服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6660|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its - Y+ J6 ~, K$ p" b( q& sarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider + m0 {5 ?' F8 iBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"% f& ^7 ~; P0 o( [ city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 5 p0 p/ _- D8 eAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,6 X" v. d3 v: D% Y 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of$ j: p4 B1 e, K Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within! N3 }$ w! c' T+ X# y hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among - |4 r6 D: y7 E1 Neach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera - K* X" U9 E9 }* C# J& v4 Hand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is3 w* O3 z! f4 c harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are) z6 x: c* ]# O descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and: {' w; c& ~0 p$ O6 c) h' N forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I9 E5 U: F1 S' S/ `7 N. b was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great/ {! g' |/ n0 d% b impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,5 S* \ _/ l, N( ^: w and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong ( y( i# D: r i( x; ihas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment4 X( Z% Z/ a1 a, i4 K! \) g of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that % U9 k, I4 p) K% v) rno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ) Y4 x7 Y: \% ^" T0 z7 `only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a W- o* Z/ o' Y4 e& x8 k* `$ I' Z; S sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government* ?: F" w& T6 C. C# T want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move $ u5 {; @4 J6 nto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 9 w$ L' H/ q2 v"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, $ X; {; X Y, Vthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are : a% t% N& u, X4 c0 Zstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to1 w7 B x1 u( L "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make; C9 g+ @, Y6 j- O. _% u& R money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was. |& x! K$ N/ f) [% U3 V! Y4 X a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 2 H" X& |4 q& e! J% aparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across" Z$ R; G" u3 }& b2 w6 q; l the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ; k+ G+ m% P/ r* N, {, x* Wimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for " \" G& f. y' n8 H6 ` }development.

Hutongs . Z' J# t( N% min the old days were residential area where people actually lived ; v0 G: ]% R7 s5 lthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions, b* |1 {- o3 R; N; j3 {2 s; @ X in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not % w7 Y3 U" ?6 X$ _have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you - _3 z1 X& S9 q* _0 Vwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 3 q0 ~: `' t$ o$ TFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date/ d6 ]1 d1 Y$ Q- D9 W" U to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used2 R! U }, }, n1 C' i& l; D# r to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses$ Q2 X9 }" v/ s1 _ support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically % Z# k8 d& B1 k5 g" u6 @- [, g' b( ?; f. Funfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to8 v6 E' Z! Q+ L& F, d/ E live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, + t U. A% i0 f9 U$ z: Z2 `1 }hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the* }! s& o! _3 k" @ balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the6 a* V; |* Y- W# |/ v project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be4 \3 h4 L/ ?- j, \4 ^2 E renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong/ u8 R. d0 ~" Q' W Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how7 w0 k% P+ ^; F, Z) w people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be& E3 ~! x$ S* H4 T# M torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished; U! H/ x8 j. e I memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".- K' o' w; W. Z, S5 | Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 6 R% b* z; ?; y8 C- j* B3 Valigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially ; @1 x) c" r. X3 R* P7 unon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image " e" S- c2 c f( aof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 8 h$ u$ m# W: M8 t! ]# Q7 ^Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 2 d2 S! }) I2 ?- e- e0 Gpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they. |+ v0 O7 Y4 K5 I may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some& @3 B$ U2 q$ ~( G, Q! J( X of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before! [2 v* V8 Q8 V/ L( |* ~ "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 0 K3 K; C4 ^; g' ?1 N# X: Rpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 7 B) P" ^! I8 l: l6 Y8 o" E- `0 qapartments are the way to go? No. $ n1 p; p5 G0 o6 G" {6 C 2 P" K9 n3 s3 N2 A" R* h ) t' V: c6 s m

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the9 p$ B6 B- z0 ~+ E" s situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this1 o- K- U; j( b 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make : H6 V+ T# e3 G" v" l H9 ~no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 9 O2 V4 q3 n# I8 d- n- cfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 8 I: X2 O+ u9 t' {6 Fresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 4 L. r# V9 H9 Y9 X# F- w/ hBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is5 F! r g/ K, j( i5 ~* e unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-6 22:06 , Processed in 0.133689 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部