服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6787|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 3 a+ E( |1 K+ p# X; P5 parchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider , ]: j" l/ L2 F$ A! ?+ JBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"; H" l* ] O' B, q city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.- f) P% {# I2 v, J$ D According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, % R0 d' k7 T" `% P7 [( E7 Z3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of2 p. B; q! `1 h0 }, D Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 2 Q4 x9 [1 c) O5 ?1 _! }0 M9 Chutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among! c& w3 i% S P! Q5 r5 ?; Q each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera3 ?$ T( K9 a- K/ x and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is `9 ?7 d, [7 h6 G! W8 @( z v7 { harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are " a9 g2 H" t. U8 U% rdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and : v2 g, `6 {5 ~7 |* Z9 Xforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I3 A' C: T7 n( y6 w R M' G" z7 { was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great $ s8 O6 S4 ~" uimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, * r4 g& K! d P, W4 sand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 6 D [/ ]1 j& E. s" l# ^- \& X3 _has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment9 t; K* x9 Q4 C( Z of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that + _* N3 ~* \2 H \, d* c& pno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are) v+ s! K4 q6 M0 ~. X' m. O# n only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 8 |0 q* n; [* a2 W" A. e8 y% n. psort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government& c- K( l! q, _) L) Q6 R0 ] want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move % Q8 n4 ]! [0 x3 Pto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is& X* ], D' {8 h "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 6 v# g8 T' g1 o ^: ]this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are5 E9 l3 q0 a$ p* }8 a2 b. v still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to * a; B$ y. {' G2 u3 O"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make- k4 Y8 _2 j" J5 M7 M d money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was $ ?% s% L8 J4 Q( V9 Aa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 5 |5 a9 F1 x* R7 E9 Lparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across& Z5 z& P# l0 t; x1 ~. | the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural4 q5 g/ |) x3 K r& Z5 I importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for) O& p: ^4 Z6 D. z development.

Hutongs/ }( e+ }. R1 E: {+ l: n5 F in the old days were residential area where people actually lived2 W5 ]- k- P+ { there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions / y m1 C& U8 a. \; \6 X. `% fin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ) q$ r5 \1 F- s# @6 Zhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you x0 i% U: c5 k& dwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.8 [& y+ h/ I2 d- S {% |% {1 ` Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date, e$ C- r) x/ g7 K% z- ?, h9 S to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 2 C8 R+ t! T9 [. N! p9 Bto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses* I; l/ U, e) Q, G support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically6 h* I, N6 ?6 e7 x5 x unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to, H% l" n" C2 E+ R' s2 H live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,6 s) ^( v9 K! t- p- d hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the0 C, g0 y4 i% J5 O H7 d7 q balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the3 z1 z$ ]7 ?8 r5 U @) z0 s9 D project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be # m) T3 M7 G( p9 brenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong5 k1 @( F4 G `& B Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how) i3 w3 P: I8 P' n6 F people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 7 r: U* i! {0 s9 o2 b4 l( Ytorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished " |( ~+ H! O2 e8 `* K5 Wmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".; I1 V, s. \ I; X& }, b Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are' C0 V# B. `, T2 E5 P+ X aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 9 o$ y, ], N+ m8 ]3 Enon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image ( L I) y! k f+ w- g( |of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 4 F, P& Z+ U9 T9 gHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those * C$ `% j5 [+ G" R4 \, b9 Ipeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they - ]0 j2 @- Y2 r& c+ Cmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some9 b' S! ^* D8 a of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before$ p' |8 A* H5 b4 J" I "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all. V. S( {7 S9 R4 {# d9 h- M' C# B people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise - f5 f, r* q" M Napartments are the way to go? No. * j. w7 y2 [! ?4 f7 s+ f% J% G$ W 3 y+ a% s( D( o N 4 P2 b% k# V1 Z/ g% x) I

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the& n) [7 L0 k5 l- s+ y; Z7 N situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this# G$ ]9 U: g- p: d 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make* \. J7 w4 e8 L% @( N no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so: K$ h: W( X. b, E: u fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant) w0 R7 X: O4 y" k/ v3 v1 j resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless0 h2 p* K) D5 g8 U Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is' a4 {9 O6 j3 W* h$ k unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-20 21:36 , Processed in 1.617003 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部