UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its" P/ F8 e3 x7 Z
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider4 O/ H# x' x& ?% ^
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"7 d l# s5 v1 K H. G. C7 ^
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.1 J5 ]9 i; n( m% m* M( A+ Q
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
# S/ ?. E6 T2 ^8 V$ G2 U; C3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of8 y9 Q+ L5 X e( d
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within/ B; f) ~5 B& u$ p# B
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
/ \3 j" S! @; W3 e$ F" Teach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera8 ^4 O, V: Z$ T1 A; h+ S
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
! w1 I4 F) c3 Dharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are! q- ~' x# C$ z0 c
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
; Q) b( Z( B4 Y- W' Bforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
' ?2 b5 _/ B* Ewas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
# m5 m; ~- O/ M& Q; Zimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
- k" `2 r8 f+ |9 S: {! D. ~and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong; p7 H- W6 T0 q
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
$ K% R# x A) Z) B( {of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
$ G% j; c+ Z v( ~% Uno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
1 t) u5 b4 x: konly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a9 T$ M6 M' `. z% J" l* g5 v( p
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government7 z2 [, Y# W! _& T o C
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move4 d7 w, S. s( q3 `: T* V
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
0 S5 o$ [1 y6 z q1 w6 Z: z"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,8 j3 }% u7 K* l
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are) U3 q& X, M- m- z
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to- `4 G+ U& p9 a$ y: c5 o- y/ Z
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
4 [9 W% E! `; S6 W8 c- m: F! Pmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was/ q+ |7 w4 @ w. B2 G7 f7 c7 b
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a8 N+ n- g0 r1 f7 J B
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
6 G5 j3 y5 O/ Z2 f/ g/ x Bthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural6 D, j3 q1 M# Q
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
9 m# U2 ^: g5 L0 C6 P0 Bdevelopment.
Hutongs U: j5 g# Z# ]5 W9 o* Z% `
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
4 d) p+ r. s) Fthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
7 y) h% z+ s6 C. D! p& e+ m3 tin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
( b+ `9 R. ]" W" Q: u) f; Bhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you, S n& A0 \+ t- F6 y& g/ _
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
" q7 {) E3 ?5 @3 ?; R% P0 D9 xFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date I2 H& A& t. w1 A
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used- U/ I |1 s. q7 t$ L' v" y
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
, a1 q1 B' Z4 N x( ssupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically& B1 M* r" r# W' Y- m
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
, @* J9 ~; o N; tlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
9 I2 d3 [$ N o8 J7 q- ]hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the# k: h2 u7 Q8 G U) U1 D. ^/ M3 `- ^
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
2 F( Z7 q# Z4 Sproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be U; W" e4 E& U7 }5 S
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong: _, k5 Y: a8 N i; v
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
& w, Z5 G$ K4 C! wpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
4 M) N- O) P3 H2 I7 B Z1 Ttorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished- U8 \) u; a: t: j3 X
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
% j) ^$ f, {' Q& \. k3 qNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
% o1 c2 B5 j+ X% T b* saligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially2 Q$ Q6 O3 y' ~1 Y9 S. H, ]& M' R
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image- g- f% v! L" m9 T
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these8 T1 B. o: O& L) Q0 r& Q
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
3 n! _( j" r) \3 zpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they( J1 i! s9 _ P# x$ V$ O" a3 x8 M4 m
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
4 t+ B9 y2 r X3 c! yof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
, K( c; O" i W0 J2 Z5 j9 y"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all O( W, F& A* d8 N7 ]1 t8 o
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise$ W7 U0 t5 q% U
apartments are the way to go? No.
( G$ O* T; x7 t4 }. A! f3 e2 Z7 P $ |0 V. Y: m# f- `$ |9 L
' A- H3 J/ G4 ]& D; X
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
( u1 ^9 A6 p3 fsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
) r) l+ d; g: P1 X0 q* |1 ?" w'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
% i9 W. |7 w0 x- e3 _no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
3 b9 q% z; b# W# C8 v, Lfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
6 D1 D F* [( D4 V, f2 y: k$ F! cresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless* W7 a0 G3 V, U
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is/ l. o; ]! w& ^! y2 Z1 g1 _
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|