服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6507|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ( P$ C" i. F* m7 [ ]" g0 |! }6 `& karchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider2 S3 E+ h* Y2 l2 r Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"6 |* U1 U) s9 B, N5 v5 T, I city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 3 Q3 N3 a$ o. T3 }' Y" X" rAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,6 F+ t2 G+ ?6 H3 N, H 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of $ o" h! j4 v' D! F' Q3 XManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within3 c" o/ j9 Q5 T hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among/ o6 p2 R6 Q( u6 ~, | each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera . M" ^: L2 t" ]$ a) pand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is * X. ]1 d% _' e9 \harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are& b9 @; g8 p0 {" V! W z: i descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and - j" L; S9 j7 K* A8 eforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 3 g; T' u7 C/ O1 nwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great . ]9 s. l6 [! L. k$ H# oimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,9 o* r& {8 g1 O and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong) L" B7 r6 y6 o0 c8 t" w% }5 K has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment z3 ?7 [; F# Q: r$ Y: j% m2 @* `7 Cof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that) D: P; r% o- s2 _8 }5 W& \; j' p no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are / O L& [: Z! H* N# b4 Gonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a9 w' _0 X. t8 E A6 p) r& Y3 {0 y sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government# |) Q# D5 N& @ want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move: M! X+ k& X% S) D7 \$ \ to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is , Y4 c$ z/ P9 @& I3 i' G"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 8 r$ M/ n$ M7 L2 b2 f+ ~this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 2 Z ]0 }$ w! }. T' K% Bstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to : E8 H' R8 q: U$ P4 n"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ' F0 P4 }3 V* m: f: z0 n* F2 ]money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was& B5 O' {8 ^; j& R! }3 v& ] a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a ) O4 K2 h7 O! @$ f! t T* xparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across Q8 N8 I4 V2 f: V# F | the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural+ g; l. c. D+ T$ `" a- a7 t importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for, Z3 T! Z; o7 l/ ^* t5 ?0 O development.

Hutongs * I7 z" E D% J' B$ H Oin the old days were residential area where people actually lived 9 U! |. ^" A( o- q* x% u; t! mthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions% E# A: T$ R; g4 R in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 1 ]# h" P" e6 C7 yhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ' }* j0 t+ K0 Q+ _will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 8 j3 K! I: Z5 m# G6 Z, iFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date + p; t5 r7 p# h$ c: H3 M0 Y Eto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 6 x) b( s+ j4 z+ f( Kto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses - U5 p: {/ w% ssupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically2 a2 F* I- Z$ o7 @7 N. F2 n unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to/ W! `* j0 { w( ^9 A live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 0 {# K0 f4 Y |/ v3 nhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the* @) C: \, Y5 q+ g) K balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the1 U9 G b8 P$ l' i project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ) O$ ] k2 Y3 u) l+ P0 u8 ?; mrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong C' `8 n& b6 p) w7 K& B! c Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 6 p* U- _* Q5 W: `6 fpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be7 |- @4 K1 c3 {( s torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished / g. T( y1 d* z+ I& r4 Pmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".: m8 `8 t8 s5 Z9 ~, o Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are * I3 `4 [& l4 Q1 Zaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially' O E% D% t$ C2 S' H0 n9 e non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image1 @' Y7 ^" V" k( X of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these3 h! N; j+ D, j( P/ P Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those$ p I# a7 a9 ^# ^0 o; B1 q people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 9 M1 u M8 A( D& A8 m! @may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ( F0 a: x' }& K0 h, C/ Sof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 4 h0 ?! } b" M( q3 g0 P4 V6 p+ `"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 9 |/ E o+ L' `3 D0 {2 xpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise( I" |8 F, z) H apartments are the way to go? No.7 L4 P9 m0 y* T g8 a' O( G ! U$ t1 F" H6 _+ s% @8 W( J . M/ @3 e. Y$ D4 l, u; s' d

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the! H2 b& N4 O. s( t) B/ m1 S; r/ I situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this8 U# L# \2 u9 V1 G/ ` 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make # [) X& T- r0 J& M$ u# f5 Dno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so $ b: @" e; _2 X: ]fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant + Z6 y/ F3 v# u3 D% C( r6 H' ^6 m: eresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless" s( l2 r3 m* i0 r; A Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is % W( X8 y# g' g' t0 \) Runlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-19 07:54 , Processed in 0.120289 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部