \& r* L* Q in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not , Q' W: N. P, X5 r( Ohave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you8 Z+ h1 l4 g+ _- s( K- M will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 8 r5 Y X+ i% P: H, V ^Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 4 I( S W2 q& h6 o5 C$ |to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 9 T R, A; z+ y% _7 ^6 `9 X$ Q/ A$ |to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses4 H D9 ^" S' g* c support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically: [+ q3 c( n+ D7 k& k8 f1 S unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 5 }# B4 F; C/ F; mlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,$ o y! H7 N: J* Q$ a$ f% D6 O hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the4 ?% |& c+ W- B- `# Z6 W balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the; J) |8 y0 t% M% R* s project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 0 }; b- r1 R1 R/ urenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong ' r1 \5 a( P4 ^& _Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how- M4 m6 `$ H/ V% [5 e$ y: M people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be. K7 ]7 E: G1 k( r. N% u! t torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 6 f8 J% \) ~, R7 x9 b: i' Ymemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". * x8 T5 K5 S* t6 I/ ]Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are + i. k1 u/ e5 D- v* r( I% ealigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially! f* R8 ^' B, o9 p* n' O' | non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image , v: o' u& I4 n8 ^3 }8 E5 ~of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these* X- R, w- {; z8 n6 B U! F Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 1 T4 b! E! t+ a( Z gpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they \7 q( _9 W7 s- `" |3 }* Emay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 0 k2 g5 c/ k6 F/ l3 Cof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before3 ]; }- ~4 E$ n6 n/ i* U2 z "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all: e7 s) l5 q# N4 C7 ^% o people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise" \" V2 l/ \" v. t- }8 j' o apartments are the way to go? No.' q% i! |1 Q+ j! c! h, P 0 m7 a+ H! A3 _0 H; T- B3 l% y3 S2 l 1 V+ C: ? u$ F8 G( g. C& b

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the . U" ?6 ^+ r8 j9 Usituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 3 [0 g3 f9 d( z3 r'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 3 M! v% j% }- d2 l+ h4 [7 qno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so* }( o9 e# q7 ?! ~' z4 R fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 2 i) K& t6 i- @2 w" S9 Presistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless " a4 `( E" Y" w: k' u& bBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 4 S2 w' ?- ]* b9 ^8 {$ x% N7 l! L$ punlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-18 15:56 , Processed in 0.119759 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部