服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6224|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its; u8 o. a5 b- L6 s architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider+ j! ]8 c, g7 M; A; I8 g" I$ Y0 G Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" % F, q+ Q6 L, i/ }3 Fcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 6 B! e+ T( o) H; L# _According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,# z6 k6 i6 x" G( @- C 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of# _2 x) t& g* s: D% A Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within+ q" W' G4 {! J8 o hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among% h$ A+ b2 X. c8 H# ^ each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 3 K/ E6 \) m/ J6 B4 E) v3 j$ @and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is2 y: o4 o1 g& |( @6 \ harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are4 y M* j C5 E6 v descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and" Y- P L8 R4 }: y' m+ \ forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I , N+ J4 {6 i9 Z$ uwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great4 w: F" ~ C0 S; `. w6 I' C) b impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ; y% {# R4 F/ nand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong+ A- E6 n0 S4 l. F/ ?& f6 N6 @ has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment+ b" X) l& K) { of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that! [& U8 o3 [$ L; A no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are * y' W' ~# a/ R+ J) Vonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a: D# z$ u! C4 D; |/ n( @ sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government0 T8 \, \# \( I( t want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move1 D8 I3 S! G4 c+ n; b- Q% t to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is+ |8 ~1 W# f" I: _* } "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,$ Z3 P, I" ]3 L6 M5 ]" Z this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 9 K, F& O }: `7 }' b$ u2 g4 Vstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ?3 W2 V% P! Z "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make. [: t) s0 j) E( _) {& u money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was $ f! Q# r0 u- W$ ?. }a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a5 B* s1 z+ [& q, d* o) S parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across% a6 _. A3 o4 s the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural8 w; J% j3 q) x importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for3 g# |. s) g `# e( B development.

Hutongs+ G! X4 `- e: n1 Z6 |6 s% C$ [ in the old days were residential area where people actually lived$ |$ G6 w7 t/ w/ }) Y! ^" _ there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 0 N1 Z8 \! L4 `% tin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not $ q3 Z) G; \, P" thave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 1 ?" {. U5 R7 }1 L7 G jwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. $ e: ^. I* w" vFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date+ O% r" x0 T& w$ ` to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used9 R" Z& k; I3 }( ^# m to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 0 Z, r- R1 V- b ]support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically' q, R& k; u- G F0 d* U unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 7 C% d! J. U. Q }8 }0 l. `live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,7 {5 h- K% y" c5 L& A* D hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 9 m* c& d- k4 k: l( ]1 mbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the + ^' n# `! D1 t Tproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be# f3 A2 w. \& ` renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 5 S0 g* Y8 a& L: ?Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how* R# q# y7 P T people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be' m* R6 G2 [, I: z) p; g. u h9 L7 ]+ G torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished , C3 ?2 D5 E4 r. B5 imemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". : n# d4 C. X! Y: Z6 r9 oNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 5 C& R, a3 d4 i* [9 k3 D$ k# Caligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 7 K R, ` L( \7 Z! ]non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image . r1 O. H1 V' I- n$ U% |of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these * {0 `/ P. G& n) oHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those % Q# H f$ h& ]: A; gpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they " v) T' D8 D5 `; t7 t, |0 Ymay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some' J) P- o% f, ^. |0 m% t of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 4 @5 e/ x- c+ A! @3 a1 l) ~; ~. d n"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all + n! Q* `8 x" G/ _, s rpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise: h# S7 d2 F( v0 |+ ^ apartments are the way to go? No.' C7 u& s! R; d( U0 O , K Q. ?; }0 z* H) j * }& E9 l5 M8 [% g& B

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the7 ~7 }7 x L! r" s! i! E7 C situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this& a4 ?& W, T9 F& p% a 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make+ \. d) C, R- Z8 C1 F) i* a no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so - `+ n0 d/ k' `& }fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant , \4 j$ K+ [4 |' [+ Tresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless s1 n( U% `/ D6 a6 |6 r9 sBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 4 r* v, p5 \; [0 e& {6 h) Cunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-11-25 19:38 , Processed in 0.183414 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部