UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its; u8 o. a5 b- L6 s
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider+ j! ]8 c, g7 M; A; I8 g" I$ Y0 G
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
% F, q+ Q6 L, i/ }3 Fcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
6 B! e+ T( o) H; L# _According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,# z6 k6 i6 x" G( @- C
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of# _2 x) t& g* s: D% A
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within+ q" W' G4 {! J8 o
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among% h$ A+ b2 X. c8 H# ^
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
3 K/ E6 \) m/ J6 B4 E) v3 j$ @and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is2 y: o4 o1 g& |( @6 \
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are4 y M* j C5 E6 v
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and" Y- P L8 R4 }: y' m+ \
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
, N+ J4 {6 i9 Z$ uwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great4 w: F" ~ C0 S; `. w6 I' C) b
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
; y% {# R4 F/ nand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong+ A- E6 n0 S4 l. F/ ?& f6 N6 @
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment+ b" X) l& K) {
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that! [& U8 o3 [$ L; A
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
* y' W' ~# a/ R+ J) Vonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a: D# z$ u! C4 D; |/ n( @
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government0 T8 \, \# \( I( t
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move1 D8 I3 S! G4 c+ n; b- Q% t
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is+ |8 ~1 W# f" I: _* }
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,$ Z3 P, I" ]3 L6 M5 ]" Z
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
9 K, F& O }: `7 }' b$ u2 g4 Vstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ?3 W2 V% P! Z
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make. [: t) s0 j) E( _) {& u
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
$ f! Q# r0 u- W$ ?. }a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a5 B* s1 z+ [& q, d* o) S
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across% a6 _. A3 o4 s
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural8 w; J% j3 q) x
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for3 g# |. s) g `# e( B
development.
Hutongs+ G! X4 `- e: n1 Z6 |6 s% C$ [
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived$ |$ G6 w7 t/ w/ }) Y! ^" _
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
0 N1 Z8 \! L4 `% tin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
$ q3 Z) G; \, P" thave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
1 ?" {. U5 R7 }1 L7 G jwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
$ e: ^. I* w" vFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date+ O% r" x0 T& w$ `
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used9 R" Z& k; I3 }( ^# m
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
0 Z, r- R1 V- b ]support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically' q, R& k; u- G F0 d* U
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
7 C% d! J. U. Q }8 }0 l. `live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,7 {5 h- K% y" c5 L& A* D
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
9 m* c& d- k4 k: l( ]1 mbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
+ ^' n# `! D1 t Tproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be# f3 A2 w. \& `
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
5 S0 g* Y8 a& L: ?Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how* R# q# y7 P T
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be' m* R6 G2 [, I: z) p; g. u h9 L7 ]+ G
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
, C3 ?2 D5 E4 r. B5 imemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
: n# d4 C. X! Y: Z6 r9 oNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
5 C& R, a3 d4 i* [9 k3 D$ k# Caligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
7 K R, ` L( \7 Z! ]non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
. r1 O. H1 V' I- n$ U% |of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
* {0 `/ P. G& n) oHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
% Q# H f$ h& ]: A; gpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
" v) T' D8 D5 `; t7 t, |0 Ymay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some' J) P- o% f, ^. |0 m% t
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
4 @5 e/ x- c+ A! @3 a1 l) ~; ~. d n"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
+ n! Q* `8 x" G/ _, s rpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise: h# S7 d2 F( v0 |+ ^
apartments are the way to go? No.' C7 u& s! R; d( U0 O
, K Q. ?; }0 z* H) j
* }& E9 l5 M8 [% g& B
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the7 ~7 }7 x L! r" s! i! E7 C
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this& a4 ?& W, T9 F& p% a
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make+ \. d) C, R- Z8 C1 F) i* a
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
- `+ n0 d/ k' `& }fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
, \4 j$ K+ [4 |' [+ Tresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
s1 n( U% `/ D6 a6 |6 r9 sBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
4 r* v, p5 \; [0 e& {6 h) Cunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|