服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6651|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ' l/ _$ q5 Z6 B" J' ^! l* garchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider , R' \5 I" [9 P6 CBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"3 J. P+ d; Q7 u! h8 E city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ! v+ Q+ T# [, _% A5 fAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,* y x- a, z2 }1 O z$ ] 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of4 i/ e; l* a! a2 W0 [ Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within ) M# c, C4 A Rhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ( x$ g; ~& D! Y& ]# z/ feach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera + r# o. A1 W2 Q f5 e3 iand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is7 Z* m/ e8 q7 m- r6 L harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are2 m L$ G1 o+ h8 x) M descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and6 x' v7 T I( d. O forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I & {* j9 Z5 I3 R7 M) Z, o/ b# twas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great . A2 Y7 d: U6 d6 gimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,; ?' o: k! ~5 N1 c2 X and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong- ?1 k9 }6 L+ A7 G3 a has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment' C6 p' L2 t8 A! P0 G% f of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that! Y% e9 {! M) \4 D* A0 H6 S" ~ no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are * K$ T0 T# Q( H9 S& N0 bonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a * K" W- Q6 c& a5 a' R8 osort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government ; B# z' p6 {: [want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move: V$ c! g7 i% `# J3 o0 K5 o to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 5 M( B' d' N P* k' b% u' F8 ^"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 5 h. L S5 ]+ gthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are( x% ^$ ?' I$ z9 @ still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to # q- S* K I$ q2 C' y3 ]"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make, Y$ @7 x' I7 N# r1 s money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was5 Z/ k8 Y0 b9 H) J, u0 D& g a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 9 { n6 m4 F0 o7 c. Cparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across& r# k" J$ e7 Q the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural, U5 A! E2 }3 X8 y6 a6 ] importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 7 p8 C$ R' Z! k$ [& y. w$ W. ~development.

Hutongs1 y( f: q. h3 ` in the old days were residential area where people actually lived ( Y; U# L) Q( P' Q. Rthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions2 q& b5 w+ n: c in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 5 \+ F. Y# L: F( a8 r" Qhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you " g3 ~. Y4 j' j7 e2 r' j. U! h, ?. xwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.* p: N" h K' [& a Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 5 }9 @0 u3 I j; G* w( U$ |to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 7 [& F6 I1 }7 p) J' y/ W# z% lto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses& S+ S' h/ e1 B8 {' a support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically3 Z2 H* [) G& v0 Y/ H- G unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to9 ]( z) y' p( `% O live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,' b4 ]* n% A J, o. |" }% v hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the , F. o3 f, T: B1 @4 u/ Ubalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the' b2 `- j5 t9 j q, t3 [5 p+ g project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be9 n3 |0 u) d. v h renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong/ \) Y2 l3 o7 } ]) S5 s& z; S5 Z Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 5 \& v; I5 ~$ E' E2 H3 J- o9 Ypeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be+ \0 W4 q( K3 l5 p torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 8 x* x9 H& K% _3 Z% ]memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress"., g( _+ N5 b* y8 S$ T Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 1 j( `" {' H, }% jaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially ! {. k9 l- M8 s- M- F" Fnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image+ ]$ F' E1 R- L; G/ ^ of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these; Z9 a) f6 ^" P* z- J$ U5 ~1 m Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those + ~( H0 `1 W# M& _9 ~9 cpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they % g, A6 C5 w7 o! p3 }0 _; D: ~may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some . o) a0 f/ B+ x: z9 G' bof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before) F) Y1 |2 h* B, ^$ h9 v# h! N "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all % z9 q' u# R( H: wpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise1 ]2 D* N- M( R+ P" r4 d3 P apartments are the way to go? No.0 W$ @" J5 R: e0 O1 ]5 H ; E0 y N9 @6 {+ H; K- N ( r5 R: e1 J: g0 V/ V4 }

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 5 m; O% p* M' vsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 2 {4 s, f; z& d m9 k2 z1 d'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 7 \8 e4 ?+ R) k% U/ T( D9 f1 Rno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so& C, q! z4 B2 d: f* l8 s1 g7 ^ c fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 4 v8 D, o" q' k+ Kresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 1 m7 F. N& t9 `Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is & Y7 W5 ^! c* k; t/ S& {unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-5 19:38 , Processed in 0.124237 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部