UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
5 |' G8 z" j0 Y; r7 ?3 U) carchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
v( w! S! ]7 L1 U: s. q3 g! |Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"! S8 ?$ L0 X% Y- M& g5 ~0 ?$ W6 q& e
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.7 @ g) y) M, p0 r/ t8 H0 J+ E% Z' {# x
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,# ] X$ ?/ a6 O- j' G% S( t
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
) V2 V# S; S# G2 H& C' b2 wManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within9 D" M v/ l$ w6 L! R8 P
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
9 \" F2 h @! l& f3 Z2 n5 h3 z+ Oeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
7 N6 O& ]. B2 A7 O9 y8 I* T6 dand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
* p# T8 }, _! g9 m; ~5 vharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are: f, ^ Q- X9 o, g( \
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
- n* L5 W' r* jforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
?8 \9 e5 L" V" lwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
7 y4 @% F: R4 ]. himpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,. \/ s* Z2 h# g" |5 y/ X9 A" S
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
* @! b$ |# l3 |5 C' t8 Shas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
7 e* w" _" \. \5 r% oof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that/ F& i7 B! R5 _( @6 z" X! T* p
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
$ K, \; V. e. P+ p. n6 Conly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a7 l7 E: [) I$ t* F4 F
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
& j; O, p7 R8 f X7 @" F" |: d, Rwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move+ C0 O( x. M, G. e+ D. T
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
& h9 {) \+ H, u6 X3 Y"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
0 f% {1 y/ k$ v; J( M7 w0 gthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are5 Q. C: f$ q4 F: F2 I' k6 v% P
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
8 S* @4 Q P: z- w/ @"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
5 z$ T( _& w9 U# Omoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was) g G- _) d9 U0 l/ y- M. V4 X
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
% ^6 J4 D1 ^0 q( d# d6 Sparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across, [& E) T" B o5 V" [
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
, K, f' l/ g5 z$ }, rimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
( Z- D( ^; A" o B( kdevelopment.
Hutongs2 |8 H+ k1 A6 J' `
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived% m% b% G: E7 H8 v
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions$ w) Z4 D4 U9 h8 O! I( h* ~- |
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
; y1 T" X6 Q" I6 {4 ^0 Lhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
* D& [7 t0 ], }4 R, Wwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
) L7 R! N; K5 |) u) y2 t) Y- F [# KFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
! W1 i R# S2 m, |, h' B! rto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used* [! e2 _- M% _2 |2 x
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
; U9 g7 T2 @1 ]( jsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically2 `$ {: x* V% `6 E+ K
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
+ f, _- B h' {9 o# J) O0 @live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,3 R1 A! T# a1 \" y7 F8 i
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
) p' h+ p5 z. L- m5 l" \$ @! Rbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the4 B& M/ \8 N: g) `5 a5 W% _, x
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
, _& [& f# J) xrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong% @( E3 |+ T0 Q( c& H3 U
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how7 J* G0 Z: i' ?
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
! i! a# z. L6 |6 P2 ~# itorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
9 b- t4 s. s \; p+ H9 i* ]memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
4 Z# ~- R& z* T* q# MNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
8 W1 ]4 d) ^+ N5 h aaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially7 e1 m& \* x5 D; S3 U" N
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
3 r9 L2 n! r: z: {of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these9 R* v5 J, z# @3 n+ L9 a5 t( p
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those7 g' N5 \7 S, t( a! X
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
9 Z' Q+ k5 a# p+ a! \may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
0 C( O+ j) M# {" {$ r K+ B1 J+ h$ Aof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before% O% Q4 J4 F" v; J0 ~& y
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
1 J& y7 y1 Q+ ypeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
4 e Q7 u( Z$ ~+ s6 Dapartments are the way to go? No.
" Z% C2 e1 g/ C' Y+ ]/ n$ p 6 y5 P/ { ~% u
# \6 x- u" }; o a/ j. U- p+ n
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
. o* P R' C, W5 lsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this5 p! P' H% s$ v! s8 e
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make& Y. O: q5 S' C* ~9 c& ~
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so5 F2 E2 F2 Z2 e. F- O/ [3 y
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant5 D; x$ }. \$ D; a; H. C, K
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless. r. N+ P }0 h$ r. m' w0 v% ~; `5 b
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is# D0 Y8 @7 e9 O" C' C& |* V
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|