|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 5849|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its $ q0 ^/ X2 E5 f3 jarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider. v( F- s ~# D/ B. v: G3 g4 Y- Y Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" L- ^, h) R X% p# }+ Ccity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 4 y- F/ z4 O5 `5 v; `1 \7 N* M# {According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,6 q" G# S: f$ Q; ~! { 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of & X" g9 k; N- b0 M7 u7 {3 ~9 oManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within0 _- A! }' }1 V k$ z hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among & P$ T0 b$ o# r! a9 Aeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera ( i8 m. i& ~0 t8 u4 a6 O1 rand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is ; V; ^/ E; o, m, zharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are8 _ a; x- \ ^ descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and( e+ ?7 p9 }! V1 c3 Y6 q6 V0 J+ A forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 6 M1 H: `, C" J5 g9 e1 Mwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great # A8 E& [* V$ Qimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, $ e( F v. |8 @. y2 ^; ]and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong . d8 `8 R. z! b) s/ i, a. _6 R- yhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment. j" x% H5 S1 k; p4 n+ u5 H of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that7 f" E% Y; \1 J7 N6 J" Y' W- D no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are% W5 Z; L; n" g only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a + F; L' f( [: Vsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government ; ~2 N% \1 k, N9 c: Xwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move" e" o8 ` e8 E4 i8 D- l to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is! n& w+ J& t% Y3 }4 h% _& J' L "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,. Z- A( X+ h/ `& e1 { this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are & i3 ?8 j# w; Sstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 2 i% B8 Z, c/ T( ?9 ]( s"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make- H. [! n# m o9 R/ ~6 T money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was7 g) ~+ k: G. E a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a & {+ ?' C. B8 R5 V9 j( |) I1 Zparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across/ ?( N8 R" Q8 K9 a9 d the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural . A* F( G# @ e+ B' ?! W/ [2 i- o+ Qimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 4 ]9 J2 m, [1 y) Zdevelopment.

Hutongs 5 b1 d; q0 P+ a& j' c) V( U5 Nin the old days were residential area where people actually lived& f: b( d# S3 l9 s; F5 p' q there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions ) O, s8 f k8 F5 \8 l( nin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not! b; y) U8 g7 d" V( r3 Y have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you * z/ W" ?! x( }+ w5 ywill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. - t" ^2 w# s ^9 T: x& y* RFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date % I& r. b$ v) X% b* Hto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used + l. c# e5 Y3 S; [to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses) n5 K2 U$ V$ I5 S7 Q support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically9 g) Y2 D4 L _4 L unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 2 o% p6 p3 r/ llive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 2 S8 G8 O) K5 X khutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the: U/ f8 O9 k* U9 k5 C9 L6 u balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 6 S7 x$ h2 `+ s( Y6 _' Oproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be3 F5 \& a4 H: W: c renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong % \2 A/ Y. Q1 xMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how$ F7 s G% q5 |6 b: D2 Q people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be , w& I3 g( s; ?+ l: ]& P1 T% x- H$ @torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished : }2 y# i$ }- D! k* Amemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".% G5 z7 p/ b8 `0 Z' v6 H. q Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are. ]2 S+ ]( V1 ]2 Z/ L5 D aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially# I9 b$ z) `: W: ~" L4 U non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image . X' W+ ]# n4 gof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these $ }. X7 F/ G ?% h" i8 q1 ~Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those0 ^% F! d- V6 j people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 2 \; u6 f2 G9 B0 Nmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 9 a$ w& _- a8 Q9 m4 Wof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before# a; T. D! |7 K& h "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all5 Z; g& a" O! ]4 D people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise ; L* G' H0 D( m! g4 e; Z( l: m* ]% Capartments are the way to go? No. - ~7 V% e# J. P @, \ 1 B; S. N7 Y8 C! u( W( \/ p . u% ?( H0 n2 y

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the. o* z* S: n" y1 ^- [4 A! h situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ) h) G- P- D, Q7 S9 o'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make ( H7 |& k" ]$ Z6 D3 e# w. Q" Gno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so$ y$ b. x' v; @ fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant% b' h2 y6 [& } resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless * x+ a1 l( x7 bBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 5 ?+ S* f/ k; `) E G3 }unlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-3-10 15:50 , Processed in 1.171184 second(s), 6 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部