服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6387|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 8 ]: q0 N6 l/ v- T8 h7 jarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider9 W: ]' i) H! q Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" + x! k& S3 L/ b1 |( |city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. R z/ h H; H2 ]7 I {8 J$ w- F According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 2 f7 Y% h; ?4 w4 Z2 \3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of& W% p& @7 v) m) [+ }* G2 ^' x Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within# K' _$ V0 M& Q# K; Z- j) _ hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among8 }& g" w6 [& P7 K" ?9 H/ t each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera ! {9 u; E' Z% a; Vand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 7 u: M5 W( C6 h- D! W1 K& ?: t/ vharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are6 z: t) y* ]6 S" h! K$ q( L H descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and * B& }1 {3 f$ t7 p2 ?. y& tforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I $ g5 Q2 A6 y; c7 S% Kwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great; ]# M' L# m# g# [+ m' N# O& k impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ' g% k* l* z9 a2 W9 c `/ \and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 7 }1 j q$ B5 mhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment / S2 a" B( D( f1 dof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that / g/ t) v/ Q* A- R% M: b0 x0 Cno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ) d5 d* G! F) B4 Z; Konly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a8 w5 s7 O ~( X4 {6 x, p sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government5 S1 D! z1 p+ i: t0 N want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move% j% W* T6 ` A/ G/ ^1 s2 }5 K, u to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ! ^. o: }! K$ \* o7 y2 K, c"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,' s/ o. l' T0 l3 ]: x5 P! } this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 4 I1 k5 u. w5 _" Q4 b$ M( Ustill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to' e. d, o- G/ t9 Q) i7 C "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make( L9 F5 H, |: }+ ` money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was / L$ U5 s. Z" Ca beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a' c1 c, m* m s9 y parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across7 A& s9 _% X7 v the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural # [; [) E' W- g! o0 b$ Uimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for! r& L, d2 o' q. I6 ?& | development.

Hutongs- @ G' i4 Z( ?1 G5 W y% D B in the old days were residential area where people actually lived $ e! N' N% ~) ~/ X9 [9 D( Wthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions & N: X# Q: i6 m4 U; ?in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not! t) u# e: g: t2 c) h4 ^$ r have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you' C: Y8 D9 C5 s( p: U will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 4 K- X$ d2 d t3 i. ~Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 7 D) c8 \8 O' r/ u+ F$ ]to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used- u0 X1 S9 a' h, ^% w to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 8 Z' w+ z6 G( d8 k# psupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 2 S( g9 I( \8 i& H7 Hunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to; g+ p$ ^: M! A4 ^3 a' G live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, " r( w$ z: l6 G) ehutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the) P9 R7 S% \# l$ [ balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the5 a A# z0 D8 D0 M project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be & Y7 L8 {' b5 H) c& urenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong+ i$ c0 }; |$ E, t6 ?* ]8 W9 c Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how . G- i( \' I: F' Lpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 6 T1 g4 K+ R# i) jtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 3 d/ \; I4 Z. I: k! L: gmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".0 l& H4 v: N/ `1 U7 N1 `+ y( {, Q Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are& {: P7 P5 a) x' j- r W aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially : m4 u; d; q- N4 N# D* Bnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 0 J! a) R- W+ ^- J! y0 z% Wof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these2 O. o, v) X% q2 _3 N' T9 x5 Q; z Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 4 ~! I! z4 A0 c; ]; i/ ^people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they : i, z! b& K5 ` H, q7 [# ymay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some7 B1 B) t" z+ ] R$ P+ T' Y! G of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 8 f0 i6 T$ i. a* k: e"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all $ q4 j9 m$ ^0 [people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 0 W! { B5 N# M+ u. o Uapartments are the way to go? No. . T" b+ K& }* L7 B* i # J5 w" h [) Q- L5 K 1 ^% j6 ^ O3 U2 }, T; g& J- b) C+ G

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the / P$ N6 F! `: S! Qsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this % u8 O3 r, c5 z7 A5 i'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make $ G, C' U: s0 t9 [8 f' }no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so" K5 H% _0 y6 w2 _! V$ m" v' h. ]/ v fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant: r% l: [; E( z! P; y% L resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless , X5 l; A! j' s0 m5 w: g6 t6 O# l- NBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is% H( P5 z1 U7 ?! d unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-10 09:05 , Processed in 0.134904 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部