|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 5993|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its $ K# I. B& n; V; F* sarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 1 B$ S+ {* d# \( yBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"* O, x7 ?8 y% K& M! v city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.9 l7 T2 c/ G! }3 E; L4 w: K9 F5 _ According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,5 z, R: @! x4 f& r( z1 _6 w% @ 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 7 Q7 K' F. ^/ f! BManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 7 \# ^2 L( X7 ^& ~8 T/ r( G) W2 Nhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among5 G& N; ?+ X9 @; \; g each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera " z( X$ J3 l% P) m/ Oand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is$ b/ Y' j* T- F; x. v harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 7 @" [5 ?' C! J* W0 Zdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and$ p* M% [+ Z7 D& Q3 H' w4 ~ forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I# q; l2 X3 B1 e was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great6 |5 H) \" R5 G impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ! @; y- Y$ v# N! ?& Y# oand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong; v5 s: d0 k7 L" z has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ( l$ o! W/ V# D1 yof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 8 l9 e# C7 c- _, J! ~7 Cno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are; e4 [) q( a0 a only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a& O p* e7 }+ \* a" U8 h( B9 D sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government " k4 E6 E( g( ?. B0 n2 vwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move/ d+ w3 L L+ f* i to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ; u' R/ G$ [9 ~& ^6 c7 r% ~* h. N"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,4 {) B) S9 U+ j; A this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 6 j8 V6 A: e1 Cstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 9 w( }1 N, P/ H E# k"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 8 M- m7 t/ q" L5 Z' n; `' h" R1 @money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was " {# X/ j& {" J2 L0 B( c& z: Xa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 3 @2 L9 i) [# w3 \ |& `! @" z; Rparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across % r) b+ y& S3 p' {9 y; Q! t$ T* ?the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 1 g4 S% w: y9 m5 J( e8 ]importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for : t7 K4 W3 j' e( p5 _& ]6 u( {development.

Hutongs% D* {* s5 {* ^ in the old days were residential area where people actually lived) p7 B0 S9 G6 M" w/ B there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 9 a. {# j' P- m) _3 s. E5 D! ^in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not( o; J! |& s/ B0 C have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ' o. b; l9 ?, d. q8 awill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.6 T- c' i1 h; h. l0 v0 m K Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date / M* l3 Y* Q1 K& Z- v3 R8 wto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used" _0 S- x C7 A! r/ u to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses8 b2 F& a# U9 R: I) T& |9 a$ r+ v( d. V support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically * o2 N2 G- G/ y* i G7 w4 L0 Munfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 9 c2 K, b9 a( R$ y; h0 dlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,0 i$ h1 j- F8 T9 \ hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the0 C! i6 N# d" t5 E+ U balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the% N e* H7 S5 e0 z3 W6 V project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 0 g7 C' Q; A! ]9 ]renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 3 u& }* S. o+ {8 b QMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how : k! Z. V+ l) |/ T. y; h' k9 p, opeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be% b b3 ?2 P% Z, h torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished / I6 {3 c4 l( S, ~0 i$ p0 gmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". / D( ]! L& x+ {0 A1 H- [$ [Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 3 }6 i! Y* \8 x" J/ `, R- Yaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially + D$ k) \: I, J0 g8 Znon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image* ~; U. R5 M, \ of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these3 {5 z' {- E" | Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those9 T( E; P7 c' H# ^- U3 M/ l people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they ; z8 J& G5 J0 m1 \may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some7 v- G% h: Z0 d7 c! t: @ of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ) O8 p1 c1 A8 Q1 V"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all - d5 _2 q8 s$ ]* t1 xpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise1 R+ k/ e* k) n. j- `4 e apartments are the way to go? No. @1 N6 \% x6 l5 K1 V& m7 C ( B4 T1 I% a' z- Z / Z9 Y6 c7 Y, j( o3 R B6 j- e

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the/ M2 C; h- S4 D situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 3 u6 ?6 y8 M" y& w0 i7 R: K'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make ) n* E+ d# N4 d6 mno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so7 `% O% X' S5 Y fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant" T1 ?6 L, s2 y% L3 V8 f resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless( T4 u3 h" W1 x$ F4 y Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is) K/ ~* G- d7 g+ p- { unlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-7-6 08:28 , Processed in 1.182154 second(s), 5 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部