服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6684|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 3 c0 M2 R/ N" q5 ]0 b9 Narchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider4 `% c# t2 u. b- K% {% R& E Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian". Y' W% a6 q8 s( V1 O5 U8 V city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.* ^+ p6 a% }* ^1 P According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,4 l/ Z6 Z9 ]& _: U 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of . o4 t& F+ \2 pManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within+ w" M$ U% }# B' |5 h8 G( u hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ; _7 \& G/ J+ v6 Eeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera$ u, ~, a1 e" |0 H. S8 [! B4 n: K and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is& g" F- L( A- J! Q2 l harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are2 \% o& J* R3 q0 R descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and8 T# e% ]1 k0 n+ ~- f! p7 b forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I5 ?3 S2 ]2 P9 H6 r: `- l2 H& ]1 q was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great + h8 z* _: S/ S i& O* Bimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,# |# X$ E# @2 q4 \' O9 G and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong / F) R6 }' |4 nhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment / u1 A7 E$ h. T4 Qof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that $ X8 w% t8 W. m; s. w3 d h" fno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are7 W8 n* N* O3 U, Z a- [1 U# G only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a% C. L5 F3 q9 ^- ]8 @- s sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government $ d7 _- M! F8 k. zwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move / L) L* h$ |( ]7 S( cto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ' v' z/ u5 O9 ~" s( G1 y- B. [" O"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,9 {' o7 S, k7 _4 C this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are( r7 Z5 y) c* {' l; j still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 5 R1 K5 D7 M% v+ }"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 3 \ S: s9 P6 Z: P) @+ q& [money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was! ^# g: r1 z& a+ z1 F: F a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a , d. W+ l8 U V2 F# yparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across e( T- ~) u% _/ y0 U& s# Othe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural9 e" y+ o* i7 q+ k( r6 g importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for; F- m" M* _6 b* F1 V* {' j development.

Hutongs% i6 m' T+ X) i" o4 v in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 2 @: c% J0 p. `& C; `there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions # _1 n: A* v. F2 f4 m; m; _in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not i, L l. ]+ |. y' M: B( `have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you: }0 N" v" b0 w will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.. X# Z4 t- O( ], S* X Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date \( p3 M- _, G5 L( D to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used1 J* \$ e* W% W* m! @ to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses" N' z3 T# m# C support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically" E+ k( O; ~- \9 V+ t unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ! `! ^8 D( g, G+ vlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,& [2 T0 I) `% m hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 3 H/ d3 F1 f% J, Q0 }% X9 jbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the! L. [5 ]( Z" _$ } project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be4 l- y/ N6 P& t' ~ renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong & k+ l# [0 V* L. f6 ~; q% B6 }) U! kMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how9 f6 X) m- C0 { people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be4 d4 j9 d& J& t& |9 H" e torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished : k0 g. V# b1 {; \memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".* i5 c+ ]0 {9 o2 i Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are- x6 v: |9 ^$ L/ R aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially - S, A3 |' _+ i+ anon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image E0 N* a' U+ P/ Z$ r5 Y of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these* @! p) `2 Q* s5 I9 e& s7 t9 ` Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those r: b$ T2 ]3 v people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they , g. r5 [# o! y& m; ^0 I' R6 Fmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some * @$ C$ X6 i& X5 g- b8 jof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before( y- j6 d* ^1 a; A' c& c0 z) {2 t "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all+ ]3 y% m' r5 s9 {3 h; y: o& Q people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise/ `0 L. n$ u( }3 F9 b4 D; T* S apartments are the way to go? No.4 i) i: z4 Y! B2 I- g4 X1 D ! g k) v- k: E0 e1 w ' p* X/ K/ @4 z# a9 x1 f* Y

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the3 G8 r- W* }" I) p0 \0 W situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this; m" P H( t0 Y0 [0 a, Q) V$ ? 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make + q) p* d8 W+ J; ~/ hno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so $ r4 S C0 @ B! Yfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ; e7 X( |. ^* G+ Y1 w! [* p9 Rresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless * K, K [* w4 f9 e6 M" P# D! a% O) iBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is- H. ^4 M% S- p7 ?% u unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-9 22:03 , Processed in 0.139163 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部