服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6561|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its- I, h. H' \5 B+ k architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider ) m+ r2 y0 U. LBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"0 E- _* Z& [2 ~5 j* y7 u5 n city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. # j' O. a' N8 t* sAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty," b" `6 X$ Q) u6 } 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of R7 t+ t; J" Y6 x6 ^4 P, z- | Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 7 o0 p: }2 I* k9 hhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 4 e" u2 }+ \, q1 u! z$ teach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera: O7 v. a! H) T P and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is # r8 X0 g# s+ h" }. F4 sharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are3 W3 K* f0 g/ k descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and " x7 h8 F5 H1 A& D1 Z/ pforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I( N9 H# L5 F0 _6 i* F ~9 t$ } was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great. }, h& }4 ?. e5 Z" v4 |* t impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,) M$ J; H9 Y- m$ \+ u and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong6 s) T$ _( ^2 g has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment/ D' H: e) ^2 |+ q9 Q: E+ G of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that : H! m& X! R+ w# f7 r% n& {no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 8 ~ d8 ]# p3 `6 ]/ q# u; S, O' }2 wonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a # ~$ Y2 ]7 E5 L$ K( ~: Dsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government ) w# _; K# P: {# n4 pwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move- L% U7 k$ G8 y5 [7 g to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is) [+ C& k' }. X3 u "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,) U. s+ G g. e1 r9 T7 v1 s2 n this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are : g! t0 h) S- m% _. p O. @8 \" l' Pstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to , `/ G2 X5 _( T, \/ i( o: g"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make" Q9 H# @+ O9 E* K* j money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was+ q/ ]2 x2 ?% c5 w a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a n3 k+ [8 A% ^1 H parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across: W, j$ Q+ `! v. G the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ! ^6 E+ ]& D1 `# \ uimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for: K: ? T& p5 H/ o& c/ c7 l& e* `5 f development.

Hutongs ; Q' A' C$ F; Z' D' |! Jin the old days were residential area where people actually lived3 v" w' N( g; o. L there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 6 i2 P3 b+ [2 Tin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not. j* _# ^$ D, W8 q8 t% J have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you Q$ n2 c- G7 A0 Z will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 2 ~7 @& S( g# t( p' [0 d& |, v! DFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 9 H2 N4 }$ x1 Q* s& _to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used9 [+ ?0 R. \: a# l5 i7 k( ^8 c to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ; {6 n7 v) C! q$ N- Gsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically + s# @: @% h+ e- `unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to5 Q. z1 D O9 x3 T7 Q live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, - E) V; l( O5 m( Z8 ]7 ~hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the2 v; @" v2 ^/ L l4 F5 G balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the/ H% }" z8 b$ @4 u- o: s2 ~ project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be" j) E* |/ @/ z5 `& o# @ renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong / [4 s+ u* P2 t" IMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 7 ?/ L6 ]! c# s2 h- x! o$ F4 Ppeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be1 r& q, ?3 k* _! ^8 C torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished4 U r) |7 B+ g Q, L8 Y' Q! X memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".) x4 Z; Z/ q- b Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are) Z6 @+ `4 g$ i3 ]; R6 k! ` aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially* ]1 P* O9 E. k/ `9 s9 X non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 8 h; O& f$ P) Z+ _of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ) c% Q6 J4 r: l( |" GHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those % g9 J9 [$ Q1 T$ I& b h' opeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they2 t0 g7 D7 @7 W, B may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some * x" o0 o* Q4 t$ W$ M; wof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before$ t5 o Y9 E0 P# J) Z' v. O "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all, w( H4 Q" _; h people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise ( M6 T3 |- O, F/ ?5 wapartments are the way to go? No. - @$ O& u; C7 Z6 x' f 9 }$ y9 ?5 N2 A& n " I. J, ]$ D7 x: S3 B

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the! N% i2 s$ j/ k& ^ ~* ]3 Z situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this * a# E2 J2 u% x, k, Z. O'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make" p; [% _- _( B no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ( F$ g: p# t9 q6 ]9 s5 lfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant* X! y" o* ~' Y1 Q& h resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 2 d3 T9 }5 y5 E! H0 f+ [Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is6 s$ K, ]2 x* Q$ I2 i( I/ { unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-26 01:45 , Processed in 0.126279 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部