服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6361|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 2 m" c8 s3 N# @* T& W* ]" C& D$ tarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider7 Y! q& w5 ?' u1 P9 T, ` Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"* t4 z! i7 H# Y! ~3 O" w city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.- W" o2 V& s V" C9 f4 l, D$ p According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,/ o/ r' x/ T+ Z1 ^ 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of # \; y% b* K( }2 ?0 m- M- HManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within + _% q( |# W0 E5 K( {5 ?hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 5 L5 l; I" B, q7 ?1 ]each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 4 [! ^- [) q2 T# gand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is; e8 P$ @* e) n/ X harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 5 Q+ Q/ d) d0 g& kdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and . e7 I9 U e+ B* w: eforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I " k9 k1 ]) z7 x' P: @' [was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great% _, C+ Q( i8 y4 |9 W. u impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, + X* j8 `' |) l) r" ~' r" Qand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong ( ?: _8 G( N _' h8 uhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ) K6 {- L$ E" mof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that4 a/ k5 j% g; C no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are - _( F# d: k+ Yonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 1 C0 S/ O/ Z# [) S, m: ^sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 8 f8 t% t9 t- E! m: e! A* ywant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move ' K9 a* i- I1 _to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is : D4 ]: Z: q! t8 u2 i; |2 Z"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,. o- [% C. z6 p) f8 n d! K7 n4 m this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are* U$ [5 {1 y) D6 M, \ still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to - G. V& S0 Q$ }"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make * }6 {' m& V3 i; ?6 B, w e, zmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was' d. b, k4 v/ } g* n a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a( y6 i$ [6 {5 z9 v parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across; R; u) E3 U$ S n: y! \* B. n! ^ the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural' u6 z* b/ F1 C* X, {9 e importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for $ s* d- g' o* K. r8 H. A1 k) Ldevelopment.

Hutongs' {* y1 Y# |/ e) j in the old days were residential area where people actually lived$ M) X0 M/ ^& |9 x there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions9 _2 [& z2 j, }, ^ in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not y3 w+ m) s3 }1 \) F have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you$ d/ `% `% \; n9 x+ X- Y will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. L, n' Z( p2 ^% \1 L6 L4 m! cFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 5 o( E+ k) W, |" q# oto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used - y7 h4 H! M( P. J, w _- Ato hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses% ~1 f! T9 ]* [/ `3 D+ t support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically; D/ z! |4 j/ p% K% G unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to" s t% b# N! K7 g# C$ p& c live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,: V8 ^3 M+ C7 S/ `8 j; f hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the0 ^! e/ R, r0 P. I! ~ balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the # k Q9 \4 i, b4 u$ }project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be9 H+ }/ J5 m1 `/ K! t! E8 t9 u renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong1 M8 Q* a; Q: ^' w; u5 t; y Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how4 w2 K6 J; M# f( Y$ c4 U8 ]$ V, R4 c! ^ people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be2 A+ s# d+ d% y5 b1 I torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 1 _- u3 F& p5 S% ymemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 5 }/ c6 x; g+ BNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are7 c" Y* N. k# L+ y aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially6 i+ x. r# a' F non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image / t% J2 h* J7 a z. ~! sof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ) m" d; P" l3 o0 ?Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those# e4 e6 K( P# G# _& g- R people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they # o+ p6 F3 _3 @2 F0 cmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some. W5 Y9 |: m/ v% C* m' g1 ^0 ?) a of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before- o8 ]1 @* Z k/ } "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all3 i$ O) U0 H( [. c people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise5 g2 e1 l6 Z; @2 }' w5 D/ B: H apartments are the way to go? No.7 ~+ L' v) q; ^/ E8 L9 C8 q* y + z% g/ L8 ]8 p; f , E; x6 a. m" _7 O2 G" s

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the' u8 b9 o; \' k8 b W* Q" ` situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this; c5 b: ^! n$ O2 C# R5 g! [8 Q 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make2 h$ C9 v; {2 w# y. Q0 f no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so% l. F- \: U: `" s3 f v L8 u fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant1 b( F1 g+ H) E resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless9 Y( |3 q, @8 {# U+ @3 N Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is. {$ X! u) \" @% T unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-3 02:16 , Processed in 0.124960 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部