服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6772|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its" I" |( x+ y% c1 x2 a1 p architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider , v$ S" d; n; F8 W8 Y8 wBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"6 X! Z* n L, Y$ k7 ^ city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. % y( H, ]1 y. M& PAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, & K; L* z1 ~( k1 j+ n( E3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of & X% K2 I' F9 P2 n7 R8 j2 SManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 8 x- g& Z$ S' X: f& _1 Ahutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among . ^ ~3 j( k2 Q! Z( Weach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera* J) Z6 @3 A7 d- o% x8 r and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is. W+ _. V3 f( ]' G5 J; B$ T0 |( r harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ( i8 ~, b: b L7 B; qdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and + u& N& y! \$ u+ qforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I5 U, d7 a5 k2 [+ o! I was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great & ?, S. |$ V& \5 I6 s7 {$ kimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,) _$ e8 [2 ~6 O: Y7 E# m" o and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong % v% V/ b* K; `) ?5 Zhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment' r* b, Q8 N) d0 ^* `0 @8 _* ? of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that - B' C! k/ @4 L8 w4 C8 o7 Hno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are K: |% r8 \: M( l. U* d5 J only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a% a! x: X: l# P+ q0 M3 S2 I* t sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government V7 q9 K5 t% y, A* ywant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move . w) o V" K6 R* y& w# sto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is5 C: X" i+ G6 p6 h2 ?& V "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,3 G) z3 x3 c3 ^! c; ~ this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are / d+ I! i' X* V0 ]) Ystill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to0 d" k& `# j8 {# [) M "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make + S0 @4 C ^! z4 v3 q# C$ smoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was ; N" d3 K+ k! w) W4 U* f- ia beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a & n3 C* d+ O. Q5 d7 N7 |parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across! O# j" Z# E; N8 Q, @ the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural! f0 o2 B$ {% r( m( M, |3 l importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for. T/ e3 _5 x1 N8 p& w% L: S development.

Hutongs J+ L! o& v. \) Z# i in the old days were residential area where people actually lived! c3 N1 F# H5 X" R# v4 J6 T* G9 n0 D% B there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions( R+ j6 y: G6 [1 }3 V( b [ in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not& g6 f. K) o8 z9 W# L; O! c% ~: _ have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you) i% L# r: X0 ~, g% l0 O( v will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.- u, B, H& Z: e$ }+ v Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date& E* I; u: _* m& ^- x( \ ~8 p- _ to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used8 K; W% q1 v# h3 ^; a" R5 h to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 9 f( P; k+ t) R9 W4 r1 U9 a: Vsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically ; U& q' l' ^4 r, vunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 5 O* L S+ l! t+ q5 mlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, ' A% ~) w( Q0 |3 ?: N% M! Zhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 4 R4 }1 J1 z* n. ]balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the; w$ W' A* h" T" t. \* p; z V project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be % o9 [- h- w+ krenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong' A% ^/ F$ b$ L1 |. ?1 J Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 9 R: k1 I0 V( z7 ?people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be- C9 u% u5 J* Y4 c0 u% B* C torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished # E# ]. T% q) c+ [: S# k6 ^0 m" C& hmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".) g# A4 R. B$ W/ H% \+ o Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are # `* U8 [/ [8 w$ v1 Z0 }, ~aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially " Q" A) \, m( b' f: vnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image' c7 f8 [$ p2 t3 k of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ) \2 }. [/ t% T3 v8 W2 D5 bHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those : R8 O$ `% \( j. d7 Gpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they % V* N* K3 M: [$ hmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some0 f# c5 N3 e- @. i3 C of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 4 X3 H3 q4 b; k1 Y! V+ F- [/ r- p"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all , ~( t( j" M, I3 H/ y" ?people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise2 I4 ^ [0 r: Z* D: {) A apartments are the way to go? No.; U6 J( p9 _ B0 k4 X5 E* C 9 }! h" t8 b: ~, N" ^ 7 K0 V* t5 l& {: q

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the+ Z3 a, R. T) B7 J+ a# j( N: p situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 8 \1 z! A' F9 T7 i6 s'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 0 ^& K9 |; _5 Q/ Mno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so7 Y+ X+ V( S9 W fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant' S* _8 f' c$ c5 f% ^- D) a resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 8 }* A b" C) x7 JBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is4 B$ n2 H4 ^/ { unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-18 22:59 , Processed in 0.117851 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部