UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
# }! L4 g& G$ r, H: carchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider. {7 O1 s4 [2 e: X- X+ Y' R) W I6 e
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
1 o. U f6 j. x, I' c; u% Icity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
- S' [9 S, a5 i% z+ x7 b7 sAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
+ h" m% i. v) L3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
1 e% n7 W! A" C6 b' RManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within' G9 S% x* _% Z+ A& B7 W+ n! j: o
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
. ?3 M2 O- r2 a, Oeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera8 h8 q! W0 l. V4 a+ n7 ~8 X) }
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
& y j& r8 d5 O0 [harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are4 h. Q9 n0 @" G6 N6 |3 B
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
. n( ^# e- l8 }8 eforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I8 ^# R }- O7 m- x! ?
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great; B6 x0 R4 N* v$ }
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,7 |$ q( e* W1 l- a5 Q+ q+ k' W
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
/ a% k- U# l( k; Jhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment* Y) x7 b' E4 A# B
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
& ]0 t& L% d( P2 D8 a: jno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
2 O* p( |5 @, ~* \only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
! y1 b8 w1 w( H# c3 ysort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government% A& N/ {$ k# O) K+ D1 h/ E; x
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move0 h/ ^8 G& _3 L5 v1 O
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is+ H5 c. {' X0 g' V( ?3 m Z- l: ?+ W
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
2 L4 Y* n R% k9 q7 Fthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
; y5 l5 H e: lstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to, Q4 m s. c0 ^8 r" Q' F0 L
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
8 Z0 \6 ^, L# I# `2 Cmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was' V& E( N0 l% _
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a, \" L5 j' K7 P9 m8 K
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across% k' D* L9 \5 u: L0 N
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural7 O0 o5 N$ b5 b. b
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
2 u) {" G) R0 ~3 o S; \* F/ [development.
Hutongs5 T+ U; |8 F. A0 c' [* {0 A
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
5 T, z% ]6 P0 g L$ {8 T8 jthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
5 j" h6 Q$ ^0 U$ B% G4 s# Gin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not8 ?# ?1 G p, w$ x' A8 x {
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
( I; H$ {/ R' T' ^will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.$ C2 }; e$ h) }. R, x6 C- P: r! r
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
7 m' l8 d9 s2 Y" J2 [0 F$ `to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
0 J" e5 g* C/ m& W8 o' @3 ito hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
# g; C! D. F. _. X( p4 ^0 ^+ D' Wsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically. x: j. q8 c( I% p
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
9 M9 R) |9 B0 _$ V" clive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
% s3 t4 T; ?/ Q) {: R4 x) zhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
I k* b# S c0 E/ b6 k9 Jbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
0 u- w+ E( l% f: v {, Gproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
8 V+ h; ]* M, k# srenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong. d( }% @# E, {3 |$ d( R- {
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how) ?" Z! K7 R3 Q+ m
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
: M( _ n6 A: x8 S; H5 htorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
( p: u( R+ [" k6 hmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
) e; p b/ p8 P1 }Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are$ c" s+ @# ]% l' O6 r/ h
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
; P4 Q, \& q2 Pnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image) X) h( C2 c' a7 s' L
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these9 x- F8 G( X w" l6 n: M t
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
9 J+ z% }+ O& T5 @5 [people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they6 I4 Q$ @( W# n9 C8 @' h
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
# |. h N/ U2 a: N; u5 V7 Bof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before' P! F: ?% Q d. p) j1 x- T2 G
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all0 ~) N. d6 c" W. A2 X% p
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise1 Y& e' A; \2 D( N) y! `( N
apartments are the way to go? No.
3 q" f. {5 n' o% b+ g. d $ d" T4 f. p0 \/ `; `
, n3 |, x( D4 j1 r5 [1 f F
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
' t) s/ }( X7 ?* Csituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
O& O9 s I9 U4 `: ]9 c$ C'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
/ j! K* N% c7 [1 n6 r) {0 Bno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so7 p7 G& _ w! A# @
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant1 z P4 G( i9 S' g: m
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
; {& A& h# @5 D4 cBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
$ c" w: T( J- C, X8 W0 d( Q% ~) w) hunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|