服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6464|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ' a2 h9 B+ U! U1 L) \9 Sarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider! z" E! B! n' T6 n. l- A _. r6 U( Z Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"! \7 e2 w* n6 e: l+ v8 z' q city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. / w& Y# q6 B7 n8 F# AAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 8 D/ d3 ~: w/ A: y9 T' S3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of- C: T9 ~: J) c, \3 W Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 4 e) s5 Z) Y1 M/ b" d9 C( @2 Bhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ' {; w' g& q; x3 n# [; keach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera) i; C( a& {2 k. T+ E and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is% y0 b. V" n% }" h. K harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ) V8 Y3 L/ }; ~; Z# adescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and. M( l$ c% u9 s( e8 W' F% V7 O7 v$ P forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I {( G2 x, o% |4 @4 xwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great" b. ^8 D* x. _" W. b- x* L impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 3 V/ Z' w {! C2 Z6 ?and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 7 m* b% }- S! E. }# t- w" Nhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment * E- T# E! d9 g6 z1 bof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that ! L- X% o0 I/ u2 jno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 1 T( {! r0 ~! j B- C" t) aonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a . P; t; k. L' \; n) x6 E6 e6 z( A1 Tsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government6 c4 T0 h7 y( o" p# C want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 3 G, O& A1 y( N0 v5 y& [8 h, q8 Vto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is' R: z8 e9 i* U# }; [8 _( \5 I0 a) n "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, F% u W: \9 A. z5 R+ \$ c" Sthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are7 \2 A5 _+ Y" Y* O still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to3 C2 @0 q$ F; e j! \4 K: o% t "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make+ U- L) D* q! A money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was7 _! Y& ]3 w! I a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 7 J$ v, m! m' Jparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across. L$ k3 i% s# A+ I: F the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural4 W1 m3 [( t ~7 _3 i$ q importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for# Q: x& x# I0 x& O( } Q development.

Hutongs . t! f. [ b! y$ k0 F2 Sin the old days were residential area where people actually lived v7 r8 y% D! ~' k7 pthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions % _4 I& l9 T5 p& D& Sin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not) n s8 j, l7 W. ]1 P have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you5 J d2 y6 J$ H4 O will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.$ j% c& N2 v5 ]% u3 _9 e8 e Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date $ e; W# `) x6 ^/ p; kto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used+ t& _6 `* U. g5 a3 U* Q to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 6 I. q3 K. o2 D& ssupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically8 x7 T- }. J! V$ N6 s unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to % b" p3 a8 s* q* ^live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, B3 ^6 A% n" j' f, u+ a hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the ; G# j9 l2 K" \* l" q: fbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the2 D$ R' b8 H$ p; i# K6 V project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be- L8 W; ~) x3 E( h0 o) R renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong- ~0 m7 U; ~) A Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how ' Z0 E2 U- r5 e2 J: {4 lpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be$ x' ~$ \8 u2 r9 w# ~ torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished # g! k8 F$ z/ h0 V0 umemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". ( l+ f! l% g: i7 xNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ' Y7 ]* Z2 ^9 a; z0 laligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially( q! K8 j) N. @ non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 7 Q8 A5 S. g' U- \: `3 j( H* pof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 3 J/ j- r0 z b) pHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those6 z3 y9 h* V5 Y! ?! P1 a+ Z+ \ people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 2 c8 a0 @: |- g! O* Jmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some$ `$ a& x6 D3 X( } D of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 6 T0 r2 O; Y+ p/ A1 J2 ^"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all/ Y( u5 ?1 k9 w% l people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise4 i9 x: w1 o, J, H; e8 }& l apartments are the way to go? No. . f5 x2 C2 d3 S* ~ 4 m4 D5 g$ l+ |' O & a+ Z" ?3 R! D+ Z

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 5 U; U$ E% [7 N7 O. m5 Xsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 3 F& d+ d5 c' \' U'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make ' n! D Y; {9 ~! x/ i* p2 Pno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 8 f- g- y2 \* m% C, N7 B. z: Xfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant & }/ \4 I3 P" m5 Tresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 7 [7 e" @2 O2 A5 _& SBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 8 [/ Y) E+ X: [unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-16 06:23 , Processed in 0.126305 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部