UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its& S6 ?7 Q# v# e, s4 w
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider6 U6 ^- [% ? b- S5 e
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"4 m4 b e2 |, f/ ^
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.- T* b; `& p! R9 y* c
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
e+ f# G5 ]- |2 @& h3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
9 J+ ?$ B( L r7 P$ l1 k5 VManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within+ [1 S( X) k8 v6 q/ p
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
& t% {1 E4 q/ ]1 N3 C6 x. keach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
& j/ K" a5 D0 @2 X8 J/ k* i' Gand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is4 l6 c ]: t) C# f5 x7 l2 I
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are& w/ B+ z( T2 d" U V
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and$ I* i8 |) S4 M7 U$ f
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
$ Y- |( Q+ H$ v8 R/ g) Q- rwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great/ f1 c: v% t$ B. b
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,1 o: s7 n% z* K% W
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong: Q+ b0 l, ?$ ^6 H1 I/ t
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment& o, p+ @5 E% B! S
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
# {. D" v* `' L& y8 i& bno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
" c* x0 G& ]- Bonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a! V/ [2 e1 e5 v9 x
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
" o- C: x5 D7 cwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
+ O! D! h& v& p4 bto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is0 }& S! E( G# N7 a
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
( m1 e4 j& p4 f3 Q% |3 ~) E$ b& dthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
- ~7 o1 w2 v" c1 U1 ^still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
7 I) g7 N. X& E( }/ z"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make/ {, k6 T" c# e9 M: X! @
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
/ b. j8 ~% P5 L# C, M! [, V; Ga beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a! v! N) f1 {7 R+ T
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across. P7 {( n1 ~8 n
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural2 b1 R, o. `$ _
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for! D( N0 \+ U6 K1 I3 s; b
development.
Hutongs* e& P. d+ c/ H0 r
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived/ ^, M1 u" V) q X# i' T0 F
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions- u/ H; }1 E0 a4 D0 F
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
/ a0 n4 p# ^: R. W3 Rhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
' i9 Y2 e3 ^' }0 B6 ]' I/ m% awill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
" G4 Y& a6 A8 _$ h0 ^1 c) yFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
- h9 e6 }1 O) ^1 |* O5 [to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used& T- P/ G* P7 e0 M9 q6 ~
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses, x( d5 y1 H- R0 e
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
# ^6 S$ E% N# `$ p9 M+ i4 \unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to9 ^ Y7 r5 W8 j
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
6 S1 \0 w4 y' U: Q; X4 O3 qhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the4 |" k7 A7 v/ V
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
( C1 @' Z9 m. J7 |# Aproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
" O+ q* [3 w/ i8 {% n" t: \8 w3 Wrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong2 M( K9 Y. |4 }7 O
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
3 I: m" J4 |) L. i9 F5 l6 qpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be) C* Z3 ^" `1 @/ X/ @: E+ h
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
6 s- B, D, }/ t wmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".5 Z+ V6 u% {' y0 ^" ~ \: S
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are* X- [+ m4 q8 A. t/ z
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
* a2 T, m4 E. y5 a# b* n) w( @non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image) S' w$ r1 Q7 C/ [0 {
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these2 ` c2 f# ]8 c x9 H2 X1 V
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
x: |. p0 D; a6 fpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
( U8 I* ]1 K9 g% e' Xmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
+ V' `* \# j% e2 N8 c. s4 b9 Qof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
) b8 @/ {9 U& z"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all1 E; ?* `# t h$ l p
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise8 n% ]# i- A: f$ F/ E3 C4 M
apartments are the way to go? No.2 B0 Z4 W0 ^- g2 ^5 s# a2 M
; D% |8 ?$ I4 }6 M
0 s" R9 H* G3 ]9 v
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the. K( G. N# ^+ E4 G: P8 J
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
7 q# V4 [( ]4 b' [, T'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
. U. \! h8 H$ Lno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
$ o, f; f+ |+ _. kfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
8 K0 M$ p' V, v% o* E1 fresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless2 l/ M: ~4 H7 ^( B, a+ V" H, w1 Z
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is& l* v; ?, @; G, H0 ?/ h; a
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|