服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6596|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 6 O( I& d( t7 Q5 c8 Oarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider u7 D$ a: u5 N& z$ U) [ Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"# I: | A& n7 k& j" ~2 h! R city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. / {' H$ R/ _ ^: g; DAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, - L+ Z, {# g& B3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of) M. |8 y+ L- }% k Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within4 J, I( R0 I+ }1 P ~ hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among1 z n. O7 A- a$ W each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 8 D0 p( d! @# a1 m; g; hand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is" T$ O& X) k- C, o harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are " ]. m3 K" g2 X8 `$ `0 kdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and( d* K; F& _% a& m# M2 h: A forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I" v& G( R1 ~- G% d- T, F was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great, p' ]+ X" G! D4 Y) t: Z impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, I* } D5 \' |; a$ K! c and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong / F& ]8 U1 F/ L" Dhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment5 R& ?9 P2 ~2 L" Y, \ of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 4 p2 _8 g5 D' Jno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are: ]. y' W' g7 e0 A) k- ] only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a $ [# S" o. U( q9 A, g% {sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 7 q5 l) _. G, b; v& m1 o9 @" `# _want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move, n: l0 f7 [9 w# B B" p$ J Z to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is . m+ y/ F Q' _"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,( C3 R* x0 l9 W8 T this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ! p: _0 B! R( H" }5 w4 @7 Hstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ! P. O4 M' a" x5 \* R$ }) G"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ) q+ D7 @3 x# d! jmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was! H- r* w7 H- c7 l a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a + @& |. r: C4 Q1 ^parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across * e, V' h# n8 y% d4 q1 ~the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural$ C/ k/ W) S' d" U importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for8 \% Q/ {- Z) l4 u0 y5 P- U development.

Hutongs( g* M9 Z$ [4 x0 l/ f/ \ in the old days were residential area where people actually lived+ a$ T7 X3 y! q J3 i( ` there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions6 C) Y$ X' k* F8 i; i4 t& H/ n in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 3 e) O X0 }& zhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you " j1 M/ V! T! `' ywill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.8 |9 S2 w, t$ j) W2 \ Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date. _6 n0 T; \0 d, H3 q to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used/ i# E4 Q6 }4 r to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses7 J; O6 @ h$ V- V+ Q5 B& w support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically2 E2 y$ w4 b: ~, u' R unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to0 W/ L( M+ ~# X( q- D* D live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,. r' D! f8 w" s% F D& W, ` hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 9 r% h, y) H( W. p; l ibalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the; y( G; g) X& D# T3 u2 D, X, d project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be7 X( R5 D4 R9 k% L3 s renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong ( h2 p1 t+ ~) gMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how% \: E- f, L U% g8 [" ?9 I; v people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be : d9 i! ^7 u5 R* vtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished# b5 L* c1 @! p memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 6 O* ?( _* Q7 r/ x. @( dNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are$ T* P8 Y& O" c1 \$ H2 E+ a' Z aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially * x" B. L' v- h- b9 Fnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image2 W4 r7 z3 h% Z9 s( x of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these* d& |! o/ m( ^ Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those ' C" n. {- M- W4 y: |4 G# [) Q4 speople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 8 o' s' U) @7 w' h8 V6 s% Wmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 7 \ Z" e" J8 E- }of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 7 B9 V7 B$ U; a! F) ["modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all6 F& G7 Z) _( R7 G; r: a" { people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 7 C1 o' Q5 W: w) p) iapartments are the way to go? No.; j7 u9 s3 |/ z$ ` * R, p3 t( W2 r$ X ( x# L% b7 s& Z

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the % R! E9 d4 e' a- Y% N5 [5 Isituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ( @- w" B) a* N8 w5 \'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make7 N" v0 L: x0 X( i no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so* u' k% h9 G+ B* L) K fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant; ?& i# o( G( {" a" a resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless5 D! W& y( R) w Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 2 H( K- l% `2 \$ Yunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-30 00:37 , Processed in 0.131818 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部