UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its" g0 ^) F- U9 Y$ t
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
}3 ^3 t$ W+ I# @, [Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
; a8 m" \# U% acity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
: h" f$ E: T2 |0 QAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,8 x9 h! v1 P* P
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
7 g0 P- z3 x( k+ N m7 Y- yManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within7 J* u1 v6 _4 m6 G
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
1 s& d) z- H3 C6 eeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera0 D. n% `. z {* w
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
1 ^1 e5 \6 e1 S& ~9 j8 a4 b. Zharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
( q& d! v9 }# Idescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
P8 C4 b7 y* xforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
- b- h( o {* Mwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
$ c" F6 S( [0 @( ], B$ O: fimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,' S* m3 l) |3 n7 f( g
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong) |& Q/ f. B# Y- w
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
3 f! O4 d0 v2 I4 O9 @1 vof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that$ Q) M" u; p1 I+ [1 v
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
1 s- J+ x( m- _only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
7 H$ F( e7 [! Jsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
" h( T+ x D) {7 e( m }want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
% O, N( q/ l( o, @to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
7 E! n" a6 \3 p+ f8 ^4 r) d"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
; n9 G! O, @ f$ M9 Athis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
/ {9 n' w4 W3 Z. }% sstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
" a% i& I4 O& {) x4 q"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make/ L7 L# E' @! e- e8 }
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
5 U. a+ p+ b) U3 a% n. D8 u4 H0 va beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
; d+ r$ e' Y. `' c$ Vparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across" q$ ]; E: |2 F' r( P7 G
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
0 R3 p+ b# j8 w4 _, h0 Gimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
7 @* ~- j2 b v9 J7 q1 }development.
Hutongs/ Y' n. J7 z" E+ D: {6 K/ m( g
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived. b5 {" Q, |( a9 x
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
5 L1 F" P9 a( P' P: t6 [3 Q: Z4 [in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
: f. g& ^: e- H4 m- {2 Ihave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
' q/ v0 E: P+ h$ f) F* I f/ N. G Zwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.. e4 O. J+ d' m" U
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date/ S! _/ z/ Q' g
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used) ]" i5 e; m3 I' A/ s! U
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses# K1 [, }6 W: B
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically6 X* i) T7 z+ t4 H: e( I: |5 a/ _
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to6 T: O8 u3 f E* l x
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,. Z! j0 S) ~3 f. o3 q5 @
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the+ d8 ^, d* M6 p! P
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the! ^" `0 e) G/ [; J8 Q h' l
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be- F) r2 s a/ }( z! h+ V
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong+ ~0 R5 {. u3 m
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how" A- l2 e4 s5 t% \$ }
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
) n/ l- _- j) L& B) Dtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished' @+ S6 h: ~( l3 d
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
7 ~# l B# @( O9 t* A& W/ MNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
. c, q. f5 A& j+ waligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially p& ]6 T4 Z; Q7 K& L2 ^7 V( F
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image5 i/ G @3 ~7 |. g8 |; s
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these) |9 k( X, [# _
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
6 M5 |9 Y) ~( ~+ G9 J# L9 I) b/ Rpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
* J8 R* O8 z+ c4 L# I* x3 imay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
0 n& g9 \" G1 O6 b8 V, B! o$ F9 ]+ nof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
! {' H/ I1 J0 x: k6 v( J" i0 K8 l"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
" B7 P [( S9 n* }$ Hpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise- @: I" [# ]) D d0 X7 O
apartments are the way to go? No.: ~1 W! y7 C# E: s! U8 a
+ |, z- E7 c' m1 Y, Q . j; V1 d0 B+ L& T# g9 k
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the; H8 ^9 B; W) D
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
2 F8 X3 x) B) z% I'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
% x" H" V7 C0 F2 q% tno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so) w1 I0 Z6 a' i7 f6 R/ q; k2 E
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant5 A |1 C5 b! j ?6 Q
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless) C+ O% A, D9 r' ^( S
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is, G9 W5 p/ j, H5 k7 z' u
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|