服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6369|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its * `" U \) ~9 B$ s" [architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 9 V: e; l" Y& V. T* J+ rBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"0 \0 z0 y- X; n, c) X city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. , b" }6 @0 U6 u, V2 W* a+ yAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ' q8 \& R) Z5 @9 g3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of % H9 P, P+ D/ ]% r8 M RManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within9 B0 M( |& O9 V6 {) f" ] hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ! I; u' B5 ~$ M1 t* ~1 d% U' deach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera& l: G# Z" |* [/ {( j, F! \/ z and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is! ^6 J. [& C+ t( N( g& q harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are) N! _, x# H4 Z9 C7 o descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and# ~$ `: M6 T/ L! G2 B1 i2 g& k4 F- j forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ; l; {. J( S! f$ g6 D0 owas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great% q0 f7 ?2 C' b2 u) G impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 0 q, o1 E* P+ W- N" D2 Aand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong : b4 X; E! |6 a# B, s9 r. a+ T- V2 ihas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment7 G: c( B$ O% }; V$ Y6 m' M1 K% Z$ ` of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that , ]" R9 Y0 f: X' B/ V n# s% Uno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 8 d h0 t9 [# E0 l: I! t- Zonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 1 w- n+ `$ k9 d C6 z, I' ]sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government ) i; `- v5 Q' o+ E4 awant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move3 j6 M- e* A, ^' A$ x: j/ u$ I to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ) I6 G' _# |0 O"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 4 S) u: h, w) P( Ithis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are3 z0 z9 ^2 B: _' |( E! _ still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ' G7 Z4 {3 m: e"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make: M Q' Y. t/ |" x0 j$ M money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was6 V1 q/ @1 c1 N8 p `# H3 m a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a , E3 p6 F9 K& f/ {parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across |# l: s4 T' Vthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ; z% V+ l' ]) J$ gimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 5 R4 f& u9 C9 |: g- o: z6 wdevelopment.

Hutongs! b6 }$ T5 B5 Q in the old days were residential area where people actually lived ( ?: f& }+ _+ E6 o6 f7 ?there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 4 e! H5 Y1 L% s& w0 @+ z2 v) ^- F* jin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not + j8 g+ R+ r3 o8 `) \% @have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you / P+ }8 X: \1 a3 R% Mwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.: `; Q/ l7 o/ N& \- z) z Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date - ?: d6 V; p) R/ r! O6 zto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used8 \. p, |& ~! V. W/ W7 T6 H to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ) E E2 z. h( ksupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically- H0 ]4 \* L5 l( A$ S( e unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to8 B X' a: }- P- Y live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 2 R6 y/ \9 T( j9 Mhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the6 B H- V- y# E( O2 M { balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the & s: x m5 u" \& f jproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be1 ?1 n$ q" S1 f9 d2 |; @( d8 E renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong / r& I+ `5 c" d; {5 T! JMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how8 C' I% v Y7 g' n2 t people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be ! E$ `3 [" f. b6 w2 ]torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished4 Y; G* m8 D& Z( m memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". / {6 D1 }4 h( }* o0 s7 MNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are, M b4 m2 W9 b$ H7 ? aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially ) G- q9 S8 {4 E$ enon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image& L4 R" L1 n4 J) U5 @ of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these, C3 k$ I8 F- J8 Q& c Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those ' @( n' t& b( {7 s. M- x4 hpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they H! {; p7 Z6 R: C may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ; D' W7 q2 B1 uof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 8 t$ d9 Q3 Z0 _) V- ^% f: l"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all " n# }) |- O; T/ R/ ^people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise, G4 ^3 n2 f( N0 Q, {0 q apartments are the way to go? No. 8 h2 ~2 I/ {, {# t& {/ y % E! m1 Z7 N( ~! H; E. g. @ - q4 A' E6 R4 i3 |2 x& |" g" O0 A

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the @* c! F2 O' q: `6 _ situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ( n) o M2 x3 n0 Z0 h'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make % p6 u1 n& U* ?) Kno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so; E* G2 Y' B1 p; ~ fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant# B+ }# m, O/ R4 @+ [$ Q/ F* H resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 4 Y& w5 T! y' q( @Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is5 H. {: j. y. N* _4 k" _1 { unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-5 10:11 , Processed in 0.127311 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部