服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6773|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its " R* [8 n7 ~5 l3 h0 t9 Oarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 4 T* H+ X# _) [, Q V+ s0 hBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" $ P# c6 P2 c- z( w0 Q, O0 N: ~8 ccity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 8 [; J8 v: E' J6 S0 ~. AAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,1 w$ e6 [: D7 }" n 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of5 R" ~* [0 W+ v9 `4 p Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within4 ^% ~7 f5 u( Z; `9 R, s hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ( `/ R) p4 l8 u$ \6 U( Heach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera , w& J2 }4 |( ]! K% g* t- r9 K7 j* Y8 land Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is x) P% f7 M# e" t harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are' X/ O6 e" t/ ?' ?/ U. v' o descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and0 J T; g3 w1 H forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I/ j6 D: d' m( Z/ K was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great, Z: Z0 i9 F. N Q& |; s1 P7 j6 s6 U. X impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, + r) e& ` Z3 }0 X$ `and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong. x9 B$ U0 V3 u has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment' P9 C! {$ X! V) d of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that / q/ W# @* f8 _+ M- C& T* ^no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are( t: N( V y, b/ d: K Q+ C only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a! [5 e. U1 ]: O& Y% V. D sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government$ Q5 ^1 M: d4 b; m- m want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move & K0 G$ E- X; ^. D* | sto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is " o8 L5 n+ }, t2 J2 J# X; ?" Z"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,( L9 t% \( F- Q8 a& z- [$ K. i this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are' g. _" v) d0 I4 _+ J9 k still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to$ a; L4 V1 V4 j' l' K "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make& g) Y7 K& a0 f- i' b5 M O; `# @& X money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was; ~5 \$ z* i9 x a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a$ o$ P0 l" l% z [ parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across * ~5 `2 j) k2 l( }' U6 fthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural" { _; C* j% }7 Y$ T/ A importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for ! w6 _5 o K i% K" P2 E& odevelopment.

Hutongs. f; K; _# ^$ U( | in the old days were residential area where people actually lived& } ?' v) j! N: {4 B6 n9 I there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions* Q, u8 }6 }5 i. c6 { in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not / z+ |; T. S3 O1 Dhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you- J5 h7 A3 P1 O# } will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs., x1 j5 O9 b* s: z/ ~8 e+ D Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date- R, G# E4 E8 {4 B0 `) a to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used$ A& o" K( t# n) \2 O to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses % K" w) w- X( g; V2 H/ lsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically * w/ g( @. g, `; _unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 4 L# y, g/ C( ulive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, . P* b$ N7 W2 c3 vhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the1 s& o9 V; H. G2 g balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 5 A$ I2 X# L- p# v, y! d4 X/ \project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be. ~0 ^4 Y/ X+ U4 ` H renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong/ k$ d6 G1 C3 ]) N! A7 Z Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how k1 S- h* j* B# b. f: W" s: Apeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be A0 G& j' o8 b! n. `( s+ Ltorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished # s$ {: k. g9 M+ h1 X, t0 Jmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".: R0 y! T. \$ {" ~" p- N$ M Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are# Y7 z8 B: {8 A- R# I! R aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 8 K2 U8 x! k8 D( ~# Xnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image! ^( a, U+ z ~* y# B of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these5 c* |$ ?1 V1 l/ j7 T Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 1 {( k. x5 r1 O* G7 Jpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they6 n( k+ C* ~$ u& Z+ N may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 3 e$ _ \) Z4 }7 y1 |of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before* q- J! r7 q4 u "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all $ a! ^% d+ D6 Z% X* l3 Qpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise, q. ?7 \$ d# m4 N, k2 ~ apartments are the way to go? No.) }" X/ `/ S J6 z + s' O$ C8 W0 p- _5 p3 J% Z8 Z g) G7 m ' y1 h# }$ e" C, K+ Z2 c

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the & i4 k, y" a, asituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this$ v2 l% ?7 m4 c5 H d* u @ 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make ( r$ _& A5 V# K4 K6 Bno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so8 v* X. X. V/ Z fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant " I2 t4 w+ s7 K3 b/ w n+ Oresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless8 E# {+ E" [- k9 {! z6 \' g4 x. m Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is $ x+ A* e, N& H9 W' nunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-19 04:58 , Processed in 0.111046 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部