UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
- B3 p! q4 M$ I( C9 garchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
/ J" K. N5 h2 w# c; F4 @6 iBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
/ z; P- Z4 u0 B+ |# y' {1 }# A4 gcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.; Z. q6 u" `/ c( E5 z
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,( T8 E0 K" L/ B* r2 g
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of) h# z5 X0 U# j: O0 q2 w; w5 H
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
7 D/ i* X9 Z5 u whutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
( L4 O( ?* u. t- o3 {each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera( r) q0 q+ D. V
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is' {$ |! l# x1 ~
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are* W P5 C9 _7 A& t* F, c" V
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and& f. b2 N' P' O* n
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
7 h5 P( `/ s: b0 Wwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great# S- v4 s! v5 w
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
7 P' R2 I- T8 X! L* Rand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
" n2 i. F3 Y9 v3 Rhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment, p, W" F0 z! i \* h2 f/ C4 A
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that! Q) t' b1 F9 f2 F) ^7 x1 ~
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are" J0 ?& m* \( @1 j
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a8 m+ r1 Z& q% j! W
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
6 Z; h5 \! t( [8 |want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
7 R+ C0 `6 N9 Zto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is, y: A6 C) r5 @8 C
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,* `2 Z& w6 I# S, C
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are- P( C; G$ P" q/ H
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
4 B2 p0 R( ~) M- F: [- m; ^"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make, i' r: _3 N% L v! u
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
# q! ~7 u( m' H- Z, ~* ^a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
: J- b3 U$ M0 jparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
, D V* ?. z6 Kthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
; x& g. p, G( @3 b9 Q% s; Vimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
4 j! l4 R9 m1 z0 Adevelopment.
Hutongs. e5 N& S2 Q5 D+ X: W" z6 z/ L
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
J5 A' o9 U5 |/ Bthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions0 m4 Q, O! P0 }9 p, ]
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
- `. V4 g$ R5 H$ s/ p5 c+ _have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
' ?" N# [& b$ x# ]! ]4 Nwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
: V$ W y4 B: @; t5 s" k- \Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date7 z$ G' G0 D, T
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
( I7 F3 ]0 ?) r) j8 bto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
7 P: ]) j6 K L! F0 i/ C; Tsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
/ Q$ [. J4 i3 tunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to$ }* M; b1 S( B0 f! K
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
$ a# v6 U+ T0 C4 d# O1 ?1 {9 i! ~8 ihutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the" U2 C: p& E7 V/ C1 I ~
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
/ o: Y; Q& R1 ^- P' l; w" d8 Rproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be$ n! _6 i8 o4 E9 H2 g, `: |6 @
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
2 r1 y4 }0 H9 I2 K) _. jMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how; y5 k5 b/ @& ? D( c
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be# v/ l. O$ o) s* T
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished y( `# b ~8 D, a6 h5 x1 l1 X7 j B
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
- U' h3 T" c6 b+ i: W* DNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
: y; q) N& x% e5 W4 daligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially$ b. _% \+ M# U* T$ X; a* B0 y
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
6 Y9 F/ a6 D9 T& O: xof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
: ~8 C( [% G3 @7 j/ qHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those' Y9 {( f6 N( s; ~
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
" ^& D% ^7 Y, h6 C$ w$ d# Kmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
% ^% R) k- f; \) K; M8 Q4 Zof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
& s2 J% Z! @( s+ R"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all% V2 F% }/ }* ~, O
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise8 ?/ |1 q: E9 d2 E. V# p y; f
apartments are the way to go? No.
; N W5 I, c! k) {8 ]7 L- s 8 ]; t1 C& O5 [4 p0 H- P
# x4 g: l! E3 r, D- L& O
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
; L8 Q& [0 w" ~. @, V. |situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
. C8 Y' P5 U n' j) Q Z, C q* }'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make/ j3 k6 t8 u. I1 X7 U
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so$ V2 `$ C2 h8 a3 W- i( S2 k, Z
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant! `! U+ U, R2 C* v, d
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless5 _, C6 R3 s0 T" w
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
, O( w3 Y9 m6 Q# j! |unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|